The Analysis of Chemistry Test Item Difficulty on XI MIPA Year-End Assessment at SMAN 8 Pontianak

Authors

  • Pitra Dewi Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tanjungpura University of Education, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Nawawi, Indonesia 78124
  • Hairida Hairida Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tanjungpura University of Education, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Nawawi, Indonesia 78124, Indonesia
  • Rahmat Rasmawan Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tanjungpura University of Education, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Nawawi, Indonesia 78124, Indonesia
  • Masriani Masriani Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tanjungpura University of Education, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Nawawi, Indonesia 78124, Indonesia
  • Tulus Junanto Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tanjungpura University of Education, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Nawawi, Indonesia 78124, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i5.8881

Keywords:

chemistry test, difficulty, year-end assessment

Abstract

This study aims to categorize the level of difficulty of the questions and describe the cognitive level of the KKO indicators of the 2021/2022 year-end assessment (PAT) of chemistry class XI MIPA at SMAN 8 Pontianak. This research is quantitative descriptive. Data collection techniques were interviews and documentation. Documentation was obtained from chemistry teachers through google forms containing answers and PAT questions. The research subjects amounted to 150 students of class XI MIPA who had taken the End of Year Assessment. The results of the research obtained are difficult categories totaling 4 questions (13.3%), moderate 10 questions (33.3%) and easy 16 questions (53.4%). The results of the analysis obtained in order to improve the distribution of the difficulty level of questions in the future.

Author Biography

Pitra Dewi, Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tanjungpura University of Education, Jl. Prof. Dr. H. Nawawi, Indonesia 78124

Departement of chemistry education

References

Abidin, Z. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Konseptual dan Algoritma Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-soal Kimia Materi Pokok Hidrolisis Garam pada Kelas XI IPA1 SMA Negeri 1 Wolowa Kabupaten Buton. In jurnal Pendidikan Kimia. Universitas Halu Oleo: Vol. Vol. 4 (Issue No. 1, p. hal. 22-30).

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Bumi Aksara. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpk.v2i2.21170

Bagiyono. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Sial Ujian Pelatihan Radiografi Tingkat 1. Widyanuklida, 16(No. 1), 1–12. http://repo-nkm.batan.go.id/140/1/05_analisis_tingkat_kesukaran.pdf

Dewi, P., Elvia, R., & Studi Pendidikan Kimia Jurusan PMIPA FKIP, P. (2021). Pengembangan Butir Soal Hots untuk Menguji Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa di MA Negeri 2 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(2), 141–148.

Fitrianawati, M. (2017). Peran Analisis Butir Soal Guna Meningkatkan Kualitas Butir Soal, Kompetensi Guru dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. JPT : Jurnal Pendidikan Tematik, 2(3), 316–322. http://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/9117

Fuadi, T. R. (2021). Fuadi, T. R. Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) Semester Genap Tahun 2020 pada Pembelajaran Daring Kimia Kelas XI Berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi (Bachelor’s thesis, Jakarta: FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta). (Vol. 26, Issue 2) [FITK UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. http://www.ufrgs.br/actavet/31-1/artigo552.pdf

Genes, A. J., Lukum, A., & Laliyo, L. A. R. (2021). Identifikasi Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Larutan Penyangga Siswa di Gorontalo. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 3(2), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v3i2.11911

Hamid, F. Al, Manoppo, Y., & Kayadoe, V. (2018). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Akhir Semester ( Tas ) Kimia Sma Negeri Ii Ambon Tahun Pelajaran 2014 / 2015. MJoCE, 8(2), 89–93.

Hariani, W., Laliyo, L. A. R., & Musa, W. J. A. (2016). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konseptual dan Algoritmik Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Reaksi Redoks. Jurnal Entropi, 111(2), 196–204.

Hidayanti, F. (2021). Kimia Dasar: Konsep Materi. LP_UNAS.

Himmah, W. I. (2019). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Level Berpikir. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i1.698

Marlina, E. (2020). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbantuan Aplikasi Sevima Edlink. Jurnal Padegogik, 3(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i2.2339

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252

Parastuti, W. I., & Ibnu, S. (2016). Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi. Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(12), 2307–2313.

Prabayanti, N. M. D., Sudiana, I. K., & Wiratini, N. M. (2018). Analisis Tes Ulangan Kenaikan Kelas Buatan Guru Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v2i1.14127

Priyasmika, R., & Sholichah, N. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi pada Materi Hidrolisis Garam Menggunakan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Four Tier. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 19–28.

Qadri, R. A. Al, Alhaq, P. M., Muthmainnah, N., Irpadilla, M. A., Herlina, Aulia, N., & Scholten, A. R. (2019). Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMAN 1 Gowa pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Menggunakan Instrumen Three Tier Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 7(1), 46–52.

Rasmuin, R., Jais, E., & Wahyuni, A. A. S. M. (2021). Reliabilitas Tes Buatan Guru Mata Pelajaran Matematika Menurut Teori Tes Klasik Tingkat SMP Di Kota Baubau. Jurnal Akademik Pendidikan Matematika, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.55340/japm.v7i2.465

Risnawati, & Parham, S. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Hasil Belajar melalui Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving ( CPS) pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 7(2), 127–134.

Rosa, N. M. (2015). Pengaruh Sikap Pada Pelajaran Kimia dan Konsep Diri Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kimia. Jurnal Formatif, 2(3), 218–226.

Ruhil, Ningsih, Y. S., & Fajriah. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kesulitan Soal Ujian Semester Ganjil Bahasa Indonesia Kelas V MIN 2 Banda Aceh Pada Tahun 2019. 1–19.

Simamora, H., Hartono, H., & Effendi, E. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Buatan Guru Kimia Pada Tes Ujian Tengah Semester Ganjil Kelas XII MIPA. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v9i1.3701

Soyomukti, N. (2016). Teori-Teori Pendidikan: Dari Tradisional, (Neo) Liberal, Marxis-Sosialia, Hingga Postmodern. Ar Ruzz Media.

Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ulfah, T., Rusman, & Khaldun, I. (2016). Analisa kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan pada Siswa SMA Inshafuddin Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia, 1(4), 43–51. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/pendidikan-kimia/article/view/1349

Yonelia, V., & Haryati, S. (2015). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Kimia Kelas X IPA SMA PGRI Pekanbaru Tahun Ajaran 2013 / 2014 Pelajaran Kimia Kelas X IPA SMA PGRI. Journal Online Mahasiswa Bidang Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 1–15.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-10-02

How to Cite

Dewi, P., Hairida, H., Rasmawan, R., Masriani, M., & Junanto, T. (2023). The Analysis of Chemistry Test Item Difficulty on XI MIPA Year-End Assessment at SMAN 8 Pontianak. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 11(5), 676–685. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i5.8881

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2023): October 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data: Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default) Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.