Evaluating the K-13 Versus Merdeka Curriculum : Impacts on Primary, Junior, and Senior High School Education in Indonesia

Authors

  • Endra Priawasana Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember, Indonesia
  • Singgih Subiyantoro Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.12060

Keywords:

Evaluation, K-13, Merdeka Curriculum.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impacts of the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum on primary, junior, and senior high school education in Indonesia. The 2013 Curriculum was introduced to enhance critical thinking, creativity, and character education, while the Merdeka Curriculum emphasizes greater flexibility, independence, and student-centered learning approaches. This study used a mixed-methods with a comparative analysis to assess educational outcomes, teacher and student adaptability, and overall satisfaction within these distinct curricular contexts. Data was collected via surveys, interviews, and academic performance metrics from a representative sample of schools across different regions of Indonesia. Quantitative data from surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, including t-tests and ANOVA, to compare student engagement levels and academic performance under both curricula. Qualitative data from interviews and observations were coded and analyzed thematically to capture the nuanced experiences and perceptions of teachers and students. Research findings show that the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum have their strengths and weaknesses, the latter is generally viewed more favorably by teachers and students for its emphasis on flexibility, learner autonomy, and holistic development. The Merdeka Curriculum has shown promise in fostering student engagement, critical thinking skills, and creativity, yet challenges persist in terms of implementation, teacher training, and resource allocation. A novel finding of this research is the significant improvement in holistic assessment practices under the Merdeka Curriculum, which better captures student competencies beyond standardized testing. Additionally, the study highlights the critical role of equitable resource allocation and continuous professional development for teachers in the successful implementation of curriculum reforms.

References

Ananda, R. (2021). EVALUATION OF LEARNING OUTCOME: The Comparison Between the Education Unit Level Curriculum (KTSP) and the 2013 Curriculum. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 9(2), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i2.510

Antara, P. A., Widiana, I. W., Setemen, K., Tegeh, I. M., & Adijaya, M. A. (2023). The Effect of Learner Autonomy and Institutional Support System on Agile Learners, Independence, and Work Readiness of Students Participating in the Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Program. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(15), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i15.6432

Crawford, L. K., Arellano Carmona, K., & Kumar, R. (2024). Examining the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Self-Reported and Actual Learning Outcomes. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. https://doi.org/10.1177/23733799241234065

Garbers, S., March, D., Kornfeld, J., Baumgartner, S. R., Wiggin, M., Westley, L. A., Ballesteros-Gonzalez, D., Delva, M., & Fried, L. P. (2022). Columbia University Master of Public Health Core Curriculum: Implementation, Student Experience, and Learning Outcomes, 2013-2018. Public Health Reports, 137(1), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354921999162

Hermayawati. (2020). Teachers’ efforts in understanding the factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive assessment using the revised 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.11

Junaidin, Sugiyono, Suryono, Y., & Komalasari. (2022). Teacher s achievement in curriculum 2013 training: A hierarchical linear model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 891–910. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15151a

Maskur, R., Sumarno, Rahmawati, Y., Pradana, K., Syazali, M., Septian, A., & Palupi, E. K. (2020). The effectiveness of problem based learning and aptitude treatment interaction in improving mathematical creative thinking skills on curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.375

Muflihin, M. H., & Warsito, C. (2024). Independent Learning Policy for Quality Strategic Educational Management Using IT Skills: A Case of Merdeka Campus (MBKM) Program in Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success, 25(198), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.198.37

Nasir, M., Nastiti, L. R., & Yuliani, H. (2020). Obstacle on the Implementation of the Scientific Approach to the Curriculum 2013: A Case Study of Lesson Study in Palangka Raya City. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012108

Normand, L. (2021). From blind spot to hotspot: representations of the ‘immigrant others’ in Norwegian curriculum/schoolbooks (1905-2013). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1734665

Purnomo, E., & Triwiyono, E. (2019). The 2013 Curriculum-Based Learning Evaluation at Vocational High Schools in Yogyakarta Special Region. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1273(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012028

Saragih, S., Zulkarnain, & Nisa, S. (2020). The Impact of Learning Model Based on 2013 Curriculum Towards Contextual Problem Solving Skill. Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296290

Sihombing, A. A., Anugrahsari, S., Parlina, N., & Kusumastuti, Y. S. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in an Online Learning during The Covid-19 Outbreak: Concept and Implementation. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16207

Suharno, Rifai, & Sudrajat, A. (2023). Multicultural encounters within kampus merdeka: A study on educational policy impact to bolster diversity. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(2), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i2.58223

Suyadi, Wahyu Asmorojati, A., Yudhana, A., Nuryana, Z., & Binti Siraj, S. (2022). COVID-19 ambassadors: Recognizing Kampus Mengajar at the Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka program humanitarian projects in the tertiary education curriculum. Frontiers in Education, 7(September), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.902343

Thohir, M., Ma’arif, S., Junaedi, Huda, H., & Ahmadi. (2021). From disruption to mobilization: Ire teachers’ perspectives on independent learning policy. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.39540

Umar, Ockta, Y., & Mardesia, P. (2023). A Correlational Study: Pedagogical and professional competence of physical education teachers in relation to the implementation of the Merdeka curriculum. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 23(12), 3325–3331. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2023.12380

Voak, A., Fairman, B., Helmy, A., & Afriansyah, A. (2023). Kampus Merdeka: Providing Meaningful Engagement in a Disruptive World. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(8), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i8.6076

Wardiyah, J., Budianti, Y., Farabi, M. Al, Sirojuddin, A., & Fatikh, M. A. (2023). Merdeka Belajar Activity Unit at Madrasah Aliyah: Program Evaluation Study Using CIPP Method. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v6i1.2633

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation: a Meta-Analysis. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 36, Issue 1). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

Yoto, Marsono, Suyetno, A., Mawangi, P. A. N., Romadin, A., & Paryono. (2024). The role of industry to unlock the potential of the Merdeka curriculum for vocational school. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2335820

Downloads

Published

2024-09-18

How to Cite

Priawasana, E., & Subiyantoro, S. (2024). Evaluating the K-13 Versus Merdeka Curriculum : Impacts on Primary, Junior, and Senior High School Education in Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.12060

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): September

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.