Penggunaan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik untuk Meningkatkan Persepsi Siswa tentang Bioteknologi

Authors

  • Fitri Husni Mardiyah Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-5707
  • Widi Purwianingsih Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rini Solihat Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v10i1.5402

Keywords:

Electronic Module, Socio-scientific Issues, Biotechnology, Student Perception.

Abstract

Currently, the world has faced a new normal era, many schools have started to conduct limited face-to-face learning. But unfortunately, student learning hours at school are very limited. Students are required to be able to study independently outside of school hours. The module is one of the learning tools that can be accessed anywhere without being bound by time. On the other hand, at this time technology is developing rapidly, one of which is technology in the field of biology or can be called biotechnology. The development of biotechnology has an impact on life. Many people do not have a good perception of biotechnology. There needs to be an increase in community competence, one of which is through the field of education or specifically is that students can have a good perception based on scientific decisions through socio-scientific issues. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of using electronic modules based on socioscientific issues in increasing students' perceptions of biotechnology. This study uses a quasi-experimental design method. The research design used was a non-equivalent control group design. The sample in this study was grade 12 students consisting of 120 students who were determined by purposive sampling technique. The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences in students' perceptions of biotechnology after using the module. The Mann Whitney test on the value of students' perceptions of biotechnology shows a number (2-tailed = 0.003) < (0.05) which means that learning using electronic modules based on socioscientific issues has an influence on students' perceptions of biotechnology.

References

Aivelo, T., and Uitto, A. (2021). Factors Explaining Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Genetics and Belief in Genetic Determinism. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1408-1425.

Alanazi, F.H. (2021). Saudi Students’ and Science Teachers’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Towards Biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education.

Anagün, S., and Fen, T. (2012). Eighth-Grade Students' Perceptions of Biotechnology: A Case Study.

Chen, H.T., Lin, H., Huang, Y.N., and Hong, Z.R. (2017). Longitudinal Study of a Cooperation-Driven, Socio-Scientific Issue Intervention on Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking and Self-Regulation in Learning Science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2002-2026.

Cresswell. (2009). Technological Education, Interdisciplinarity, and the Journey Toward Sustainable Development : Nurturing New Communities of Practice. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(8), 37-41.

Dahlan, R. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Manusia. ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf, 4(1), 1-24.

Eastwood, J.L., Sadler, T.D., Sherwood, R.D., and Schlegel, W.M. (2018). Students’ Participation in an Interdisciplinary, Socioscientific Issues Based Undergraduate Human Biology Major and Their Understanding of Scientific Inquiry. Research on Science Education, 43(1), 1051-1078.

Estiati, A. (2015). Biosafety Regulation of Genetically Modified Products in Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 13(2), 129-146.

Hladnik, H.C., Hladnik, A., Javornik, B., Košmelj, K., and Peklaj, C. (2012). Is Judgement of Biotechnological Ethical Aspects Related to High School Students' Knowledge?. International Journal of Science Education, 34(8), 1277-1296.

Jayanti, F., dan Arista, N.T. (2018). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Pelayanan Perpustakaan Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Competence: Journal of Management Studies, 12(2), 205-223.

Jho, H., Yoon, H.G., and Kim, M. (2019). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Aking on Socio-Scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science and Education, 23(1), 1131-1151.

Kartika, I., Kurniasih, S., dan Pursitasari, I.D. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues pada Materi Bioteknologi untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 3(1), 1-12.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Retrieved June 20, 2022, from Panduan Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran pada Tahun Ajaran dan Tahun Akademik Baru di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Satuan Pendidikan di Zona Kuning, Oranye dan Merah Dilarang Melakukan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka. Interactwebsite: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/files/download/d16ebb4e0e2245e.

López-Banet, L., González, C.R., and Fernández, E.A. (2020). Relationships Between Knowledge, Attitudes and Interests of Spanish Pre-University Students in Relation to Different Areas of Biotechnology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 16(12), 1-12.

PaÅ¡, M., Vogrinc, J., Raspor, P., KneževiÄ, N.U., and Zajc, J.C. (2019). Biotechnology Learning in Slovenian Upper-Secondary Education: Gaining Knowledge and Forming Attitudes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(1), 110-125.

Saifuddin, F., Putro, S.C., dan Irianto, W.S.G. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Interaktif Pemrograman Dasar Bermuatan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk Memahamkan Konsep Pemrograman Siswa Kelas X Program Keahlian TKJ di SMK Cendika Bangsa Kepanjen. Jurnal Teknologi, Kejuruan, dan Pengajarannya, 43(1), 51-61.

Sastria, E., Susanti, T., Novallyan, D., dan Alfatwa, P.A. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Praktikum Biologi Umum Jurusan Tadris Biologi Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Kerinci. Symbiotic: Journal of Biological Education and Science, 1(1), 42-52.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Walgito, B. (2013). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: NJ.

Yahaya, Mikhail, J., Nurulazam, A., and Karpudewan, M. (2016). College Students’ Attitudes Towards Sexually Themed Science Content: A Socioscientific Issues Approach to Resolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1174-1196.

Zo`bi, A.S. (2014). The Effect of Using Socio-Scientific Issues Approach in Teaching Environmental Issues on Improving the Students’ Ability of Making Appropriate Decisions Towards These Issues. International Education Studies, 7(8), 113-123.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Mardiyah, F. H., Purwianingsih, W., & Solihat, R. (2022). Penggunaan Modul Elektronik Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik untuk Meningkatkan Persepsi Siswa tentang Bioteknologi. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 10(1), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v10i1.5402

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): June

Section

Articles

Citation Check