Readiness of ICE Institute Courses Based on ICE-I QAT with Quality Assurance Criteria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.12845Keywords:
Distance Learning, MOOC, Online Courses, Quality Assurance.Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the readiness of online courses offered by the ICE Institute based on seven quality assurance dimensions developed through ICE-I QAT. These seven dimensions include course information, instructor information, technology and learning tools, learning materials, interaction, assessment, and evaluation. The method used was descriptive quantitative by using instrument quality assurance criteria was developed by ICE-I. Sample of this research were 77 courses and were curated by the partner universities collaborating with the ICE Institute in 2024. The results show variability in the readiness levels of the courses across each dimension. For example, in the course information dimension, only 45 out of 77 courses met the minimum standards, while in the assessment dimension, only 23 courses met the standards. These findings indicate that many courses still need quality improvement, particularly in learning materials, interaction, and assessment. The discussion highlights the importance of providing clear information, effective use of learning technology, and comprehensive instructional materials to enhance student engagement and course completion. The study concludes that improving the quality of online courses is essential to support effective and meaningful distance learning at the ICE Institute.
References
Albelbisi, N. A., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Habibi, A. (2021). Impact of Quality Antecedents on Satisfaction Toward MOOC. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906843
Alcarria, R., Bordel, B., de Andrés, D. M., & Robles, T. (2018). Enhanced peer assessment in MOOC evaluation through assignment and review analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7461
Alhazzani, N. (2020). MOOC’s Impact on Higher Education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100030
Barman, L., McGrath, C., & Stohr, C. (2019). Higher Education; For Free, For Everyone, For Real? Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and the Responsible University: History and Enacting Rationalities for MOOC Initiatives at Three Swedish Universities. In M. P. Sørensen, L. Geschwind, J. Kekäle, & R. Pinheiro (Eds.), The Responsible University (Exploring the Nordic Context and Beyond) (1st ed., pp. 117–144).
Bozkurt, A., Akgün-özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 118–147.
Brahimi, T., & Sarirete, A. (2015). Learning outside the classroom through MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.013
Bryson, D. (2017). Can MOOCs meet your learning needs? Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 40(4), 170–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2017.1367253
Cheng, Y. M. (2022). Which Quality Determinants Cause MOOCs Continuance Intention? A Hybrid Extending the Expectation-Confirmation Model with LLearning Engagement and Information Systems Success. Library Hi Tech, 41(6), 1748–1780. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2021-0391
Cladera, M. (2021). An Application of Importance-Performance Analysis to Students’ Evaluations of Learning Domains. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/V30I01/31-42
Ferreira, C., Arias, A. R., & Vidal, J. (2022). Quality criteria in MOOC: Comparative and proposed indicators. PLoS ONE, 17(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278519
Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5 SPL.ISS.). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.643
Ginting, D., Woods, R., Tantri, N. R., Rahayu, P. S., & Asfihana, R. (2022). Portraying the Performance of Indonesian’s Massive Open Online Course Facilitators. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221116601
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12(June), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Hood, N., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). MOOC Quality: the need for new measures. Journal of Learning for Development, 3(3), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v3i3.165
Irwanto, I., Wahyudiati, D., Saputro, A. D., & Lukman, I. R. (2023). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (2012-2022). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.2.1799
Li, Y. (2019). MOOCs in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. 5th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR), 319, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.2991/ichssr-19.2019.10
Lowenthal, P. R., & Hodges, C. B. (2015). In Search of Quality: Using Quality Matters to Analyze the Quality of Massive, Open, Online Courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2348
Lu, O. H. T., Huang, J. C. H., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2017). Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an MOOCs enabled collaborative programming course. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1278391
Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., & Håklev, S. (2015). University of Toronto instructors’ experiences with developing MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2073
Newton, D. (2020). The “Depressing†And “Disheartening†News About MOOCs. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereknewton/2020/06/21/the-depressing-and-disheartening-news-about-moocs/
Purbojo, R., & Stefany, S. (2021). Distance education quality assurance toolkit: A means to transform open and distance learning culture. Education Technology in the New Normal: Now and Beyond: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Open, Distance, and E-Learning (ISODEL), 21662, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003353423-12
Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 57–69.
Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Technological Innovations in Large-Scale Teaching: Five Roots of Massive Open Online Courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117727597
Sue, A. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and completation rates: are self-directed adult learners the most successful at MOOCs? Pepperdine University.
Thomas, G., Kumar, A., Bijlani, K., & Aswathy, R. (2016). Phieval: Four-Phase Plagiarism Detection System in Private MOOC. In N. Shetty, N. Prasad, & N. Nalini (Eds.), Emerging Research in Computing, Information, Communication and Applications (pp. 511–521). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0287-8
Verstegen, D. M. L., Fonteijn, H. T. H., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., de Rijdt, C. C. E., de Grave, W. S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). An Exploration of Problemâ€Based Learning in a MOOC. The Wiley Handbook of Problemâ€Based Learning, 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch29
Wang, L., O’Reilly, U. M., & Hemberg, E. (2019). On the influence of grades on learning behavior of students in MOOCs. Learning With MOOCs 2019: “Enhancing Workforce Diversity and Inclusion,†October, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333652
Wong, B. T. ming. (2016). Factors leading to effective teaching of MOOCs. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0023
Yepes-Baldó, M., Romeo, M., MartÃn, C., GarcÃa, M. Ã., Monzó, G., & BesolÃ, A. (2016). Quality indicators: developing “MOOCs†in the European Higher Education Area. Educational Media International, 53(3), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1236998
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
