Flipped Learning Instruction to Enhance University Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills

Authors

  • Suprapti Suprapti Department of Elementary Teacher Education, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Arif Nugroho Department of Accounting, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Heldy Ramadan Putra Pembangunan Department of Education Management, UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3320

Keywords:

Flipped Learning, Higher Order Skills, Twenty-First Teaching Method.

Abstract

This study aims to shed some light on the significant impact of content videos in flipped learning classroom on students’ higher order thinking skills. The secondary aim of this study is to portray students’ perception toward the practice of flipped learning in assisting their higher order thinking skill development. A total of 36 elementary teacher education students at IAIN Surakarta are involved as participants in this pre-experimental study. Drawing on pre-test, post-test, and focus group discussion, the results of paired sample t-test show a significant difference on the students’ score of pre-test and post-test, meaning that flipped learning with content videos is effective to enhance the students’ higher order thinking skills. Furthermore, the focus group discussion reveals that the students positively perceive the practice of flipped learning instruction to enhance their higher order thinking skills. These results contribute to providing fruitful insights for teachers and school administrators as a teaching model to enhance students’ higher order thinking skills.

References

Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108–121.

Annan, D. K., Onodipe, D. G., & Stephenson, D. A. (2019). Using Student-Created Content Videos in Flipped Learning to Enhance Student Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Engagement, and Satisfaction. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 6(3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n3p4

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27.

Chun, B. (2014). A case study of flipped learning at college: focused on effects of motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 467–492.

Hasanudin, C., & Fitrianingsih, A. (2018). Flipped Classroom Using Screencast-O-Matic Apps in Teaching Reading Skill in Indonesian Language. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 16–151.

Hembrough, T., & Jordan, J. (2020). Creating a digital writing classroom: A mixed methods study about a first-year composition tablet initiative. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13239a

Heo, H. J., & Chun, B. A. (2018). Improving the higher order thinking skills using flipped learning: Focused on the in-class activities with problem posing and solving. Asia Life Sciences, 15(4), 2187–2200.

Hwang, G. J., Yin, C., & Chu, H. C. (2019). The era of flipped learning: promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1667150

Katchamat, P. (2018). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Instruction on Appropriacy of English Apology by Thai EFL Learners. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2, 13–119.

Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831.

Lee, G., & Wallace, A. (2018). Flipped Learning in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom: Outcomes and Perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.372

Lee, K. yuen, & Lai, Y. chi. (2017). Facilitating higher-order thinking with the flipped classroom model: a student teacher’s experience in a Hong Kong secondary school. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0048-6

Margana, M., & Widyantoro, A. (2017). Developing English Textbooks Oriented to Higher Order Thinking Skills for Students of Vocational High Schools in Yogyakarta. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.04

Mutiaraningrum, I., & Cahyono, B.Y. (2015). Online Debate in Argumentative Writing Course : Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(4), 43–54.

Mutiaraningrum, I., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Social construction of knowledge in synchronous text-based discussion during English language learning. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 10(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.1934

Nartiningrum, N. & Nugroho, A. (2020). Online Learning amidst Global Pandemic : EFL Students ’ Challenges , Suggestions , and Needed Materials. English Franca: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 4(2), 115–140.

Nugroho, A. & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2020). EFL teachers ’ beliefs and practices about digital learning of English. Edulite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 5(2), 304–321. https://doi.org/ 10.30659/e.5.2.287-303

Nugroho, A. (2020). English Material Needs of Accounting Students : An English for Specific Purposes Approach. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1239

Nugroho, A., & Atmojo, A. E. P. (2020). Digital learning of English beyond classroom: EFL learners’perception and teaching activities. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 7(2), 219–243.

Phakiti, A. (2015). Experimental research methods in language learning. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84.

Satar, H. M. (2018). Pre-service EFL teachers ’ online participation , interaction , and social presence. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 157–183.

Singay. (2020). Flipped learning in English as a second language classroom: Bhutanese students’ perceptions and attitudes of flipped learning approach in learning grammar. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 666–674. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23217

Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2020). Impacts of flipped classrooms on learner attitudes towards technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 240–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557692

Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications.

Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916

Downloads

Published

2021-06-07

How to Cite

Suprapti, S., Nugroho, A., & Pembangunan, H. R. P. (2021). Flipped Learning Instruction to Enhance University Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3320

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): June

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.