The Effectiveness of Student Worksheet Based on Scientific Literacy to Train Argumentation Skills on Factors that Affecting Reaction Rate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8596Keywords:
Effectiveness, Student Worksheet, Science Literacy, Argumentation.Abstract
References
Azmarita, T., Helmi, & Azis, A. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Luar Kelas Berbasis Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains XI MIPA SMAN 8 Maros. Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 15(April), 69–74.
Belland, B. R., & Kim, N. J. (2021). Predicting high school students’ argumentation skill using information literacy and trace data. Journal of Educational Research, 114(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1897967
Brady, J. E., Jespersen, N. D., & Hyslop, A. (2012). Chemistry : The Molecular Nature of Matter (6th editio, Issue 1). JohnWiley and Sons, Inc. https://www.academia.edu/40078040/James_E_Brady_The_Molecular_Nature_of_Matter_6th_Edition_Copia
Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00167j
Dale, H. S. (2012). Book of Learning Theories An Educational Perspective - Indonesian Version (E. Setyowati, E. Hamdiah, & R. Fajar (eds.)). Pustaka Pelajar.
Delfita, R., Setiawati, F., Marneli, D., & Putra, A. I. (2021). Relationship Between Scientific Argumentation Skills and Students’ Scientific Literacy Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 52–58. http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/JPB%0Ahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education Perspectives from Classrom-Based Research. University of Bristol.
Fadlika, R., Hernawati, D., & Meylani, V. (2022). Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas XI MIPA Pada Materi Sel. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v12i1.156
Imansari, M., Sumarni, W., & Sudarmin. (2018). Analisis Literasi Kimia Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Bermuatan Etnosains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(2), 2201–2211.
Izzatunnisa, Yayuk, A., & Aliefman, H. (2019). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Pembelajaran Penemuan untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik pada Materi Kimia SMA. Pijar MIPA, 14(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.29303/ jpm.v14i2.1240
Jannati, S. F., & Rusmini. (2022). Student Worksheets Based on Science Literacy to Practice Students’ Argumentation Skills on Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.23960/jppk.v11.i1.2022.02
Khair, B. N., Astria, F. P., Wardani, K. S. K., Nurwahidah, N., & Sriwarthini, N. L. P. N. (2021). Pengembangan LKPD Literasi Sains Berbasis Lesson Study for Learning Community (LSLC). Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 16(1), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i1.2297
Kulisah, Juanda, A., & Ekanara, B. (2023). HUBUNGAN KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SAINS DENGAN KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI SISWA KELAS X PADA MATERI KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI SMAN 1 ARJAWINANGUN. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 3, 1–5.
Kusdiningsih, Zakia, E., Abdurrahman, & Jalmo, T. (2019). Penerapan LKPD Berbasis Kemampuan Argumentasi-SWH Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Tertulis Dan Literasi Sains Siswa. 3(2252), 58–66. http://www.tjyybjb.ac.cn/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=9987
Lismawati, L., Hasnunidah, N., & Abdurrahman, A. (2021). Design and Validation of Science Student Worksheet based on Argument Driven Inquiry to Improve Argumentation Skills for Junior High School Students. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.22079
Mellenia, R. P. A., & Admoko, S. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pembelajaran Diskusi Berbasis Pola Argumentasi Toulmin untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v6i2.5248
Nismalasari, Santiani, & Rohmadi, H. M. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pokok bahasan Getaran Harmonis. Edusains, 4(3), 74–94.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 released field trial cognitive items. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment 2015, 1–89. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/PISA2015-Released-FT-Cognitive-Items.pdf
OECD. (2018). Pisa National Project Manager Manual. Pisa 2018, 1(March 2017), 1–162. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-NATIONAL-PROJECT-MANAGER-MANUAL.pdf
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research.
Saputri, I., Effendi, H., & Yusnelti. (2018). Perbandingan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Menggunakan Model Guided Discovery Learning dan Direct Intruction pada Materi Laju Reaksi Kelas XI IPA di SMAN 8 Kota Jambi. https://repository.unja.ac.id/3775/%0Ahttps://repository.unja.ac.id/3775/%0Ahttps://repository.unja.ac.id/3775/1/ARTIKEL .pdf
Sugiyono. (2007). STATISKA UNTUK PENELITIAN (E. Mulyatiningsih (ed.)). CV ALFABETA.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Yudistira, A. B., & Fauziah, H. N. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 1–8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.