Validity of Student Worksheet Based on Scientific Literacy to Train Argumentation Skills on Buffer Solution

Authors

  • Maya Kumalasari State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Suyono Suyono Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Macthematic and Science, State University of Surabaya, Jl. Ketintang, Gayungan, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia 60231, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8635

Keywords:

student worksheet, scientific literacy, argumentation skills, buffer solution

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to produce student worksheet based on scientific literacy to train argumentation skills on buffer solution seen from content and construct validation. The research subject were high school students grade XI. This research is development research with the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) which is limited to the development stage to find out the validation of student worksheet. The instrument used to obtain validity data (content and construct) is a validation sheet. The validity of the developed student worksheet is based on the assessment of three validators through expert judgment namely two chemistry lecturers and one chemistry teacher. Student worksheet based on scientific literay is declared the validity criteria if it gets a minimum assessment mode of 4 (valid) from a range of 1 to 5 on a Likert scale. The results showed that all components of the assessment both content validity (relevance) and construct validity (consistency) received an assessment mode of 4 with a valid category. So that the student worksheet based on scientific literacy was declared valid to train argumentation skills on buffer solution.

References

Afni, A. N., & Suyono. (2022). Kelayakan Lembar Penugasan Terstruktur pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 16-25.

Arryanto, Y., Sulawatty, A., Rahman, A., Artsanti, P., & Yohan. (2006). Strategi Pengembangan Ilmu Kimia Indonesia. Jakarta: RISTEK.

Asrofi, E. (2010). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri (PBI) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis bagi Peserta Didik Kelas X SMKN 4 Malang. SEMNAS MIPA. Hal. 28–36.

Branch, Robert Maribe. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Spinger Science & Business Media

Devi, N. D. C., Susanti, E., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia), 3(3), 152-159.

Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAP into Argumentation:

Development in the Application of Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education.

Fadlika, R. H., Hernawati, D., & Meylani, V. (2022). Kemampuan Argumentasi dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas XI MIPA Pada Materi Sel. Lensa (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(1), 9-18.

Handayani, N.N.L. (2015). Membangun Masyarakat Melek Sains Berkarakter Bangsa Melalui Pembelajaran. Proceedings Seminar Nasional FMIPA UNDIKSHA V, 364-368.

Hanri, C., Rosli, M. S., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Ismail, N., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2019). Scientific Argumentation Practice and Verbal Interaction in Chemistry Classroom Among 10th Grade Students. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 733-738.

Hasibuan, M. H. E., Harizon, Ngatijo, & Fuldiaratman. (2019). Efektifitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi di Kota Jambi. Talenta Conference Series: Science and Technology (ST), 2(2), 1-11.

Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual Versus Group Argumentation: Student’s Performance in a Malaysian Context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109-124.

Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi pada Isu Sosiosainfik Konsumsi Genetically Modified Organism (GMO). JPPI 3(1), 51–59.

Irvan, A., & Admoko, S. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Berbasis Pola Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP) Menggunakan Model Argument Driven Inquiry dan Diskusi pada Pembelajaran Fisika SMA. IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 318-324.

Kusdiningsih, E. Z., Jalmo, T., & Agung, J. (2016). Penerapan LKPD Berbasis Kemampuan Argumentasi-SWH untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Tertulis dan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 6(2), 101-110.

Manz, E. (2015). Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590.

Mcneill, K. (2011). Elementary Students’ Views of Explanation, Argumentation, and Evidence, and Their Abilities to Construct Arguments Over The School Year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823.

Merta, I. W., Artayasa, I. P., Kusmiyati, K., Lestari, N., & Setiadi, D. (2020). Profil Literasi Sains dan Model Pembelajaran dapat Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(3), 223-228.

Muna, Aulia Nihayatul, & Rusmini. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 1(2), 159-171.

Newman, I., Lim, J., & Pineda, F. (2011). Content Validity using Mixed Methods Approach: Its application and development through the use of a Table of Specifications Methodology. American Evaluation Association, 7(3), 1-27.

Nieveen, N. (2010). Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at Shanghai (PR China): The East China Normal University.

Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Penguasan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP Pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen. Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974-978.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Draft Science Famework. Paris: OECD

Pisa. (2015). Draft Science Framework. PISA OECD.

Probosari, Riezky Maya, Murni Ramli, Harmita, Meti Indrowati, dan Sajidan. (2016). Profil Keterampilan Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS Pada Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 29-33.

Riduwan. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Roesminingsih & Susarno, L. H. (2016). Teori dan Praktek Pendidikan. Surabaya: Lembaga Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan.

Roviati, E., & Widodo, A. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11(2), 56-66.

Sanubari, F., Yamtinah, S., & Redjeki, T. (2014). Penerapan metode pembelajaran tutor teman sebaya dilengkapi dengan media interaktif flash untuk meningkatkan minat dan prestasi belajar siswa kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Sukoharjo tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 pada materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(4), 145–154.

Suyono, & Hariyanto. (2015). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Westen, Drew & Robert R. (2003). Quantifying Construct Validity: Two Simple Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 608-6018.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-24

How to Cite

Kumalasari, M., & Suyono, S. (2023). Validity of Student Worksheet Based on Scientific Literacy to Train Argumentation Skills on Buffer Solution. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 11(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i4.8635

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023): August 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.