Analysis of Student Misconceptions Using the Three-tier Diagnostic Test on Atomic Structure Class X Material at SMA N 1 Lintau Buo

Authors

  • Rahma Tustari
  • Mimi Herman Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Mahmud Yunus State Islamic University Batusangkar, Indonesia
  • Dwivelia Aftika Sari Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Mahmud Yunus State Islamic University Batusangkar, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Elvy Rahmi Mawarnis Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Mahmud Yunus State Islamic University Batusangkar, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Hidayat Herman Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Mahmud Yunus State Islamic University Batusangkar, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v13i1.14633

Keywords:

atomic structure, misconceptions, three level diagnostic test

Abstract

This research is motivated by the number of students who experience misconceptions so that they are not successful in chemistry subjects. This study aims to determine the misconceptions that occur in class X students at SMA N 1 Lintau Buo using a three-tier diagnostic test on atomic structure material. In this study using a qualitative approach (descriptive) method. The subjects of this study were class X students with a total of 108 people. The instruments used are the main instrument (the researcher himself) and supporting instruments, namely the three-tier diagnostic test, interviews, observation and documentation. Data validity testing was carried out by increasing persistence and data triangulation. Furthermore, the data analysis technique uses the classification of student answers from the three-tier diagnostic test, then a percentage is obtained based on the atomic structure sub-matter which is grouped into categories of conceptual understanding, misconceptions and not conceptual understanding. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded that the results of the analysis of student misconceptions using the three-tier diagnostic test on class X atomic structure material at SMA N 1 Lintau Buo “are that there are two sub-matter of atomic structure with misconceptions with high criteria, namely in the sub-matter of atomic notation based on the number of protons, neutrons and electrons by 69% and sub-matter of isotopes, isobars and isotones by 62%. For the overall atomic structure sub-matter, the average in the concept understanding category is 36% medium criteria, the misconception category is 55.6% medium criteria and the category does not understand the concept of 8.4% low criteria.

References

Arieska, P. K., Herdiani, N., Sampling, S., & Relatif, E. (2018). Pemilihan Teknik Sampling Berdasarkan. 6(2).

Asaefullah, Jantriyani, & Sulistyaningrum, A. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Hots untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Hukum Pascal di SMA Negeri 8 Kota Serang. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v12i1.68205

Astuti, F., Redjeki, T., & Nurhayati, N. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Dan Penyebabnya Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Mia Sma Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016 Pada Materi Pokok Stoikiometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Sebelas Maret, 5(2), 10–17.

Djarwo, C. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia pada Materi Hidrokarbon. Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Mataram , 6 (2), 90-97. 6(2), 90–97.

Eviota, J. S., & Liangco, M. M. (2020). Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(September), 723–731.

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.

Herdien, R. A., & Bahriah, E. S. (2024). Identifikasi Mikonsepi Siswa Kelas X pada Materi Struktur. 01(02).

Hulyadi, H., Bayani, F., Ferniawan, Rahmawati, S., Liswijaya, Wardani, I. K., & Swati, N. N. S. (2024). Meeting 21st-Century Challenges: Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills through a Computational Chemistry-Aided STEM Project-Based Learning Approach. International Journal of Contextual Science Education, 1(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.29303/ijcse.v1i2.609

Hulyadi, H., Bayani, F., Muhali, M., Khery, Y., & Gargazi, G. (2023). Correlation Profile of Cognition Levels and Student Ability to Solve Problems in Biodiesel Synthesis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i6.3130

Ischak, N.I Domu, S.A., & Najmah, N. (2023). Identifikasi miskonsepsi menggunakan two-tier multiple choice pada konsep partikel materi untuk peserta didik kelas IX. Journal of Education Chemistry, 3(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.37304/jem.v3i2.5503

Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah, N., & Elvinawati, E. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index) Pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa. Alotrop, 5(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v5i1.16487

Kamal, S., & Mulhayatiah, D. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier Pada Hukum Newton Dan Penerapannya. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 1(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v1i1.3441

Karim, F., Ischak, N. I., Mohamad, E., & Aman, L. O. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Ikatan Kimia Menggunakan Diagnostic Test Multiple Choice Berbantuan Certainty of Response Index. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i1.13239

Kustiarini, F. T., Susanti VH, E., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2019). Penggunaan Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier Test Alasan Terbuka untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Larutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpkim.v8i2.25236

Lahinda, C. G., & Tuerah, J. M. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Dasar Kimia Menggunakan Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Di SMA Negeri 1 Tatapaan. Oxygenius Journal Of Chemistry Education, 3(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.37033/ojce.v3i1.268

Monita, F. A., & Suharto, B. (2016). (2016). Identifikasi dan analisis miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan three-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument pada konsep kesetimbangan kimia. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 7(1), 27-38. 7(1).

Prayunisa, F., & Mahariyanti, E. (2022). Analisa Kesulitan Siswa Sma Kelas X Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia Pada Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning Berbasis Two Tier Multiple Choice Instrument. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 3(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v3i1.167

Rina Elvia, Amelia, T., & Handayani, D. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Metode Four-Tier Diagnostik Test Di Sma Negeri 03 Kota Bengkulu. Alotrop, 6(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.33369/alo.v6i2.25099

Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Kimia dan Instrumen Diagnosisnya: Literatur Review. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 17(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v17i1.34245

Romadhona, N., Qodriyah, L., Rokhim, D. A., Widarti, H. R., & Habiddin. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 4 MalangPada Materi Hidrokarbon Menggunakan InstrumenDiagnostik Three Tier. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(2), 2642–2651.

Sukmawati, W., Kadaroman, A., Suwarna, O., & Sopandi, W. (2020). Development of Teaching Materials Based on Conceptual Change Text on Redox Materials for Basic Chemicals on Redox Concept. Edusains, 12(2), 243–251.

Waruwu, M., Pendidikan, M. A., Kristen, U., & Wacana, S. (2023). Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif , Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi ( Mixed Method ). 7, 2896–2910.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

Tustari, R., Herman, M., Sari, D. A., Mawarnis, E. R., & Herman, H. (2025). Analysis of Student Misconceptions Using the Three-tier Diagnostic Test on Atomic Structure Class X Material at SMA N 1 Lintau Buo. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 13(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v13i1.14633

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): February 2025

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.