Developing Scientific Writing Skills Instrument Using An Inquiry-Based Approach to Local Wisdom Dilemma Stories for Senior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i2.15677Keywords:
Instrument, Inquiry, Scientific Writing Skills, Local Wisdom, Dilemmas Stories.Abstract
This study aims to develop a valid and reliable instrument for assessing scientific writing skills using an inquiry-based approach to local wisdom dilemma stories. A Design and Development method, based on the Ellis & Levy model, was adopted. The method consisted of six steps: (a) issues; (b) goal setting; (c) model design and development; (d) model testing; (e) model evaluation of the test findings; and (f) application model. Two hundred seventy-three high school students from three Indonesian schools were recruited as the pilot sample. Purposive sampling was used to select the participants. Five experts evaluated the instrument's validity. The Aiken formula for content validity proof yielded a respectable score of 0.86. According to the measurement model reliability evaluation, the instrument is in the dependable category, which comprises Composite Reliability with a value of 0.89. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation value to be 0.043 < 0.08 and the Goodness of Fit Index to be 0.98 > 0, 90 or the declared model by the data obtained in the field and can be used in a wide range of measurements. The findings of this study have important implications for educational assessment and instructional design. Developing a valid and reliable instrument to measure scientific writing skills through an inquiry-based approach using local wisdom dilemma stories provides educators with a culturally relevant and pedagogically sound tool. This instrument can support more accurate evaluations of students' writing competencies and foster critical thinking and contextual understanding in scientific writing instruction at the high school level.
References
Adhikari, J., Scogings, C., Mathrani, A., & Sofat, I. (2017). Evolving digital divides in information literacy and learning outcomes: A BYOD journey in a secondary school. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(4), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2017-0022
Ahmed, S. (2017). Authentic ELT Materials in the Language Classroom : An Overview. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 181–202.
Ali, H. F., & Ulker, V. (2020). The effect of inquiry-based approach on development of reading and writing skills of a University EFL students. Asian EFL Journal, 27(2), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3621259
Amelia, R. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2017). Implementation of Item Response Theory for Analysis of Test Items Quality and Students’ Ability in Chemistry. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v2i1.8512
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355.
Astawa, I. N., Mantra, I. B. N., & Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2017). Developing communicative English language tests for tourism vocational high school students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.43
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An Instrument for Assessing Scientists’ Written Skills in Public Communication of Science. Science Communication, 35(1), 56–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012440634
Boot, P., Zijlstra, H., & Geenen, R. (2017). The Dutch translation of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 2007 dictionary. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.6.1.04boo
Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2017). The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) Model: Basic Assumptions and Preliminary Evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
Buxton, C., Harman, R., Cardozo-Gaibisso, L., Jiang, L., Bui, K., & Allexsaht-Snider, M. (2019). Understanding Science and Language Connections: New Approaches to Assessment with Bilingual Learners. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9846-8
Cantos, A. E., Alday, M. G., Alog, K. J., Asi, K. J., Calacal, R. H., & Britiller, M. C. (2015). Changing learning needs of student nurses: input to the nursing curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 108–119.
Cetin, P. S., & Eymur, G. (2017). Developing Students’ Scientific Writing and Presentation Skills through Argument Driven Inquiry: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00915
Connell, J., Carlton, J., Grundy, A., Taylor Buck, E., Keetharuth, A. D., Ricketts, T., Barkham, M., Robotham, D., Rose, D., & Brazier, J. (2018). The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL). Quality of Life Research, 27(7), 1893–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y
Elwy, A. R., Wasan, A. D., Gillman, A. G., Johnston, K. L., Dodds, N., McFarland, C., & Greco, C. M. (2020). Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation efforts: description and an example. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112532.
Erenler, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2019). Utilizing argument-driven-inquiry to develop pre-service teachers’ metacognitive awareness and writing skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 628–638.
Fu, Q. K., Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course. Computers and Education, 137(April), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005
Garza, E., & ArreguÃn-Anderson, M. G. (2018). Translanguaging: Developing scientific inquiry in a dual language classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 41(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2018.1451790
Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., & Khan, A. (2015). The effects of scientific representations on primary students’ development of scientific discourse and conceptual understandings during cooperative contemporary inquiry-science. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.988681
Hamsina, S. (2020). Increasing Students’ Motivation on Learning Writing Skills Through Inquiry Approach. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 6(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.24252/eternal.v61.2020.a3
Herring, S. C. (2005). Computerâ€mediated discourse. The handbook of discourse analysis, 612-634.
Högberg, J., Hamari, J., & Wästlund, E. (2019). Gameful Experience Questionnaire (GAMEFULQUEST): an instrument for measuring the perceived gamefulness of system use. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 29(3), 619–660.
Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B. K., Munasir, Supardi, Z. A. I., Wicaksono, I., Erlina, N., Pandiangan, P., Althaf, R., & Zainuddin. (2018). The comparison of oripa teaching model and problem based learning model effectiveness to improve critical thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.300
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user’s reference guide. Scientific Software. Inc., Mooresville, IN.
Kartowagiran, B., Suyanta, Hamdi, S., Jaedun, A., Ahman, Rusijono, & Laliyo, L. A. R. (2020). Development of web-based application for teacher candidate competence instruments: Preparing professional teachers in the IR 4.0 era. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1749–1763. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1749
Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The Psychology of Writing. Oxford University Press.
Khosronejad, M., Reimann, P., & Markauskaite, L. (2021). ‘We are not going to educate people’: how students negotiate engineering identities during collaborative problem solving. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(4), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1821174
Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: A rose by another name.
Kriswantoro, Kartowagiran, B., & Rohaeti, E. (2021). A critical thinking assessment model integrated with science process skills on chemistry for senior high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.285
Lin, X., Yang, W., Wu, L., Zhu, L., Wu, D., & Li, H. (2021). Using an Inquiry-Based Science and Engineering Program to Promote Science Knowledge, Problem-Solving Skills and Approaches to Learning in Preschool Children. Early Education and Development, 32(5), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1795333
Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12009
Made, N., Mertasari, S., & Yudana, I. M. (2022). Formative Evaluation Instruments of Integrated Character Education in Thematic Learning. 6(2), 289–296.
Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Understanding Physics Concepts and Critical Thinking Skill of Vocational High School Students. International Education Studies, 13(6), 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p117
MartÃnez, R. A., & MejÃa, A. F. (2020). Looking closely and listening carefully: A sociocultural approach to understanding the complexity of Latina/o/x students’ everyday language. Theory into Practice, 59(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665414
Moyano-Fuentes, J., Bruque-Cámara, S., & Maqueira-MarÃn, J. M. (2019). Development and validation of a lean supply chain management measurement instrument. Production Planning & Control, 30(1), 20–32.
Mulyono, Y., Suranto, Yamtinah, S., & Sarwanto. (2023). Development of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Instruments Based on Environmental Socio-Scientific Issues. 16(3), 691–710.
Oviyanti, F. (2017). Urgensi Kecerdasan Interpersonal Bagi Guru. Tadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.19109/tadrib.v3i1.1384
Palupi, B. S., Subiyantoro, S., Rukayah, & Triyanto. (2020). The effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning (GIL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) for explanatory writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13146a
Scott-Weich, B., & Yaden, D. B. (2017). Scaffolded writing and early literacy development with children who are deaf: a case study. Early Child Development and Care, 187(3–4), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1246446
Smith, P., Karkar, T., Varner, J., Nigam, A., & Finch, B. (2020). Making Visible Awareness in Practice: Literacy Educators in Diverse Classrooms. Review of Education, 8(2), 380–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3190
Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Ellen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2014). Handbook of research on educational and technology. Springer.
Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., Buck Bracey, Z. E., & Donovan, B. M. (2020). Investigating Conflation of Sex and Gender Language in Student Writing About Genetics. Science and Education, 29(6), 1567–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00177-9
Stupple, E. J. N., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. Y. F., & Aubeeluck, A. V. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007
Supriyadi, S. (2021). Evaluation instrument development for scientific writing instruction with a constructivism approach. Technium Soc. Sci. J, 21(345).
Sürücü, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726.
Susilowati, W. (2020). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Model Inquiry Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Berfikir Kritis Pada. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(1), 1–6.
van Groen, M. M., & Eggen, T. J. H. . (2020). Educational test approaches: The suitability of computer-based test types for assessment and evaluation in formative and summative contexts. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 21(1), 12–24.
Verawati, N. N. S. P., Hikmawati, & Prayogi, S. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry learning models intervened by reflective processes to promote critical thinking ability in terms of cognitive style. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14687
Wallwork, A. (2016). English for writing research papers. Springer.
Weideman, A., Du Plessis, C., & Steyn, S. (2017). Diversity, variation and fairness: Equivalence in national level language assessments. Literator, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v38i1.1319
Widana, I. W. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
