Enhancing Students' Science Process Skills through the Implementation of POGIL-based General Chemistry Experiment Manual: A Quantitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i2.7498Keywords:
general chemistry, POGIL, experiment manual, science process skillsAbstract
This study focuses on the development of a POGIL-based experiment manual for general chemistry courses to enhance students' science process skills. The research and development (R&D) method, utilizing the Plomp model, was employed to create a valid and practical manual. Data were collected through a validity and practicality questionnaire, which was then analyzed using the Kappa Cohen's method. The manual's content was found to be highly valid, with an average score of 0.82, while its graphics had an average score of 0.84, also falling within the high category. Practicality was assessed through small group student testing, revealing high practicality scores in terms of user convenience, attractiveness, and benefits, with an average score of 0.77. Overall, the results indicate that the POGIL-based general chemistry experiment manual developed in this study is both valid and practical.
References
A. Chase, D. Pakhira, M. S. (2013). Implementing process-oriented, guided-inquiry learning for the first time: Adaptations and short-term impacts on students’ attitude and performance. J Chem Educ, 90, 409–416.
A. Straumanis. (2010). Classroom Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. Metrop Univ, 17.
American Chemical Society. (2015). ACS Guidelines for Chemistry in Two-Year College Programs. Society Committee on Education. http://portal.acs.org/portal/PublicWebSite/education/policies/twoyearcollege/CSTA_015380
Arindawati, A., & Huda, H. (2004). Beberapa Alternatif Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Bayu-media Publishing.
D. Branan & M. Morgan. (2010). Mini-lab activities: Inquiry-based lab activities for formative assessment. J Chem Educ, 87, 69–72.
Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran Mengajar Konten dan Keterampilan Berpikir. PT Indeks.
Farrell, J. J., Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (1999). A Guided Inquiry General Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(2–4), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p570
G.Berberoglu, E. A. K. &. (2014). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6th Grade Turkish Students’ Achievement, Science Process Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science,â€. Int J Sci Educ, 36, 66–78.
Gunawan, Harjono, A., Hermansyah, & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided inquiry model through virtual laboratory to enhance students’ science process skills on heat concept. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345
Hein, S. M. (2012). Positive impacts using POGIL in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100217v
Kuhlthau, C. (2001). Guided Inquiry: School Libraries in the 21st Century. School Libraries Worldwide, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29173/slw6797
M.U Maharani. (2013). Pengembangan Petunjuk Praktikum IPA Terpadu Tema Fotosintesis Berbasis Learning Cycle untuk Siswa SMP. Universitas Negeri Malang.
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Lessons in biostatistics interrater reliability : the kappa statistic. Biochemica Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395
Moog, R. S., Creegan, F. J., Hanson, D. M., Spencer, J. N., & Straumanis, A. R. (2006). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: POGIL and the POGIL Project. Metropolitan Universities, 17(4), 41–52. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.ignacio.usfca.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ878206&site=ehost-live&scope=site%5Cnhttp://muj.uc.iupui.edu/abstracts/v17_n4.htm
Mu’minin, A. A., Dasna, I. W., & Suharti, S. (2020). Efektivitas POGIL pada Pembelajaran Kesetimbangan Kimia terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Kemampuan Awal Berbeda. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 8(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v8i1.2659
Mudjijo. (1995). Tes Hasil Belajar. Bumi Aksara.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Educational Design Research Educational Design Research. Educational Design Research, 1–206. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766
Rachmawaty, D. U., Wijaya, A. R., & Dasna, I. W. (2021). Pengaruh Praktikum Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dengan Kemampuan Awal Berbeda. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(7), 1032. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i7.14911
Reynders, G., Suh, E., Cole, R. S., & Sansom, R. L. (2019). Developing Student Process Skills in a General Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10), 2109–2119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00441
Salirawati, D. (2008). Metode Pembelajaran Inovatif sebagai Magnet Belajar. Disajikan pada Lokakarya Metode Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Sistem Penilaiannya, Program Hibah Kompetisi (PHK). Jurdik Kimia FMIPA UNY.
Şen, Ş., Yılmaz, A., & Geban, Ö. (2015). the Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Environment on Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 66(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/15.66.54
Sukardi. (2011). Evaluasi Pendidikan, Prinsip, Dan Operasionalnya. Bumi Aksara.
Ural, E. (2016). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students’ Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
Veal, W. R., Taylor, D., & Rogers, A. L. (2009). Using self-reflection to increase science process skills in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(3), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p393
Wass, J. A. (2009). Statistics in a nutshell. In Scientific Computing (Vol. 26, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2000.12131286
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.