A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PQRST AND SQ3R STRATEGIES BASED ON THE TEXT TYPES UPON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPETENCY AT SMPN 4 SINGARAJA

Authors

  • Komang Dedy Sandiarsa IKIP Mataram, Indonesia
  • Dewa Komang Tantra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Ni Made Ratminingsih Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v1i1.2401

Keywords:

PQRST strategy, SQ3R strategy, Text Types, Reading Competency.

Abstract

This research aimed at investigating whether or not there is a different effect between PQRST and SQ3R strategies based on the text types upon the eighth grade students’ reading competency. This research was an experimental research with 2 X 2 factorial designs. The population was 6 classes (179 students) of grade VIII in SMPN 4 Singaraja in the academic year 2012/2013, in which 4 classes were sample of this research which was assigned into two groups, two classes with 60 students were PQRST strategy group, and two classes with 60 students were SQ3R strategy group determined by using a Multistage Random Sampling. The data were collected through reading comprehension test that were analyzed by using Statistical Two-Way ANOVA. The result shows that, first, FA = 31.533 with the significant value was 0.000 which was less than 0.5, therefore, there is a significance difference between the students who were taught by PQRST strategy than those who were taught by SQ3R strategy. Second, FAB = 2.624 with the significant value was 0.107 which was higher than 0.5, therefore, there is no interactional effect of teaching reading strategies (PQRST and SQ3R) and text types (narrative and recount) on students’ reading competency. 

References

Agbebire, J. 2012. Strategies for Academic Excellence Part 4. http://strategies-foracademic-excellence-part-4.htm. Accessed on 06 November 2012.

Depdiknas .2011. KurikulumSmp 1 Karangdadap (TahunPelajaran 2011/2012). P ekalongan. http://smpn1karangdadap.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/dokumen-ktsp1112.pdf. Accessed on 06 October 2012

.

Erawati, L. P. E. P. 2012. A Comparative

Effect of Metacognitive SelfMonitoring Strategies on Students’ Reading Competency Based on Text Types. Unpublished Thesis. Singaraja : PPs UNDIKSHA.

Haeriyanto, A. I. 2012. Improving the Reading Comprehension Skills of the Eleventh Graders of MA NurulJadidPaitonProbolinggo through PQRST Strategy. Thesis. Malang: PPs UniversitasNegeri Malang. http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/ disertasi/article/view/21593. Accessed on 05 November 2012.

Holandyah, 2012. Quantum Ilmu: PQRST T echnique. http://holandyah.blogspot.c om/2012/01/using-pqrst-technique-toincrease.html. Accessed on 05 November 2012.

Ikram. 2012. Strategy MembacaPemaham an. http://ikrammelan6kahm4ju.blogsp ot.com/2012/04/strategi-membacapemahaman.html. Accessed on 05 November 2012.

Joomla. 2012. PQRST Study Method. http:// www.campusgrotto.com/index2.php?o ption=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=316. Accessed on 05 November 2012

Karolina, I. 2006. Teaching Narrative Text in Improving Writing to the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 1 Petarukan, Pemalang. Thesis. Semarang: UniversitasNegeriSemarang. http://aguswuryanto.files.wordpre ss.com/2011/10/ptk-teachingnarrative-sma-petaruan.pdf. Accessed on 22 October 2012

Kartika, D. 2005. KeefektifanMetode PQRST dalamMembacaPemahamanTeksBacaanpada Mata PelajaranBahasa Indonesia Kelas VII Semester I SMP Negeri 1 Brangsong Kendal

Tahun Ajaran 2004-2005. Accessed on 05 November 2012.

Kusumaningrum, R. W. 2010. The Use of Preview, Question, Read, Self-Recite, Test (PQRST) Technique in Teaching

Reading Comprehension of News Item Texts (A Case Study of Grade X Students of SMA Negeri 2 Ungaran in the Academik Year 2009.2010).

Thesis. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/1007 2/1/1175a.pdf. Accessed on 13 November 2012.

Mabakejo, Ola. 2011. “Effects of S-Q-3-R and 3-S-3-R Study Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students’ Academic Achievement in Reading

Comprehensionâ€. Journal of the Nigeria English Studies Association (JNESA) 14:2. http://www. nigeriaenglish.com/content/v14/2/ola.pdf. Accessed on 27 October 2012.

Maula, M. Y. M. 2008. The Effectiveness of Using Authentic Materials in Teaching Recount Text to Improve Students’ Writing Ability (An Experimental study of the First Grade Students of SMA PGII 1 Bandung).Thesis. Jakarta: Indonesia University of Education. http://repository.upi.edu/operator/uplo ad/s_c0351_03345_chapter1.pdf. Accessed on 26 October 2012.

Syafitri, Dewi. 2010. The effect of PQRST Technique toward Reading Comprehension of the Second Grade Students at SMAN 1 Kota Jambi.

Thesis. Jambi: Jambi University. http:/ /www.usm.unsri.ac.id/upload/lampiran /201205040_abstrak_skripsi.pdf. Accessed on 05 November 2012.

Uno, B, H. 2009: TeoriMotivasi&Pengukurannya: Analisis di BidangPendidikan. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Walker, Barbara J. 2008. DiagnosticTeaching of Reading: Techniques for Instruction and Assessment (6tded). Ohio: Pearson Education Ltd

Downloads

Published

2020-02-27

How to Cite

Sandiarsa, K. D., Tantra, D. K., & Ratminingsih, N. M. (2020). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PQRST AND SQ3R STRATEGIES BASED ON THE TEXT TYPES UPON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPETENCY AT SMPN 4 SINGARAJA. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 1(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v1i1.2401

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2014)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.