Perceptions of Technology Integration in Language Acquisition Among English Language Majors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i1.15378Keywords:
English Major Students, Technology in Language Learning, Student Perceptions, Educational Technology, Digital Learning ToolsAbstract
This research examines how English major students perceive the role of technology in their language learning. The study aims to investigate students’ opinions, the technological tools they commonly utilize, the benefits and challenges they perceive, and to provide recommendations for enhancing the integration of technology in English education. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive method, data were gathered through a structured questionnaire containing closed-ended using linkert scale and open-ended questions. The participants comprised students from the English Language Education program at STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang, specifically those enrolled from semesters 2 to 8 who have experience using technology for learning English. The findings reveal that students regularly use a variety of digital tools, such as mobile applications, to aid their English learning. Participants express favorable views on technology, emphasizing its role in improving vocabulary, grammar, writing, and listening skills. Moreover, technology is perceived as a motivator that enhances engagement, boosts self-confidence, and promotes autonomy in the learning experience. Nevertheless, obstacles persist, such as technical issues, digital distractions, and insufficient structured guidance from educators. The study emphasizes the necessity of institutional support, which includes technical assistance, teacher training, and efficient strategies to reduce distractions. It advocates for a blended learning approach that integrates technology with conventional face-to-face methods to foster a more adaptable and effective educational environment.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Al-Awidi, H. M., & Ismail, M. (2014). University students’ attitudes toward using technology in language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(10), 35–41.
Al-Azzam, N. (2021). The impact of gamification on student motivation and engagement in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520942706
Al Mahmud, A. (2018). Challenges of using mobile apps for language learning: A case study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(5), 1051–1061.
Almusharraf, N., & Khahro, S. H. (2020). Students’ satisfaction with online learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(21), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.15647
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Routledge.
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2019). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 28, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 1–10.
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2013). Integrating technology into language learning: Students’ perceptions and experiences. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 450–475.
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2020). The role of social media in enhancing Iranian EFL students’ English language skills. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 100–112.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 1–17.
Huang, Y.-M., Liaw, S.-S., & Lai, C.-M. (2019). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward mobile English learning. Computers & Education, 59, 112–120.
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating learner autonomy in the technology-enhanced language learning classroom. System, 90, 102232.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: Can mobile devices support language learning? ReCALL, 20(3), 271–282.
Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated learning in language learning: A literature review. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 299–324.
Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020, April 29). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
Nguyen, M., Walker, A., & Holmes, K. (2018). Learner autonomy and language learning technologies: A review of the literature. ReCALL, 30(1), 90–111.
Nguyen, T. L. A., & Habók, A. (2021). Digital literacy of students: An empirical study in Vietnamese universities. Libri, 72(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2020-0165
Park, S. Y. (2020). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(2), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118816951
Park, Y., & Son, J.-B. (2019). Students’ perception of mobile learning and its influence on language learning motivation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 1–12.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Rahmat, N. H., Ismail, S. A. M. M., Zainudin, F. S., & Khir, M. M. (2023). Exploring learner engagement in online ESL learning: A quantitative approach. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21145
Rasi, P., Vuojärvi, H., & Ruokamo, H. (2019). Multimodal learning and multimodal communication. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2311–2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09882-6
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). The theory and practice of autonomous learning: The role of language learners in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Stockwell, G. (2012). Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity and dynamism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tegos, S., Satratzemi, M., & Demetriadis, S. (2021). AI-enhanced language learning applications: A systematic review and future directions. Computers & Education, 168, 104209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104209
Vaughan, L. (2014). The role of technology in the development of language learners’ autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 852–861.
Wang, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2012). The effectiveness of mobile-assisted language learning in improving language skills: A review of research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 328–342.
Wang, Y., Chen, N.-S., & Levy, M. (2021). The effectiveness of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL): A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13014
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970
Yang, J. (2012). English learners’ perception of technology use in language learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 727–734.
Zou, B., Li, J., & Li, X. (2022). Digital language learning: A study of learners’ perceptions of collaborative and autonomous learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1–2), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744662
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/Â (default)
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
