The Evolution and Trend of The Use of Digital Assessment Instruments in Project-Based Learning in Online Learning Environment

Authors

  • Eva Nauli Taib Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Syarifah Farissi Hamama Universitas Abulyatama, Indonesia
  • Nurmahni Harahap MTsN 1 Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.13668

Keywords:

Digital Assessment Instruments, Project-Based Learning, Online Learning.

Abstract

This study examined the evolution and trends in the use of digital assessment instruments in project-based learning (PBL) in an online learning environment. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to ensure transparency and rigor. The review included 44 articles published between 2019 and 2024. The data collection process involved searching using various keywords and platforms such as Scopus and Google Scholar, facilitated by Publish or Perish (PoP), as well as article selection using Rayyan AI and Claude AI to ensure suitability to the study criteria. Data were analyzed using thematic synthesis to identify key patterns and trends in the application of these digital tools. Findings indicated the need for: (1) integration of various assessment modalities for effective online learning, (2) development of pedagogical frameworks that support new technologies, and (3) standardization of digital assessment systems. In addition, the review suggests further research to assess the long-term effectiveness and impact of new technology-based instruments on learning outcomes. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of digital assessment instruments in online learning and provide evidence-based recommendations for future development.

References

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Gameil, A. A. (2021). The Effect of Digital Technology Integration on Students’ Academic Performance through Project-Based Learning in an E-learning Environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19421

Baker, E. L. (2005). Technology and Effective Assessment Systems. Teachers College Record, 107(14), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810510701414

Bearman, M., Nieminen, J. H., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing assessment in a digital world: An organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2069674

Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004

Daniar, A. V., Herdyastuti, N., & Lutfi, A. (2023). Analysis Effectiveness of Implementation Assessment as Learning on Metacognitive Skills. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.392

de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2006). How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education, 46(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.007

Dinçer, S. (2024). Bridging the gap in technology integration in education: An examination of science teachers’ competencies and needs. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.033

Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), Article 5/6.

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Avoiding the Dark Side of Digital Transformation in Teaching. An Institutional Reference Framework for eLearning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042023

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

Gasevic, D., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2016). Let’s Grow Together: Tutorials on Learning Analytics Methods. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.2

Ghani, A. B. A., Mahat, N. I., Omar, M. F., & Bakar, S. A. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Higher Education and Research: Learning from Experience and the Way Forward. Journal of Sustainability Perspectives, 1(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jsp.2021.11747

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2019). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or metaâ€analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

Harzing -, A.-W. (2016, February 6). Publish or Perish. Harzing.Com. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish

Huang, J., Matthews, K. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2022). ‘The university doesn’t care about the impact it is having on us’: Academic experiences of the institutionalisation of blended learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1557–1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1915965

Husaeni, D. F. A., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric Using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar data): From Step-by-step Processing for Users to the Practical Examples in the Analysis of Digital Learning Articles in Pre and Post Covid-19 Pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v2i1.37368

Johar, R., Maisela, A., & Suhartati, S. (2023). Students’ creative thinking skill through realistic mathematics education on straight-line equation. Jurnal Elemen, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.7697

Kimmons, R. (2020). Current Trends (and Missing Links) in Educational Technology Research and Practice. TechTrends, 64(6), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00549-6

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177.

Mejías-Acosta, A., D’Armas Regnault, M., Vargas-Cano, E., Cárdenas-Cobo, J., & Vidal-Silva, C. (2024). Assessment of digital competencies in higher education students: Development and validation of a measurement scale. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1497376

Moncho Mas, V., Marco-Simó, J. M., & Cobarsí-Morales, J. (2021, January 29). EHR Implementation: A Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68418-1_1

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Rosa, A. L. la, Sánchez-Serrano, J. L. S., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2021). Assessment in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(19), 1–13.

Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing Assessment—Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12018

Richardson, J., Brush, T., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Karlin, M., Leary, H., Shelton, B., Lowell, V., Exter, M., Strycker, J., & Shin, S. (2020). Innovations in Instructional Design and Technology Programs: A View from PIDT 2018. TechTrends. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/edtech_facpubs/312

Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557496

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Tonelli, D., Grion, V., & Serbati, A. (2018). L’EFFICACE INTERAZIONE FRA VALUTAZIONE E TECNOLOGIE: EVIDENZE DA UNA RASSEGNA SISTEMATICA DELLA LETTERATURA. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1028

Wang, T. h. (2007). What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00211.x

Zhang, X. (2022). Demystifying the challenges of university students’ web-based learning: A qualitative case study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10161–10178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10974-0

Downloads

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

Taib, E. N., Hamama, S. F., & Harahap, N. (2025). The Evolution and Trend of The Use of Digital Assessment Instruments in Project-Based Learning in Online Learning Environment. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.13668

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): March

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.