Online Vs In-Class: EFL Students’ Oral Presentation Preferences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v11i2.12460

Keywords:

In-class, Online, Oral Presentation, Preference

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the preferences and experiences of students with regards to in-class oral presentations as opposed to online oral presentations in English class. The participants for this study were 61 students selected purposively, with a concentration on students in their fourth semester at the Faculty of Health Sciences. The data were collected using a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The results show that students have a strong preference for online presentations, both in terms of general satisfaction and ease of preparation, indicating the perceived advantages of the online format over traditional in class presentations. The majority of students believe that online presentations improve their communication skills. The findings have important implications for educators and institutions seeking to improve the effectiveness of oral presentation methods.

References

Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505).

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470

Bączek, M., Zagańczyk-Bączek, M., Szpringer, M., Jaroszyński, A., & Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. (2021). Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine (United States), 100(7), E24821. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024821

Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1).

Banna, J., Lin, M.-F. G., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. In MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching (Vol. 11, Issue 2).

Bao, W. (2020). COVIDâ€19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2015). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Brooks, G., & Wilson, J. (2014). Using oral presentations to improve students’ English language skills. In Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review (Vol. 19).

Clark-Ibáñez, M., & Scott, L. (2008). Learning to teach online. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 34–41.

Coelho, C. M., & Balaban, C. D. (2015). Visuo-vestibular contributions to anxiety and fear. Journal of Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 48, 148–159.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Desiging and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.

de Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284

Dewaele, J.-M., Witney, J., Saito, K., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676–697.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018a). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 452–465.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018b). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 452–465.

Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.

Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning supporting and engaging the isolated learner. In Journal of Learning Design Gillett-Swan (Vol. 10, Issue 1).

Holland, L. C. (2014). Student online presentations and peer evaluations in a face-to-face case class. Journal of Financial Education, 40(2), 45–67.

Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285

Kim, S. (2006). Academic oral communication needs of East Asian international graduate students in non-science and non-engineering fields. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 479–489.

Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Dunlap, J. C. (2017). Live synchronous web meetings in asynchronous online courses: Reconceptualizing virtual office hours. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1285

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. (Issue 3). http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335

Martin, F., Budhrani, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Examining faculty perception of their readiness to teach online. Online Learning Journal, 23(3), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1555

Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012). Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 228–261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174

Mohamad, A. R., Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., & Sazalli, N. A. H. (2023). Investigating speaking anxiety among pre-service ESL teachers in oral presentation. Proceedings of International Conference of Research on Language Education (I-RoLE 2023), 13-14 March, 2023, Noble Resort Hotel Melaka, Malaysia, 7, 424–434. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.38

Panayiotou, G., Karekla, M., Georgiou, D., Constantinou, E., & Paraskeva-Siamata, M. (2017). Psychophysiological and self-reported reactivity associated with social anxiety and public speaking fear symptoms: Effects of fear versus distress. Psychiatry Research, 255, 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.044

Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 6(2), 168–171.

Radzuan, N. R. M., Fauzi, W. J., Zahari, H., & Ramli, M. (2023). Tertiary students perceptions of learning oral presentation skills in in-class and online learning environment: A case study. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 29(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2023-2901-12

Shao, K., Yu, W., & Ji, Z. (2013). An exploration of Chinese EFL students’ emotional intelligence and foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12042.x

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Springer New York.

Zakaria, W. N. F. W., & Razak, S. S. (2016). English as a second language (ESL) learner’s perceptions of the difficulties in oral commentary assessment. Journal of Contemporary Social Science Research, 1(1), 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

How to Cite

Rohmah, F. N. (2024). Online Vs In-Class: EFL Students’ Oral Presentation Preferences. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 11(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v11i2.12460

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.