The Effectiveness of the Case Method in Promoting Meaningful Learning and Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Munawwarah Munawwarah Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Zuhrah Adminira Ruslan Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v13i1.14567

Keywords:

case method, chemistry education, student learning outcomes

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of the case method in fostering meaningful learning and improving student learning outcomes. Using a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design, 20 chemistry education students participated in a series of learning activities centered around the case method. Data were collected through pretest and posttest essay assessments and analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests. Results showed a significant increase in the average student scores from 72.68 (pretest) to 85.21 (posttest), with a reduction in score variability, as evidenced by a t-statistic of -4.28 and a p-value of 0.00045. These findings indicate that the case method effectively enhances student understanding and promotes meaningful learning by engaging students in contextual problem-solving activities. This method aligns with constructivist learning theory and supports the development of essential skills such as critical thinking, collaboration, and the application of theoretical knowledge in practical contexts. Furthermore, its universal applicability across various disciplines highlights its potential to enhance educational practices. Future research should explore long-term impacts, optimize case selection, and examine integration with educational technologies.

References

Amyyana, A. H., Paristiowati, M., & Kurniadewi, F. (2017). Pirolisis Sederhana Limbah Plastik dan Implementasinya sebagai Sumber Belajar Berbasis Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) pada Pembelajaran Kimia. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 7(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.071.03

Ananikov, V. (2024). Top 20 Influential AI-Based Technologies in Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-cdm8w

Andrini, V. S., & Pratama, H. (2021). Implementasi Quiz Interaktif dengan Software Mentimeter dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v26i2.36923

Ballard, J., & Mooring, S. R. (2021). Cleaning Our World through Green Chemistry: Introducing High School Students to the Principles of Green Chemistry Using a Case-Based Learning Module. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1290–1295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00312

Bernholt, S., Broman, K., Siebert, S., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Digitising Teaching and Learning – Additional Perspectives for Chemistry Education. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800090

Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00001J

Buitre, S. L. (2023). Electronic Strategic Intervention Material (e-SIM) in Grade 7 (Biology): Effects on Students’ Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2751–2764. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.15

Chowdhury, M. A. (2013). Incorporating a Soap Industry Case Study To Motivate and Engage Students in the Chemistry of Daily Life. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(7), 866–872. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300072e

Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2021). Project-Based Learning in Integrated Science Education: Active Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices. In Lumat International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.9.1.1392

Harris, R. B., Mack, M. R., Bryant, J. R., Theobald, E. J., & Freeman, S. (2020). Reducing Achievement Gaps in Undergraduate General Chemistry Could Lift Underrepresented Students Into a “Hyperpersistent Zone.†Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz5687

Herreid, C. F. (2013). ConfChem Conference on Case-Based Studies in Chemical Education: The Future of Case Study Teaching in Science. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(2), 256–257. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2008125

Imaduddin, M., & Astuti, A. P. (2022). Strengthening Chemistry Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge through the Introduction of Augmented Reality and Learning Management Systems. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 2(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v2i1.299

Jahangiri, M., & Hajian, R. (2013). Creative Chemistry Teaching. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 25(1), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.13079

Kartimi, K., Gloria, R. Y., & Anugrah, I. R. (2021). Chemistry Online Distance Learning during the Covid-19 Outbreak: Do TPACK and Teachers’ Attitude Matter? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.28468

Kusuma, A. S., & Busyairi, A. (2023). The Influence of The Reading Concept Mapping-Student Team Achievement Division (REMAP-STAD) Model on Students’ Metacognitive Skills and Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(3), 1946–1956. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i3.1927

Lewis, M. S., Zhao, J., & Montclare, J. K. (2012). Development and Implementation of High School Chemistry Modules Using Touch-Screen Technologies. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 1012–1018. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200484n

Ley, S. V., Fitzpatrick, D. E., Myers, R. M., Battilocchio, C., & Ingham, Richard. J. (2015). Machineâ€Assisted Organic Synthesis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 54(35), 10122–10136. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201501618

MHLONGO, T., & Sedumedi, T. D. (2024). The Periodic Table and The Learning of Chemistry: Possibilities of Integrating Robotics and Concept-Based Approaches in Teaching. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3845513/v1

Peechapol, C. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Virtual Laboratory Simulation in Chemistry on Learning Achievement, Self-Efficacy, and Learning Experience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(20), 196. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i20.23561

Raihanah, D., Putri, N. M., Fatmawati, T. K., & Nurjayadi, M. (2024). Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Ability for Prospective Chemistry Teacher Students and Chemistry Teachers: A Literature Review. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 19(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6395

Rodríguez-Becerra, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., Díaz, T., Druker, S., Bahamonde Padilla, V., Pernaa, J., & Aksela, M. (2020). Developing technological pedagogical science knowledge through educational computational chemistry: a case study of pre-service chemistry teachers’ perceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 638–654. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00273A

Rodríguezâ€Escrich, C., & Pericà s, M. A. (2015). Organocatalysis on Tap: Enantioselective Continuous Flow Processes Mediated by Solidâ€Supported Chiral Organocatalysts. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2015(6), 1173–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201403042

Schweiker, S., & Levonis, S. (2023). Enhancing Chemistry Education Through Technology-Enhanced Learning: Impact on Student Outcomes. In Ascilite Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.463

Syam, A. J., & Ismanti, R. (2022). effect of celery extract on lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertension in Sumur Putat, Cipocok Serang Banten. International Journal of Health & Medical Sciences, 5(4), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhms.v5n4.1977

Tjalla, A., & Fitriani, S. (2017). The Effect of Multiple Choice Scoring Methods and Risk Taking Attitude Toward Chemistry Learning Outcomes. In Journal of E-Learning & Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.5171/2017.496122

Turk, B. R., Ertl, S., Wong, G., Wadowski, P. P., & Löfflerâ€Stastka, H. (2019). Does Case-Based Blended-Learning Expedite the Transfer of Declarative Knowledge to Procedural Knowledge in Practice? In BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1884-4

Ural, E. (2016). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students’ Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395

Wang, H., Xuan, J., Liu, L., Shen, X., & Xiong, Y. (2021). Problem-Based Learning and Case-Based Learning in Dental Education. In Annals of Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-165

Warju, W., Ariyanto, S. R., Soeryanto, S., Hidayatullah, R. S., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). Practical Learning Innovation: Real Condition Video-Based Direct Instruction Model in Vocational Education. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i1.12665

Wicaksono, A. T., & Rahmawati, H. (2022). Al Kawnu : Science and Local Wisdom Journal Pengaruh Penggunaan Worksheet Materi Asam Basa Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. 01(02), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.18592/alkawnu.v1i1.6402

Williams, U. J. (2020). Chemical Weapons Education in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum: A Case-Based, Active-Learning Approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1775–1778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00834

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Munawwarah, M., & Ruslan, Z. A. (2025). The Effectiveness of the Case Method in Promoting Meaningful Learning and Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 13(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v13i1.14567

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): February 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.