Menganalisis Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika pada Materi Segi Empat Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Dompu

Authors

  • Baharudin Baharudin Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, PPs Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v1i1.388

Keywords:

Instruments, Assessment, Mathematics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the usefulness of the instruments of assessment in learning mathematics material covered, any Barriers faced by teachers of mathematics in assessment Instruments and devised alternative solutions to consider in drawing up the instrument for the assessment of attitudes, knowledge and skills. The research approach used in this research is descriptive research is qualitative exploration. The results showed that the teacher makes an instrument of systematic assessment and runtun if seen on the plan of implementation of the learning on the syllabus, the RPP and the Synod of the teacher. But on the other hand that the results of this study explained that teacher assessment tests are instruments devised only to the alleviation of material being taught, then reserved only focused on numbers, not many questions are structured to stimulate the mindset of students where students are required to familiarise problem-solving, so the thinking skills of students both at a high level, critical, creative, and solving the problem is not to obtrusive, only play on numbers alone.

References

Depdiknas. (2007). Panduan Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu. Jakarta: Puskur, Balitbang Depdiknas.

Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Havnes, A and McDowell, L. (2008). Balancing Dilemmas in Assessment and Learning in Contemporary Education. New York: Master e Book.

Kunandar. 2013. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Masriyah. (2010). Implementasi KTSP pada Assesmen Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Wahana. Volume 54. Nomor 1

Moleong, Lexy J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM

OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 Results In Focus What 15 Year Olds Know And What They Can Do With What They Know. Italy: OECD.

Popham, W.J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. USA: ASCD.

Santoso Budi. (2007). Penilaian Fortofolio Dalam Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Volume 1 Nomor 2.

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suwandi, Sarwiji. (2010). Model Assesmen Dalam Pembelajaran. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Vera Gouveia & Jorge Valadares. 2004. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proc. of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping A. J. Cañas, J. D. Novak, F. M. González, Eds. Pamplona, Spain.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen. (1996). Assessmen and Realistic Mathematics Education.

--------------------------------------- (2001). Towards a didactic-based model for assessment design in mathematics education. Proceedings of 2001 The Netherlands and Taiwan Conference on Mathematics Education, Taipei, Taiwan, 19 – 23 November 2001.

Wardhani, S. (2004). Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Kompetensi. Modul Pelatihan. Diklat Instruktur/ Pengembang Matematika SMK di PPPG Matematika Yogyakarta. Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Pusat Pengembangan Penataran Guru (PPPG) Matematika

Downloads

Published

2015-02-26

How to Cite

Baharudin, B. (2015). Menganalisis Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika pada Materi Segi Empat Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Dompu. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v1i1.388

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1: Maret 2015

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.