Analisis Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Siswa dalam Pelaksanaan Ujian di Sekolah

Authors

  • Zayyinul Mushthofa Pendidikan Fisika S2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Ani Rusilowati Pendidikan Fisika S2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Sulhadi Sulhadi Pendidikan Fisika S2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Putut Marwoto Pendidikan Fisika S2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Budi Naini Mindiyarto Pendidikan Fisika S2, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3302

Keywords:

Academic Cheating, School, Exams.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the popular types of academic dishonesty, teachers' supervision, and the factors which motivate students to cheat. This research used the descriptive quantitative method with 260 students as respondents from 4 schools. Questionnaires were given online to the students. The data analysis technique used statistic descriptive. The result showed that the popular types of academic dishonesty among the students were asking their friends, carrying small notes, searching the answer on the web via cell phones, carrying textbooks, and etcetera. The teachers’ or supervisors’ supervision was good, but there were times when they were careless so that the students used the opportunity to cheat. During online examination supervision, the students stated that there was no particular supervision; therefore they took the advantage of this opportunity. The driving factors which caused the students to cheat were they considered the questions were too difficult; they did not have confidence in their own answers or abilities; they did not study; they had an opportunity to cheat; they wanted good grades, and they had some unanswered questions but the time was almost over.

References

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2017). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory . Understanding the Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory . Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(October 2015), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-3/1823

Artani, K. T. B., & Wetra, I. W. (2017). Pengaruh Academic Self Efficacy Dan Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi Di Bali. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 7(2), 123–132. http://jurnal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/JUARA/article

Aulia, F. (2015). Faktor-Faktor yang Terkait dengan Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal RAP UNP, 6(1), 23–32. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/6647

Clariana, M., Gotzens, C., del Mar, M., & Cladellas, R. (2012). Procrastination and cheating from secondary school to university/Procrastinacion y engaño académico desde la secundaria hasta la universidad. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(2), 737+. http://tp5jv5du8m.search.serialssolutions.com.etechconricyt.idm.oclc.org/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=

Day, N. E., Hudson, D., Dobies, P. R., & Waris, R. (2011). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9145-8

Fransiska, I. S., & Utami, H. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 6(2), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v6i22019p316

Galloway, M. K. (2012). Cheating in Advantaged High Schools: Prevalence, Justifications, and Possibilities for Change. Ethics and Behavior, 22(5), 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.679143

Högberg, R. (2011). Cheating as subversive and strategic resistance: Vocational students’ resistance and conformity towards academic subjects in a Swedish upper secondary school. Ethnography and Education, 6(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2011.610584

Ip, E. J., Nguyen, K., Shah, B. M., Doroudgar, S., & Bidwal, M. K. (2016). Motivations and predictors of cheating in pharmacy school. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(8). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe808133

Khodaie, E., Moghadamzadeh, A., & Salehi, K. (2011). Factors affecting the probability of academic cheating school students in Tehran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.401

Nursalam, N., Bani, S., & Munirah, M. (2016). Bentuk Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Cheating) Mahasiswa Pgmi Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan Uin Alauddin Makassar. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 16(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2013v16n2a1

Pramadi, A., Pali, M., Hanurawan, F., & Atmoko, A. (2017). Academic Cheating in School: A Process of Dissonance Between Knowledge and Conduct. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(6), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/mjss-2017-0052

Purnamasari, D. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal, 2(1), 13–21. file:///D:/My Documents/Downloads/2581-Article Text-5082-1-10-20131203.pdf

Ramberg, J., & Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students’ grades and moral standards matter for this relationship? Social Psychology of Education, 22(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09486-6

Sagoro, E. M. (2013). Pensinergian Mahasiswa, Dosen, Dan Lembaga Dalam Pencegahan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 11(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v11i2.1691

Suryani, L., Seto, S., & Bantas, M. (2020). Hubungan Efikasi Diri dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Berbasis E-Learning pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Flores. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 275-283. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i2.2609

Downloads

Published

2021-06-07

How to Cite

Mushthofa, Z., Rusilowati, A., Sulhadi, S., Marwoto, P., & Mindiyarto, B. N. (2021). Analisis Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Siswa dalam Pelaksanaan Ujian di Sekolah. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 446–452. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3302

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): June

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.