Application of Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Conceptual Knowledge and Problem Solving Ability of Senior High School Students

Authors

  • Nada Shofa Department of Chemistry Education, FKIP, Halu Oleo University, Jl. HEA. Mokodompit, Anduonohu Kendari 93232, Indonesia
  • Supriadi Supriadi SMA Negeri 6 Bombana, Bombana South-East Celebes, Indonesia
  • Wisnu Aldoko SMA Negeri 2 Sawa, North Konawe, South-East Celebes, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i6.13930

Keywords:

Jigsaw type, coopretive learning, conceptual knowledge, problem solving

Abstract

This study proves that the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model can improve the conceptual knowledge of students on thermochemistry material, which is a learning model that has an influence on improving students' conceptual knowledge of thermochemistry. It aims to improve students' conceptual knowledge and problem solving ability through the application of the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model, taking into account the students' basic mathematics ability level which is classified into three categories: low, medium, and high. This research used quasi-experiment method with pretest-posttest control group factorial design. The subjects of the study were students of class XI IPA at SMA Negeri 06 Bombana, Bombana Region. Data were obtained through conceptual knowledge test, problem solving ability test, and student response questionnaire. The results showed that the conceptual knowledge of students who followed the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model was quantitatively higher than that of students who followed the conventional learning model. The results showed that the conceptual knowledge of students who followed Jigsaw cooperative learning was quantitatively higher than that of students who followed conventional learning. The same applies to problem solving ability, where students with the Jigsaw model showed quantitatively higher results compared to conventional learning students. the increase in conceptual knowledge was greater in the Jigsaw group compared to conventional learning. The level of students' basic mathematics ability did not affect the increase in conceptual knowledge, but did affect the increase in problem solving ability. Students gave positive responses to the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model, stating that this model was fun, easy to follow, and increased learning motivation.

References

Anderson, L.W., and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, Teaching, and Assesing; A Revision of Blooms’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.

Arends, R. I. (1989). Learning to Teach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Arikunto, S. (2005). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bangash, F. K., and Mustafa, S. (2002). Essentials of Matematics in Teaching Chemistry. Proceedings of 10th IOSTE Symposium, 2, Parana Brazil: Foz do Iquaso.

Brady, J. E. (2006). Kimia Universitas Asas dan Struktur Edisi Ke Lima Jilid 1. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.

Darsono, Max. dkk. (2000). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Donovan, W. J. and Wheland, E. R. (2009). “Comparisons of Success and Retention in A General Chemistry Course Before and After The Adoption of A Mathematics Prerequisiteâ€. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 371-382.

Emildadiany, N. (2008). Bentuk Pengelolaan Kelas Persiapan Mengajar. Jakarta: Universitas Kuningan.

Erlianingsih, T. (2009). “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe CIRC dan Tipe Jigsaw dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA pada Materi Dinamika Rotasiâ€. Tesis. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Fahyuddin. (2014). “Perkuliahan Matematika Spesifik Kimia untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis-Matematika, Komunikasi Matematis dan Pemecahan Masalah Kimia Kuantitatifâ€. Disertasi. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Haetami, A. dan Supriadi. (2010). “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutanâ€. WAKAPENDIK Universitas Haluoleo Kendari, 1(6) 1-11.

Hung, W. and Jonassen, D. H. (2006). “Conceptual Understanding of Casual Reasoning in Physicsâ€. International Journal of Sciennce Education, 28(13), 1601-1621.

Johnson, D.W. (1994). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. Minneapolis: Minnesota 55455 University of Minnesota.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1992). Models of Teaching. Sixth Edition, Boston: Allyn and Bacon A Pearson Education Company.

Leopold, D.G. and Edger, B. (2008). “Degree of Mathematics Fluency and Success in Second-Semester Introductory Chemistryâ€. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(5), 724-731.

Lie, A. (2002). Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Nicoll, G. and Francisco, J. S. (2001). An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Student Performance in Physical Chemistryâ€. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(1), 99-102.

Nursalam, L.O. (2007). “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep dan KeterampilanBerfikir Kritis Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Listrik Dinamisâ€. Tesis. Bandung: Perpustakaan UPI.

Offer, Joey, and Mireles, S. V. (2009). “Mix It Up: Teacher’s Beliefs on Mixing Mathematics and Scienceâ€. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 109, (3).

Potgieter, M., Harding, A., and Engelbrecht, J. (2008). Transfer of Algebraic and Graphical Thinking between Mathematics and Chemistryâ€. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 45(2), 197-218.

Prastini, M. (2014). “Peningkatan Keterampilan Sosial Siswa dan hasil Belajar IPS Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe jigsaw di SMPN 4 Secangâ€. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Purcell, E. J., Varberg, D., and Rigdon, S. E. (2004). Kalkulus Jilid 1. Ed. Kedelapan. . Alih Bahasa., Gresando, J. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning : Theory, Research, and practice, (second ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sudjana, N. (2002). Metoda Statistik. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta

Sugiyono. (2013). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Syam, F. (2015). “Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Termokimia dan Keterampilan Ilmiah melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbingâ€. Tesis. Kendari: Universitas Halu Oleo.

Tai, R. H., Ward, R. B., and Sadler, P. M. (2006). “ High School Chemistry Content Background of Introductory College Chemistry Students and Its Association with College Chemistry Grades.†Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1703-1711.

Tran, V. D., & Lewis, R. (2012). “Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students at An Giang University in Vietnamâ€. International Education Studies, 5(1) 86-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n1p86

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Shofa, N., Supriadi, S., & Aldoko, W. (2024). Application of Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Conceptual Knowledge and Problem Solving Ability of Senior High School Students. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 12(6), 1496–1511. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i6.13930

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 6 (2024): December 2024

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.