Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran LC Dipadu Diagram Alir terhadap Kualitas Proses dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa

Authors

  • Suryati Suryati IKIP Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v1i1.574

Keywords:

Learning Cycle, diagram alir, kualitas proses pembelajaran, hasil belajar

Abstract

Lajureaksi merupakan salah satu pokok bahasan yang dianggap sulit oleh siswa, karena karakteristik konsep-konsep dalam materi laju reaksi yang pada umumnya merupakan konsep-konsep yang abstrak dan melibatkan perhitungan-perhitungan kimia yang cukup sulit serta siswa harus memahami konsep lain yang mendasarinya seperti stoikiometri dan konsentrasi. Model pembelajaran Learning Cycle (LC) dipadu dengan diagram alir dipandang potensial efektif untuk meningkatkan kualitas proses pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Learning Cycle dipadu dengan   diagram alir terhadap kualitas proses dan hasil belajar kimia siswa kelas XI SMAN2Malang.Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan deskriptif dan rancangan eksperimen semu. Penelitian dilaksanakan di SMAN 2 Malang, pengambilan sampel ditentukan dengan teknik purposive random sampling, memilih 2 kelas yaitu kelas XI-A1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle dipadu dengan diagram alir sedangkan kelas XI-A2 sebagai kelas kontrol dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle saja pada materi laju reaksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Pada materi laju reaksi hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran LC dipadudiagram alir lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran LC saja, dan 2) Pada materi laju reaksi kualitas proses pembelajaran siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran LC dipadu dengan diagram alir dan pembelajaran model LC saja sama-sama berlangsung dengan baik.

 

Author Biography

Suryati Suryati, IKIP Mataram

Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia

References

Beistel, D.W. 1975. A Piagetian Approach to General Chemistry.Journal of Chemical Education, 52 (3): 151-152.

Bucat, B. & Shand, T. 1996.Thinking Task in Chemistry: Teaching for Understanding. Departement of Chemistry, Nedlands: Western Australia.

Cakmakci, D., Donnelly, J., & Leach, J. 2003. A cross-sectional study of the understanding of the relationships between concentration and reaction rate among Turkish secondary and undergraduate students.European Science Educational Research Association (ESERA) conference.

Cottrell, S.A.& McNamara, D.S. 2002. Cognitive Precursors to Science Comprehension, (Online), (http://csep.psyc.memphis.edu/cohmetric/cottrell_McNamara_CogSci_final.pdf), diakses 9 Agustus 2010.

Davidowitz, B. & Rollnick, M. 2001.Effectiveness of Flow Diagrams as a Strategy for Learning in Laboratories.AustralianJournal of Education in Chemistry. 57: 18-24.

Davidowitz, B. & Rollnick, M. 2005.Development and Application of a Rubric for Analysis of Novice Students’ Laboratory Flow Diagrams.InternationalJournal of Science Education. 27(1): 43-59.

Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum 2006 Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Kimia Sekolah Menengah Atas dan Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum Balitbang.

Eggen, P.D. & Kauchak, D.P. 1996.Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skill. (Third edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Fajaroh, F. & Dasna, I.W. 2007.Pembelajaran dengan Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle).Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. LP3 UM: UM Press.

Good, R, Kromhout, R.A. & Melon, E.K. 1979. Piaget’s Work and Chemical Education.Journal of Chemical Education, 57 (7): 426-430.

Herron, J.D. 1975.Piaget for Chemists Explaining What “Good†Student Cannot Understand.Journal of Chemical Education, 52 (3): 146-150.

Johnstone, A.H. 1997. ChemistryTeaching-Science or Alchemy? Journal of chemical Education, 76(3): 262-268.

Kean, E & Middlecamp, C. 1985.Panduan

BelajarKimia Dasar.Jakarta:

Gramedia.

Lawson, A.E. 1989. A Theory of Instruction: Using The Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills. NARST Monograph, Number One.

Lorsbach, A.W. 2002. The Learning Cycle as a Tool for Planning Science

Instruction.(Online),

(http: //www.coe.ilstu.edu/scienceed/lorsbach/257lrcy.html),diakses 5 Agustus 2010).

Meester, M.A.M. & Maskill, R. 1995. First Year Chemistry Practicals at Universities in England and Wales: Aims and the Scientific Level of Experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5): 575-588.

Mngomezulu. 1993. Use of a Flow Diagram to Do Practical Work. Paper Presented at the 15 th National Conventation of Mathematic and Natural Science Education. South Africa: University of Arrange Free State.

Nakhleh, B.M. 1994 Chemical Education in the Laboratory Environment. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(3): 201-205.

Nasution.2000. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Slabaugh, W.H. & Parsons, T.D.1976.General Chemistry.3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Slavin, R.E. 1995.Cooperative Learning, 2nd. Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Soebagio, Rukmini, Widayati, N.S., Suryadharma, I.B. 2000.Penggunaan Siklus Belajar dan Peta Konsep untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Konsep Larutan Asam-Basa.PPGSM.

Stuessy, C.L. & Metty, J.S. 2007. The Learning Research Cycle: Bridging Research and Practice. Journal Science Teacher Education. Vol 18: 725-750.

Wiersman. 1991. Research Method in Education. (5thed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Winkel, W.S. 1987. Psikologi Pendidikan dan

Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Wiseman, F.L. 1981. Teaching of College Chemistry, Role of Student Development Level.Journal of Chemical Education, 58 (6): 484-488.

Downloads

Published

2013-06-03

How to Cite

Suryati, S. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran LC Dipadu Diagram Alir terhadap Kualitas Proses dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 1(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v1i1.574

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.