Description of the Ability to Arrange Assessments According Curriculum 2013 on Chemistry PPG SM3T Student

Authors

  • Sri Rahayu Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
  • Hairida Hairida Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University Pontianak, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rahmat Rasmawan Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University Pontianak, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rody Putra Sartika Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University Pontianak, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Lukman Hadi Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Tanjungpura University Pontianak, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10442

Keywords:

compiling an assesment student of PPG SM3T, chemistry education, curriculum 2013

Abstract

The curriculum 2013 experienced a shift in the assessment process, which is from the assessment of results to the assessment process. In the process of carrying out the assessment, many complaints that arise in the field including the difficulty in determining the assessment of various aspects both cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Researchers are interested in knowing how the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students as a prospective professional teacher in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The research purposes were to describe the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The methode of the research was descriptive with study case involved 16 students of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in the 2018/2019 school year. The research instrument was in the form of an assessment rubric with 10 aspects of assessment, one of which contained HOTS questions. The results of the data analysis showed that the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in compiling HOTS questions was classified as less skilled with an average score 67.19% whereas when viewed from all aspects of the preparation of the assessment based on curriculum 2013 it was classified as skilled with an average score 84.89%.

References

Allen, K. N. & Friedman, B. D. (2010). Affective learning: A taxonomy for teaching social work values. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 7(2).

Farida, I. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran berdasarkan Kurikulum Nasional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Fithri Nuru Ayuni. 2014. Pemahaman Guru terhadap Pendekatan Saintifik (Scientific Approach) dalam Pembelajaran Geografi. Tesis Mahasiswa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung.

Hairida. (2017). Keterampilan Calon Guru Kimia dalam Mengembangkan Alternative Assessment. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, XXII(1).

Hasriani, A. (2015). Kontribusi Motivasi, Penguasaan Informasi dan Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia terhadap Kesiapan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2).

Istiqomah, F. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura. Jurnal Universitas Tanjungpura.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Lampiran Permendikbud Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan RI.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Atas. (Ebook).

Kunanti, E. S. (2020). Penyusunan Pengembangan Penilaian Berbasis HOTS. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional PBSII (Issue 1). http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/41215/1/Fulltext.pdf

Kurniasih, I dan Sani, B. (2016). Revisi Kurikulum 2013 Implimentasi Konsep dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Kata Pena.

Mahdiansyah. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Sistem Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa (Studi Kasus di Enam Kota). Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 11(2): 48-63.

Melati, E Rahma. 2016. Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Memahami Kurikulum 2013. Indonesian Jurnal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 4 (1): 1-9.

Mosher, J, dkk. (2011). Validity and Test Development. Boston: Pearson Education.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Pemikiran Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2016). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurwardani, P, etc. (2018). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Industri 4.0. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementrian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim. (2010). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Puskurbuk, Balitbang Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Penelitian tentang Penilaian Guru atas Hasil Belajar Siswa Pendidikan Menengah.

Puspendik, Balitbang, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Studi Implementasi Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013.

Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Baru. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(3).

Retnawati, Heri., Hadi, Samsul., Nugraha A Chandra. 2016. Vocational Highschool Teachers‟ Difficulties in Implementing Assessmen Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Jurnal of Instruction, 12 (1): 33-48.

Ruslan, Fauziah, T., & Alawiyah, T. (2016). Kendala Guru dalam Menerapkan Penilaian Autentik di SD Kabupaten Pidie. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 147–157.

Rusman (2014). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Spang, E. J. (2008). How does teacher education make a difference in our schools? Begining science teachers' and their students' understanding and use of scientific inquiry. UMI 3332930 Disertation Publisher ProQuest.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293

Sugiyono. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Sunarti & Rahmawati, S. (2014). Penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Supardi. (2015). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Supratiknya, A. (2012). Penilaian hasil belajar dengan teknik nontes. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Uno, H. B & Koni, S. (2016). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Rahayu, S., Hairida, H., Rasmawan, R., Sartika, R. P., & Hadi, L. (2024). Description of the Ability to Arrange Assessments According Curriculum 2013 on Chemistry PPG SM3T Student. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(1), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10442

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): February 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.