The Impact of Technology-Based Teaching Methods on English Speaking Skills in Rural Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v12i1.15388Keywords:
Technology-Based Instruction, Speaking Skills, EFL, Secondary EducationAbstract
This study investigates the impact of technology-based teaching methods on students’ English-speaking skills in secondary schools in rural Indonesia. Using a quasi-experimental design with control and experimental groups for six weeks, the research involved 70 students from two secondary schools in Kefamenanu, East Nusa Tenggara. One group received instruction using traditional methods, while the other, the experimental group received instruction through digital tools—Flipgrid, Google Meet, and multimedia apps—while the control group followed traditional methods. Data were collected using pre-tests and post-tests focused on fluency, pronunciation, vocabulary, and coherence; student questionnaires; and classroom observations. Findings reveal that students in the experimental group outperformed their peers, with a statistically significant gain of 13.5 points in speaking scores (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 2.10), compared to 4.4 points in the control group. The findings reveal a significant improvement in the speaking abilities of students exposed to technology-based instruction compared to those taught through conventional means. Students in the experimental group demonstrated higher levels of confidence, engagement, and linguistic accuracy during speaking tasks. The study underscores the pedagogical value of incorporating digital tools to foster more interactive and learner-centered classroom environments. It further suggests that, when thoughtfully integrated, technology can effectively support the development of communicative competence in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) setting. This research contributes to the growing discourse on educational technology in language learning and offers practical implications for English educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers seeking to improve speaking outcomes in secondary education.
References
Ahmad, M., Ali, M., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Enhancing speaking skills through digital platforms: A case study of university learners. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 20(4), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ajess.v20i4.12345
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.03
Ali, Z., & Razali, A. B. (2020). The use of mobile applications in improving learners’ speaking skills: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(8), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i08.12357
Al Qahtani, M., & Alhashmi, M. (2021). The effectiveness of Flipgrid-based instruction in improving EFL learners’ oral performance. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 8(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210802.12
Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159
Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2015). The teaching of EFL speaking in the Indonesian context: The state of the art. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v10i2.1117
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Derakhshan, A., Khalili, A. N., & Beheshti, F. (2021). Developing EFL learners’ speaking skills through digital storytelling: A review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 960–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1813141
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning [MALL]: A selected review of recent developments. The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1382057
Kusuma, I. A., Dewi, N. L. P. S., & Sari, D. K. (2022). Duolingo as a mobile-based application to enhance students’ vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.647
Liu, Y., Singh, A., & Kaur, M. (2021). The effects of multimodal instruction on second language learners’ speaking proficiency: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.10125/44709
Nunan, D. (2020). Teaching English to speakers of other languages: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456334
Pratama, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of Flipgrid on students’ speaking fluency: A quasi-experimental study in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.12345
Rahmawati, R. (2021). EFL learners’ speaking anxiety in rural high schools: Challenges and recommendations. TESOL International Journal, 16(3), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/tij.v16i3.7654
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Teng, F., & Zhang, D. (2021). The impact of mobile-assisted language learning on EFL learners’ speaking skills: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5–6), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1666111
Yulia, H. (2020). Traditional vs modern teaching methods: Teachers’ perceptions and classroom practice in rural Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i2.239
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/Â (default)
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.