Optimizing Assessment for Learning in Islamic Education through Authentic and Diagnostic Assessment : A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Nilna Fadlillah Universitas Qomaruddin Gresik, Indonesia
  • Kusaeri Kusaeri Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i2.11555

Keywords:

Assessment For Learning, Authentic Assessment, Diagnostic Assessment, Islamic Education.

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of research trends in authentic and diagnostic assessments, analyze the factors that influence their implementation and effectiveness, and the potential for optimizing both assessments to improve the quality of Islamic learning. Using the Systematic Literature Review method with Watase Uake and Publish or Perish tools, this study screened 825 articles according to PRISMA guidelines. After identifying, screening, and eligibility, 46 articles Scopus Indexed, Sinta 1, and Sinta 2 were selected for further mapping and thematic analysis. The results showed  that 1) the main trends of the research were related to the integration of technology in both assessments through e-portfolios and eDia System; 2) factors affecting effectiveness included validity and reliability of instruments, simplification of trials and validation, and integration of technology, while the obstacles were dominated by the lack of understanding of teachers, the complexity of procedures, and limited resources and time; 3) optimization steps included comprehensive training for teachers, development and validation of instruments, provision of supporting facilities, as well as the need for technology integration to make Islamic learning more dynamic, efficient, holistic, and meaningful. This study can be a reference for educators and education managers to improve assessment practices in learning Islamic Religion so that it can effectively achieve the goals of holistic Islamic education.

References

Abdulaal, M. A. A. D., Alenazi, M. H., Tajuddin, A. J. A., & Hamidi, B. (2022). Dynamic vs. diagnostic assessment: impacts on EFL learners’ speaking fluency and accuracy, learning anxiety, and cognitive load. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00179-0

Achmad, G. H., & Prastowo, A. (2022). Authentic Assessment Techniques on Cognitive Aspects in Islamic Religious Education Learning at Elementary School Level. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.43470

Ahmed, F. (2018). An exploration of Naquib al-Attas’ theory of Islamic education as ta’dīb as an ‘indigenous’ educational philosophy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(8), 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1247685

Al-Basheer, A., Ashraah, M., & Alsmadi, R. (2015). Arabic Language teachers and Islamic Education teachers’ awareness of authentic assessment in Jordan. Teacher Development, 19(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1064824

Alverson, J., Schwartz, J., & Shultz, S. (2019). Authentic assessment of student learning in an online class: Implications for embedded practice. College and Research Libraries, 80(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.1.32

Bangeranye, C., & Lim, Y. S. (2020). How to Use Cognitively Diagnostic Assessments of Student Performance as a Method for Monitoring and Managing the Instructional Quality in Undergraduate Medical Education. Academic Medicine, 95(1), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002954

Baroroh, U., & Hamani, T. (2022). Development of Authentic Assessment in Islamic Religious Education in Elementary School. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 940–955. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i3.2380

Bensman, S. J. (2011). Anne-Wil Harzing: The publish or perish book: Your guide to effective and responsible citation analysis. Scientometrics, 88(1), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0388-8

Chong, E. J. M., Lim, J. S. W., Liu, Y., Lau, Y. Y. L., & Wu, V. X. (2016). Improvement of learning domains of nursing students with the use of authentic assessment pedagogy in clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 20, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.002

Csapó, B., & Molnár, G. (2019). Online diagnostic assessment in support of personalized teaching and learning: The eDia system. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01522

Daud, A., Azhar, F., Isjoni, I., & Chowdhury, R. (2023). Complexities of Authentic Assessment Implementation in English Learning at Rural Areas-Based High Schools. International Journal of Language Education, 7(3), 494–510. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i3.41345

Egan, K., & Wengell, M. (2017). Creating An Authentic Assessment to Make Health Education Meaningful for All Students. Strategies, 30(1), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2017.1253376

Fadlillah, N., Bakar, M. Y. A., & Assegaf, A. R. (2023). Optimizing Human Development: The Relevance of Hasan Langgulung’s Concept of Islamic Education in the 21st Century. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.36667/jppi.v11i1.1525

Fuentes-Nieto, T., López-Pastor, V. M., & Palacios-Picos, A. (2022). A combination of transformative and authentic assessment through ICT in Physical Education. In Retos (Vol. 45, pp. 728–738). https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v44i0.91459

Gebril, A. (2016). Educational Assessment in Muslim Countries: Values, Policies, and Practices. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment (pp. 204–220). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749136-19

Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2016). Authentic assessment in seafarer education: using literature review to investigate its validity and reliability through rubrics. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15(2), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-015-0094-0

Gupta, S. L., Mittal, A., Singh, S., & Dash, D. N. (2024). Demand-driven approach of vocational education and training (VET) and experiential learning: a thematic analysis through systematic literature review (SLR). Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2023-0083

Hamdi, S., & Muslimah, M. (2022). The Dilemma of Applying Authentic Assessment to Aqidah Akhlak Subjects. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 1091–1104. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i3.2211

Hijriyah, L., Alias, A., & Mohd Sahabuddin, M. F. (2024). Exploring walkability research trends based on systematic literature review (SLR) by applying PRISMA. Open House International, 49(1), 63–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2023-0031

Ilham Fahmi, M., Wahyu, D., Aisyah, S. A., Harto, K., & Suryana, E. (2023). Implementasi Asesmen Diagnostik Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri 1 Ogan Komering Ulu. FIKROTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Manajemen Islam, 12(02), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v12i02.7239

Ismail, F. (2023). The Use of Diagnostic Test for Islamic Education Subject in the Post Covid-19 Assessment on the Affective Domain. Ta’dib: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 28(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v28i1.17150

James, L. T., & Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659

Jiang, B., Li, X., Yang, S., Kong, Y., Cheng, W., Hao, C., & Lin, Q. (2022). Data-Driven Personalized Learning Path Planning Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments in MOOCs. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083982

Jurich, D. P., & Bradshaw, L. P. (2014). An Illustration of Diagnostic Classification Modeling in Student Learning Outcomes Assessment. International Journal of Testing, 14(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2013.835728

Kahn-Horwitz, J., & Goldstein, Z. (2024). English foreign language reading and spelling diagnostic assessments informing teaching and learning of young learners. Language Testing, 41(1), 60–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231162838

Karim, A. A., Abduh, A., Manda, D., & Yunus, M. (2018). The effectivity of authentic assessment based character education evaluation model. TEM Journal, 7(3), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM73-04

Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2016). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: analysing the relative validity of the AASL (Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Learning) model. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484

Keenan, K. M., & Stewart-Wells, A. G. (2021). Moving Beyond Comprehensive Exams: Implementing Authentic Assessments to Enhance Doctoral Student Learning. Christian Higher Education, 20(1–2), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2020.1851815

Khoiriyah, S., Faizin, M., Asror, M., & Kusaeri, K. (2023). Research Trends in School Excellent Model (SEM): The Future Insights for Islamic Education Assessment. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 15(2), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i2.3143

Kristiawan, M., & Elnanda, D. (2017). The Implementation of Authentic Assessment in Cultural History of Islamic Subject. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 24(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v24i3.345

Maas, L., Brinkhuis, M. J. S., Kester, L., & Wijngaards-De Meij, L. (2022). Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment in University Statistics Education: Valid and Reliable Skill Measurement for Actionable Feedback Using Learning Dashboards. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104809

Mahmudi, I., Imani, A., Yasin Indriyanti, C., & Pooteh, R. (2024). Impact of Portfolio Authentic Assessment on Students’ Learning Outcomes of Nahwu at Modern Islamic Boarding School. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 6(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v6i3.27441

Maimori, R. (2017). the Development of Authentic Assessment Rubric on History of Islamic Culture Subject At Islamic Education Department of Iain Batusangkar. Ta’dib, 20(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v20i2.674

Markus, M., Abu Bakar, M. Y., & Kholis, N. (2023). Integration of Tringo Concept Ki Hadjar Dewantara in Development of Islamic Education Learning Evaluation. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 544. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v7i2.400

Monteiro, V., Mata, L., & Santos, N. N. (2021). Assessment Conceptions and Practices: Perspectives of Primary School Teachers and Students. Frontiers in Education, 6(April), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631185

Nyanjom, J., Goh, E., & Yang, E. C. L. (2023). Integrating authentic assessment tasks in work integrated learning hospitality internships. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 75(2), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1841821

Önder Çelikkanlı, N., & Kızılcık, H. Ş. (2022). Review of Studies About Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests in Physics Educatio. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(4), 1291–1311. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.175

Puteri, A. N., Yoenanto, N. H., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2023). Efektivitas Asesmen Autentik dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i1.3535

Rochmawati, Y., & Wahyuni, S. (2017). Authentic Assessment in Physics Learning Using Physics Chess Game for Senior High School. International Journal of Learning, 3(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLT.3.1.15-18

Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Using Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools to Explain and Enhance Experiential Learning for Authentic Assessment. Education Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010083

Sampath Kumar, V., Veerendra Kumar, A. N., Bisoyi, S. K., & Pandey, J. P. (2022). The novel evaluation scheme for Competency Based Learning, authentic assessment and its implementation strategies for universities of higher education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(special issue 2), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23032

Schlax, J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Happ, R., Pant, H. A., Jitomirski, J., Kühling-Thees, C., Förster, M., & Brückner, S. (2020). Validity and fairness of a new entry diagnostics test in higher education economics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(October 2019), 100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100900

Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., & Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70(March), 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030

Sufyadi, S., Lmabas, Rosdiana, T., Novrika, S., Isyowo, S., Hartini, Y., Primadonna, M., Rochim, N. A. F., & Rizal, M. L. (2021). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/SMK/MA). In Kepala Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknolog.

Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021). Does Diagnostic Feedback Promote Learning? Evidence From a Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211060804

Tepper, C., Bishop, J., & Forrest, K. (2020). Authentic assessment utilising innovative technology enhanced learning. Asia Pacific Scholar, 5(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2020-5-1/SC2065

Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024

Vu, T. T., & Dall’Alba, G. (2014). Authentic Assessment for Student Learning: An ontological conceptualisation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(7), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.795110

Wahyudi, L. (2020). Tentang Watase Uake. Watase Uake Indonesia. https://www.watase.web.id/home/index.php

Wancham, K., & Tangdhanakanond, K. (2023). Development of learning path map of work and energy for high schoolers by using cognitive diagnostic assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/13812

Way, K. A., Burrell, L., D’Allura, L., & Ashford-Rowe, K. (2021). Empirical investigation of authentic assessment theory: An application in online courses using mimetic simulation created in university learning management ecosystems. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1740647

Winarno, Komalasari, K., & Indrawadi, J. (2023). Authentic assessment in online learning to develop students’ character. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(4), 1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.4.13

Wright, D., & Veness, D. (2016). An Authentic Learning Approach to Assessment in Australian Archaeology. Archaeologies, 12(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-017-9301-2

Yakob, M., Sari, R. P., Hasibuan, M. P., Nahadi, N., Anwar, S., & Islami, R. A. Z. El. (2023). the Feasibility of Authentic Assessment Instrument Through Virtual Laboratory Learning and Its Effect on Increasing Students’ Scientific Performance. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.631

Zhan, P., Li, F., & Jiao, H. (2021). Editorial: Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(November), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.806636

Zulkifli, H., & Azman, N. A. (2021). Students’ Self-Assessment on Hikmah Pedagogy in Islamic Education. Religación. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(29), e210805. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v6i29.805

Downloads

Published

2024-06-22

How to Cite

Fadlillah, N., & Kusaeri, K. (2024). Optimizing Assessment for Learning in Islamic Education through Authentic and Diagnostic Assessment : A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 654–667. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i2.11555

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): June

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.