A Narrative Inquiry into the Roles of Debate in Developing an Indonesian EFL Teacher’s English Language Proficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i1.15276Keywords:
Academic Skills, Debate, English Language Proficiency, Narrative InquiryAbstract
This narrative inquiry delves into how debate plays critical roles in developing an Indonesian EFL teacher’s English language proficiency. One female EFL teacher was purposefully recruited as the participant. Data were obtained through written reflections and semi-structured interviews. An inductive thematic analysis was then employed to analyze the data. The findings suggest that debate plays critical roles in promoting target language exposure, facilitating target language use, and becoming a conducive language learning environment, ultimately advancing English language proficiency. Debate is perceived to enhance vocabulary, rhetoric, and four main language skills: reading, writing, speaking, and listening. In addition to developing language proficiency, debate promotes essential academic skills, including arguing, public speaking, and critical thinking. Despite its advantages, encountered challenges can still be overcome. These findings highlight the transformative potentials of debate as a pedagogical strategy, underscoring its capacity to enhance language and academic skills. However, due to its limited generalizability, future studies should employ potential research designs and recruit diverse participants across various settings.
References
Aclan, E. M., & Aziz, N. H. A. (2015). Exploring parliamentary debate as a pedagogical tool to develop English communication skills in EFL/ESL classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.2p.1
Adhikari, S. P. (2021). Revealing the story of an individual through narrative inquiry: A methodological review. Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 6(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.3126/ire.v6i1.43425
Agustina, L., & Bahrani, B. (2016). The implementation of British parliamentary debating in Mulawarman Debate Society (MDS). Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.6
Ahmed, N. E. M. (2020). The value of debates by EFL tertiary students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(4), 37–45.
Amalia, R. M., & Hamzah, Y. (2016). Hedges in world university parliamentary English debate championships: A pragmatic study. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v6i1.12562
Arung, F., & Jumardin, J. (2016). Improving the students’ speaking skill through debate technique. Journal of English Education, 1(1), 70–76.
Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2024). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003356394
Butina, M. (2015). A narrative approach to qualitative inquiry. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 28(3), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.28.3.190
Canh, L. V., & Renandya, W. A. (2017). Teachers’ English proficiency and classroom language use: A conversation analysis study. RELC Journal, 48(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690935
Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education, 27(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X060270010301
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
Clandinin, D. J., Huber, J., Steeves, P., & Li, Y. (2011). Becoming a narrative inquirer: Learning to attend within the three-dimensional narrative inquiry space. In S. Trahar (Ed.), Learning and teaching narrative inquiry: Travelling in the borderlands (pp. 33–51). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Daud, A. (2021). Becoming an English teacher: An autobiographical narrative inquiry. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.405
Faez, F., Karas, M., & Uchihara, T. (2019). Connecting language proficiency to teaching ability: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819868667
Firmansyah, D., & Vegian, E. E. V. (2019). Improving the students’ speaking skill through debate technique. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(6), 891–895. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i6.p891-895
Freeman, D. (2017). The case for teachers’ classroom English proficiency. RELC Journal, 48(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217691073
Fuadah, U., Rachmajanti, S., & Ivone, F. M. (2020). Australasian parliamentary debate strategy to foster students’ speaking competence. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(4), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i4.13327
Gill, M. J., Gill, D. J., & Roulet, T. J. (2017). Constructing trustworthy historical narratives: Criteria, principles, and techniques. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12262
Hadi, M. S., Izzah, L., & Maharani, A. (2021). Learning analysis of EFL students’ debate activity by using British parliamentary for enhancing speaking ability and critical thinking. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v4i1.1307
Harsch, C. (2017). Proficiency. ELT Journal, 71(2), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw067
Hetharie, A. T., Listyani, L., & Setyarini, M. C. E. (2020). The benefits of joining English Debating Society (EDS) for students’ speaking skills. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning, 23(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i2.2504
Iman, J. N. (2017). Debate instruction in EFL classroom: Impacts on the critical thinking and speaking skill. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1046a
Jeyasundaram, J., Cao, L. Y. D., & Trentham, B. (2020). Experiences of intergenerational trauma in second-generation refugees: Healing through occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 87(5), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417420968684
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., Trianawaty, T., Triwidayati, K. R., & Jemadi, F. (2019). English proficiency of secondary school teachers in Indonesia. Beyond Words, 7(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v7i2.1950
Lindsay, G. M., & Schwind, J. K. (2016). Narrative inquiry: Experience matters. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 48(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562116652230
Majidi, A. E., Graaff, R. D., & Janssen, D. (2020). Debate as L2 pedagogy: The effects of debating on writing development in secondary education. Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 804–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12673
Majidi, A. E., Janssen, D., & Graaff, R. D. (2021). The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education. System, 101, 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102576
Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 60–71.
Metersky, K., Tan, V., Al-Hamad, A., Catallo, C., Koller, D., & Patel, K. (2023). Exploration of the advanced preparation nurseâ€mother role in care of children with chronic disease: A narrative inquiry. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 33(4), 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16981
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
Nasriandi, N., & Masruddin, M. (2021). The use of British parliamentary debate style. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics, and Literature, 9(1), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i1.2073
Nhung, P. T. H. (2017). General English proficiency or English for teaching? The preferences of in-service teachers. RELC Journal, 49(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217691446
Peterson, B. L. (2017). Thematic analysis/Interpretive thematic analysis. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–9). Wiley-Blackwell.
Qaissi, A. (2024). Exploring thematic analysis in qualitative research. In B. Bentalha & L. Alla (Eds.), Data collection and analysis in scientific qualitative research (pp. 253–294). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8689-7.ch010
Qomariah, I., Syauki, S., & Anasy, Z. (2020). The effect of the Australasian parliamentary debate technique on students’ argumentative speaking ability. IJEE: Indonesian Journal of English Education, 7(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v7i1.16973
Rear, D. (2017). Critical thinking, language, and problem-solving: Scaffolding thinking skills through debate. In R. Breeze & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching (pp. 51–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40956-6_4
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 618–629. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, pedagogy, and performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690059
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Suharsih, S., & Supriatna, Y. (2020). Speaking activities in English debating club: Study at English conversation and debating club of SMKN 1 Pandeglang. JELTS: Journal of English Language Teaching and Cultural Studies, 3(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.48181/jelts.v3i2.9348
Suhendra, E. (2020). Parliamentary English debate within communicative language teaching context: A personal reflection. Edulangue: Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.20414/edulangue.v3i1.2033
Syahputra, M., & Chaira, S. (2020). The cultivation of students’ problem-solving skill through Asian Parliamentary Debate System (APDS). Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i1.1047
Tamah, S. M., & Lie, A. (2019). Analysis of a research instrument to map English teachers’ proficiency. IJEE: Indonesian Journal of English Education, 6(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v6i1.11888
Tianame, M., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). The implementation of debate technique to enhance students’ speaking skill. English Education Journal, 10(2), 180–195.
Wahyuni, S., Qamariah, H., Gani, S. A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Syahputra, M. (2019). Critical thinking skills: British parliamentary debate system to improve English as Foreign Language (EFL) students’ critical speaking. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute Journal: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i3.444
Wahyuni, S., Qamariah, H., Syahputra, M., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Gani, S. A. (2020). Challenges and solutions to develop critical thinking with the British parliamentary debate system in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 137–156.
Widiawati, P. S., Ratminingsih, N. M., & Agustini, D. A. E. (2020). The effect of debate technique towards eleventh grade students’ speaking competency. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.26989
Wijaya, S. A. (2016). The use of teaching British parliamentary debate through Android application, video, and PowerPoint presentation to improve the students’ speaking skills. Register Journal, 9(2), 204–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v9i2.204-229
Yang, Y. T. C., & Gamble, J. (2013). Effective and practical critical thinking-enhanced EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 67(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct038
Yusuf, F. N., & Novita, O. E. (2020). EFL teachers’ perceived language proficiency and teaching effectiveness. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23208
Zhang, W. (2019). Narrative inquiry in TESOL and language teacher education. US-China Education Review A, 9(4), 182–191.
Zubair, S., & Moazzam, A. (2024). Exploring career construction: A single narrative case study guided by the systems theory framework of career development (STFCD). South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 13(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779241234135
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/Â (default)
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.