Strategic Roles of Teachers in Promoting Interfaith Education for Unity in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i2.15018Keywords:
Spiritual Engagement, Pro-Social Engagement, Interfaith Cooperation, Social Integration.Abstract
This study aims to explore the strategic role of teachers in building character education through a multireligious approach in Central Kalimantan. Using a mixed-method approach with a sequential explanatory design, the study combined quantitative analysis of the structural relationships between spiritual engagement, pro-social engagement, interfaith cooperation, and social integration with thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with teachers from five religious traditions (Muslim, Catholicism, Protestantism, Buddhism, and Hinduism). Quantitative data analysis used structural equation modelling with a partial least squares approach and qualitative data used thematic analysis with NVivo 14 software. The results revealed that spiritual engagement has a significant effect on interfaith cooperation and an indirect effect on social integration. In contrast, pro-social engagement has a significant effect on both interreligious cooperation and social integration. Thematic findings showed the convergence of teachers' practices in integrating universal spiritual values, facilitating interfaith pro-social activities, developing interfaith dialogue, and creating an inclusive learning environment that supports students' character-building. Expert validation confirmed the successful implementation of interpretive and integrative approaches in transforming religious education from an exclusive to an inclusive, transformative model.
References
Amat, S., Awang, M. M., & Ahmad, M. (2023). Exploring Teachers’ Perspectives on Using a Spiritual Approach to Address Bullying Behavior Among Students: A Qualitative Study. In Business Management and academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/ download/107616766/16545.pdf
Azad, M. J., & Pritchard, B. (2023). Bonding, bridging, linking social capital as mutually reinforcing elements in adaptive capacity development to flood hazard: Insights from rural Bangladesh. Climate Risk Management, 40(March), 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100498
Caviglia, F., Dalsgaard, C., Delfino, M., & Pedersen, A. Y. (2017). Dialogic literacy: Contexts, competencies and dispositions. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 17(November), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2017.17.01.05
Chandra, R. I. (2023). Future Religious Education, The Case of Indonesia: A Preliminary Study. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 4(5), 680–688. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20234515
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2eV4AgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT313&dq=the+partial+least+squares+approach+to+structural+equation+modeling&ots=t1Wf86-ZxR&sig=HkHKYpc2ONTzROxQk61gLnk9CXw
Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, January 1998, 295–336. http://books.google.com.sg/books?hl=en&lr=&id=EDZ5AgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA295&dq=chin+1998+PLS&ots=47qB7ro0np&sig=rihQBibvT6S-Lsj1H9txe9dX6Zk#v=onepage&q&f=false
Claridge, T. (2018). Functions of social capital: bonding, bridging, linking. Social Capital Research, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7993853
Cook, K. S., & Rice, E. (2006). Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbook of Social Psychology, January 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-x
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Praise for the Third Edition.
Dawadi, S. (2020). Thematic Analysis Approach: A Step-by-Step Guide for ELT Research Practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1–2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
Drajati, N. A., Trinugraha, Y. H., Sukmawati, F., RAKERDA, H., & Ilmi, M. (2023). Research Ethics in Social Studies: Indonesian Perspectives. Jurnal Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Pendidikan, 4(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.33369/jurnalinovasi.v4i1.30575
Fassott, G., Henseler, J., & Coelho, P. S. (2016). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models with composite variables. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(9), 1887–1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2016-0248
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.).
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hendricks, L. V., Edwards, W., Tietjen-Smith, T., & Reysen, S. (2022). College Students’ Awareness and Familiarity with Modern Activism: Prosocial Involvement in Black Lives Matter. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(4), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1924914
Ives, C. D., & Kidwell, J. (2019). Religion and social values for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00657-0
Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo, 3rd Edition. In SAGE Publications.
Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. International Scholarly Research Notices. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730
Löhr, K., Aruqaj, B., Baumert, D., Bonatti, M., Brüntrup, M., Bunn, C., Castro-Nunez, A., Chavez-Miguel, G., Rio, M. L. Del, Hachmann, S., Muñoz, H. C. M., Ollendorf, F., Rodriguez, T., Rudloff, B., Schorling, J., Schuffenhauer, A., Schulte, I., Sieber, S., Tadesse, S., Weinhardt, M. (2021). Social cohesion as the missing link between natural resource management and peacebuilding: Lessons from cocoa production in côte d’Ivoire and Colombia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313002
Manahung, M. R., Solong, N. P., Datunsolang, R., Hasiru, R., & Tilome, A. A. (2022). The Strategy of Interfaith Education Figures in Managing Religious Tolerance in Banuroja Village, Gorontalo. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(2), 1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v2i2.329
Mulya, T. W., Aditomo, A., & ... (2022). On being a religiously tolerant Muslim: discursive contestations among pre-service teachers in contemporary Indonesia. British Journal of Religious. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2021.1917338
Nalig, D. A., Sahid, S. R. G., Hurtada, J. F., Donaire, R. M., & Camsa, D. I. F. (2025). Unpacking Social Identity in Schools : Shaping Attitudes, Behaviors, and Equity in Inclusive Education Environments. International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), 12(12), 6–22.
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, N. P., & Doan, H. V. (2019). (2019). Pro-social engagement and social integration among ethnic minority youth in Vietnam. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 24(3), 327-340.
Qadir, A., & Saeed, A. (2020). Harmony in diversity: Interfaith engagement in contemporary Asia. Taylor & Francis.
Ruiter, S., & Tubergen, F. (2009). Religious Attendance in Cross‐ National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of 60 Countries. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 863–895. https://doi.org/10.1086/603536
Schwinn, T. (2022). Social Integration – Levels and Dimensions. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 75, 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-023-00889-0
Shaver, J. H., Lang, M., Krátký, J., Klocová, E. K., Kundt, R., & Xygalatas, D. (2018). The Boundaries of Trust: Cross-Religious and Cross-Ethnic Field Experiments in Mauritius. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918817644
Taimur, S., & Mursaleen, H. (2020). Youth volunteerism, as non-formal education, for the professional and social integration of the young labor force in Pakistan. In Asian Social Science. epe.bac-lac.gc.ca. https://epe.bac-lac.gc.ca/100/201/300/asian_social_ science/2020/ASS-V16N8-All.pdf#page=120
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.