Description of Science Literacy Epistemic Knowledge Ability of Chemistry Education Students on the Material of Colligative Properties of Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i6.14230Keywords:
chemistry, colligative properties solution, epistemic knowledge, science literacyAbstract
The ability of science literacy epistemic knowledge is a fundamental thing that must be owned by students in facing the global era to be able to meet the needs of life in various situations. Epistemic knowledge can be said to be a more advanced level of knowledge because epistemic knowledge is closely related to the process of knowledge construction. This study aims to determine the science literacy skills of chemistry education students on the material of colligative properties of solutions. The research method used was a descriptive quantitative method. The study used a sample of 25 samples of 6th semester and 4th semester students using purposive samples. Data collection techniques in this study through measurement techniques and direct communication techniques. The research instrument used in this research is a science literacy test that has been modified and adapted to the material of the colligative properties of the solution. The validation used in this study used construct validity and was validated by judgment experts in material and literacy with valid final results. The results of the research on the ability of epistemic knowledge of science literacy of chemistry education students FKIP Untan shown based on the test of science literacy skills with epistemic knowledge of science literacy on indicators explaining the process of scientific phenomena with an average percentage of 75% with sufficient category. Explaining observations of scientific phenomena with an average percentage of 74% with a sufficient category. Concluding scientific phenomena with an average percentage of 69% with a sufficient category. The overall total average of students' science literacy skills is 73.33% with a sufficient category.
References
Adly Mohamed Ahmad Ibrahim Alnagar. (2007). Using a Constructivist Learning Model for Developing Some Critical Reading and Argumentative Writing Skills Among.
Cerelia, J. J., Sitepu, A. A., N, F. A. L., Pratiwi, I. R., Almadevi, M., Farras, M. N., Azzahra, T. S., & Toharudin, T. (2021). Learning Loss Akibat Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Selama Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. Seminar NASIONAL Statistik, 1–14. http://semnas.statistics.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/erf_uploads/2021/11/Learning-Loss-Akibat-Pembelajaran-Jarak-Jauh-Selama-Pandemi-Covid-19-di-Indonesia.pdf
Dan, I., & Depdendent, F. (2015). Perbedaan kemampuan literasi sains siswa dengan gaya kognitif field independent dan field depdendent. 8(2), 27–34.
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fauziyah, A., Prasetyaningsih, P., & Biru, L. T. (2021). Analysis of Scientific Literacy Skills in Solving Question Science on Food Security Themes in Serang City. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v6n2.p56-63
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lut, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Indicators, O. (2016). Education at a Glance 2016 (Summary in Italian). https://doi.org/10.1787/8d06afc6-it
Indicators, O. S. (2019). Society at a Glance 2019 (Summary in English). https://doi.org/10.1787/dbbb7a05-en
Istyadji, M., & Sauqina. (2023). Conception of scientific literacy in the development of scientific literacy assessment tools: a systematic theoretical review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.016
Kartimi, K., & Winarso, W. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Science Literacy Skills; Implications for Scientific Approach in Elementary School. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 8(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v8i2.9175
Mellyzar, M., Alvina, S., & Zahara, S. R. (2022). Influence of POGIL and MFI Models on Science Literacy and Science Process Skills for Junior High School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.2121
Putri, T. R., Masriani, Rasmawan, R., Hairida, & Erlina. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia di Universitas Tanjungpura Pendahuluan. 6(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v6i2.25460
Subaidah, T., Muharrami, L. K., Rosidi, I., & Ahied, M. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Aspek Konteks dan Knowledge Menggunakan Cooperative Proplem Solving ( CPS ) dengan Strategi Heuristik. 2(2), 113–122.
Sumanik, N. B., Nurvitasari, E., & Siregar, L. F. (2021). Analysis of Science Literation Abilities Profile Prospective Teachers of Chemical Education. 12(1), 22–32.
Sutrisna, N., & Anhar, A. (2019). Analysis_of_Scientific_Literacy_Capabili. 314–317.
Utami, A. U. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) Berbasis Daring pada Pembelajaran IPA untuk Mengukur Literasi Sains. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v11i2.157
Wardhana, S. O., & Hidayah, R. (2021). Profil Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Ditinjau Dari Domain Pengetahuan The Science Literacy Profile of Senior High School Students in Terms of Knowledge Domains. 313–321.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.