Hypothetical Learning Trajectory for Prospective Elementary School Teachers in Learning Mathematics Assisted Artificial Intelligence Based on STEM

Authors

  • Arvin Efriani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia
  • Sujinal Arifin Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.14469

Keywords:

Hypothetical Learning Trajectory, Artificial Intelligence, STEM.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the process of designing Hypothetical Learning Trajectory of STEM Learning assisted by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for prospective teachers and its application in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Mathematics courses. This research method used a design research (DR) with a qualitative approach. The subjects of this study were Prospective elementary school teachers Madrasah Ibtidaiyah students totaling 102 people from 25 groups. This study was divided into three stages, namely preparation of the experiment (design), implementation of the learning experiment, and retrospective analysis. The data collection techniques used in this study were observation, interviews, and questionnaires. Then the data was analyzed qualitatively with the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The product of this study was an estimate of the STEM learning trajectory assisted by Artificial Intelligence (AI) which contained the following activities: exploring information, finding learning concepts, initiating ideas, and developing ideas. These four activities were carried out in a two-cycle experimental activity. After the activities were carried out, the prospective teacher students showed that they could design activities according to the stages given. There were 8 activity designs at the pilot experiment stage and 17 activity designs at the teaching experiment stage. The results of the activity design should be tested to suit the students' abilities.

References

Agustiani, R., & Nursalim, R. (2020). Hypothetical learning trajectory (HLT) for proof logic topics on algebra course: What’re the experts think about? Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i1.6204

Ahmad, S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Arianil, Y., & Zainil, M. (2018). The instruments of higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1).

Ayala-pazmi, M. F., & Hisp, E. (2023). Inteligencia artificial en la educación: Explorando los beneficios y riesgos potenciales Artificial Intelligence in Education: Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks. 3, 892–899.

Capraro, R. M. (2013). Stem project-based learning. SENSE PUBLISHERS.

Chakravartty, A. (2023). Scientific Knowledge vs. Knowledge of Science: Public Understanding and Science in Society. Science and Education, 32(6), 1795–1812.

Chen, X. (2009). Students Who Study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Postsecondary Education. Stats in Brief. NCES 2009-161. National Center for Education Statistics.

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two Decades of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Contributors, Collaborations, Research Topics, Challenges, and Future Directions. Educational Technology and Society, 25(1), 28–47.

Chen, Y., Wing, W., So, M., Zhu, J., Wing, S., & Chiu, K. (2024). STEM learning opportunities and career aspirations : the interactive effect of students ’ self ‑ concept and perceptions of STEM professionals. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–21.

Copur-Gencturk, Y., Plowman, D., & Bai, H. (2019). Mathematics Teachers’ Learning: Identifying Key Learning Opportunities Linked to Teachers’ Knowledge Growth. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1590–1628.

Efriani, A., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Aisyah, N. (2023). Developing a learning environment based on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics for pre-service teachers of early childhood teacher education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 647–662.

Gravemeijer, K. (2015). Design research on local instruction theories in mathematics education. Development of Mathematics Teaching: Design, Scale, Effects. Proceedings of MADIF9, 1–3.

Gravemeijer, K. (2016). Design-research-based curriculum innovation design research como modo de inovação curricular. Quadrante, 15(2), 7–23.

Hanan, F., & Agoestanto, A. (2022). Development of STEM-Based Learning Tools to Increase Students ’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability through Inquiry Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6927(1), 21–30.

Herfeld, C., & Lisciandra, C. (2019). Knowledge transfer and its contexts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 77, 1–10.

Heryuriani, B. (2020). Pembelajaran Materi Aritmetika Sosial Dengan Pendekatan STEM. INOMATIKA, 2(2), 147–160.

Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001

Jakobsen, A., Kazima, M., & Kasoka, D. N. (2016). Assessing prospective teachers ’ development of MKT through their teacher education : a Malawian case. 1995.

Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301.

KAZU, İ. Y., & YALÇIN, C. K. (2021). The Effect of Stem Education on Academic Performance : A Meta-Analysis Study. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 101–116.

Kenedi, A. K. (2018). Desain Instrument Higher Order Thingking Pada Mata Kuliah Dasar-Dasar Matematika Di Jurusan PGSD. AR-RIAYAH : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 67.

Khuyen, N. T. T., Bien, N. Van, Chang, Y.-H., Lin, P.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (2024). Exploring teachers’ epistemological framing through classroom discourse in 6E-STEM classes: From perception to practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2501. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15023

Lang, C., Bae, S., Battista, C., Qin, S., Chen, T., Evans, T., & Menon, V. (2018). Positive Attitude Toward Math Supports Early Academic Success: Behavioral Evidence and Neurocognitive Mechanisms. Psychological Science, 29, 095679761773552.

Lin, C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Lu, O. H. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education : a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments.

Lukman, Agustina, R., & Rihadatul Aisy. (2023). Problematika Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence (Ai) Untuk Pembelajaran Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Stit Pemalang. Jurnal Madaniyah, 13(2), 242–255.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Rosdakarya.

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Design research (Teori dan implementasinya: Suatu pengantar). Rajawali Pers.

Prahmana, R. C. I., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2016). The hypothetical learning trajectory on research in mathematics education using research-based learning. Pedagogika, 123(3), 42–54.

Putri, V. A., Andjani, K. C., & Rafael, R. A. (2023). Peran Artificial Intelligence dalam Proses Pembelajaran Mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Seminar Nasional Universitas Negeri Surabaya 2023 |, 615–630.

Sastradika, D., & Defrianti, D. (2020). Development of creative thinking skills through STEM-based instruction in senior high school student Development of creative thinking skills through STEM-based instruction in senior high school student. 6th International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICMSE 2019).

Stohlmann, M. S. (2020). Integrated STEM education through game-based learning. Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.:234429599

Superfine, A. C., Prasad, P. V., Welder, R. M., Olanoff, D., & Eubanks-Turner, C. (2020). Exploring mathematical knowledge for teaching teachers: Supporting prospective elementary teachers’ relearning of mathematics. Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2–3), 367–402.

Susanti, E., & Kurniawan, H. (2020). Design Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pendekatan STEM. Jurnal Aksioma, 11(1), 37–52.

Triplett, W. J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in STEM Education. Cybersecurity and Innovative Technology Journal, 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.53889/citj.v1i1.296

Wan, Z. H., English, L., So, W. W. M., & Skilling, K. (2023). STEM Integration in Primary Schools: Theory, Implementation and Impact. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10401-x

Wickstrom, M. H., Baek, J., Barrett, J. E., Cullen, C. J., & Tobias, J. M. (2022). Developing spatial measurement conceptions: A learning trajectory approach in the context of 3D printing. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 24(1), 47–69.

Yildirim, B. (2021). Preschool STEM Activities: Preschool Teachers’ Preparation and Views. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01056-2

Yilmaz, R. (2020). Prospective Mathematics Teachers ’ Cognitive. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 17–44.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

Efriani, A., & Arifin, S. (2025). Hypothetical Learning Trajectory for Prospective Elementary School Teachers in Learning Mathematics Assisted Artificial Intelligence Based on STEM. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.14469

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): March

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.