Mengidentifikasi Faktor Penghambat Guru Matematika Kecamatan Dompu NTB Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran pada Sekolah Menengah Atas

Authors

  • Muh Fitrah Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, PPs Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v1i1.401

Keywords:

kunci, faktor penghambat, guru, pembelajaran matematika.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify an inhibiting factor of teachers and to seek a solution in mathematics learning process at senior high school in Dompu NTB. This is a qualitative-descriptive research. The subject of this research is five mathematics teachers who spread out at five high schools. Research data is gained by a means of: 1) a field note; 2) interview; 3) questionnaire, & 4) document. Datum analysis technique uses descriptive qualitative. The result of this research shows that the inhibiting factor of the teacher s in mathematics learning process: 1) students, low basic knowledge on mathematics concept they have, specially lack of mastering a basic subject; 2) teachers, the teachers only tend to teach the basic matter on mathematics concept; 3) learning process , teachers’ low motivation in combining and implementing various models of learning approach which make the students miss mathematics; 4) a learning evaluation, lack of teacher’s skill and knowledge in designing the learning evaluation instrument, and 5) a learning means and instrument, no proper media of mathematics learning at schools, no creativity, no innovation, and no teaching art of teachers in arranging the learning media.

References

Adamura Fatriya. 2015. Kemampuan Mahasiswa Dalam Melaksanakan Kompetensi Guru Profesional Pada Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Masalah Materi Geometri Non Euclides. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika ISBN No. 978-979-028-728-0. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Alimuddin. 2009. Menumbuh Kembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa melalui Tugas-Tugas Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Penelitian dan Penerapan MIPA, Fakultas MIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Ariyadi Wijaya. 2012. Pendidikan Matematika Realistik: Suatu Altrnatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Arends, R. I. 2004. Learning To Teach (6th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Booker,George. 2005. Thinking Mathematically-Making Sense and Solving Problems, The Mathematics Education into the 21th Century Project Universiti Teknologi Malayasia, Reform, Revolution and Paradigm Shift in Mathematics Education, Johor Bahru, Malaysia, Nov 25th- Des 1th

Barnes, H. 1989. Structuring Knowledge for The Beginning Teachers. In Reynolds, M. C. (Ed.). Knowledge Base for The Beginning Teacher, 13-22. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Bell, B., & Cowie, B. 2000. The Characteristics of Formative Assessment in Science Education. Science Education, 85, 536–553.

Dalyono, M. 2005. Psikologi Pendidikan: Komponen MKDK. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Depdiknas. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Dunkin, M.J. 1987. The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education. England: Pengmoon Press.

Earl, Lorna .2003. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, California, Corwin Press.

Effendi, M. 2010. Prinsip Kurikulum Matematika Sekolah: Kajian Orientasi Pengembangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. ISBN 978-979-796-153-4. UMM Press.

Erman Suherman dkk. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Fitrah, M. 2015. Kemampuan Guru Matematika dalam Mengelola Kelas Melalui Sumber Belajar untuk Meningkatka Aktivitas Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika ISBN No. 978-979-028-728-0. Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Peta Konsep Prinsip Relevansi dalam Arah Pengembangan Kurikulum Matematika: Kajian Perspektif Pengembangan Kurikulum. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Matematika ISBN 978-979-168-358-6. Megister Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Firngadi, S. 1997. Mengatasi Gangguan Belajar Pada Anak. Kliping Pendidikan. Salatiga: UKSW.

Gulikers, Bastiaens, and Kirschner, P.A. 2004. Towards a Five Dimensional Model for Authentic Assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (3), 67-86.

Hamalik. 2005. Proses Balajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Hidayat, Sholeh. 2013. Pengembangan Kurikulum Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Huang, Grace Hui-Chen. 2006. Informal Forum: Fostering Active Learning In a Teacher Preparation Program. Journal of Education. v127 n1 p31-38.

Hudoyo, Herman. 1990. Strategi Mengajar Matematika. Malang: IKIP Malang.

Johnson, Elaine B. 2007. Contextual Teaching & Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar-Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.

Kulm, G. 1990. Assessing Higher Order Thinking in Mathematics. Washington: AAAS Press.

Kunandar. 2013. Penilaian Autentik Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perseda.

Lestari.E.K. 2014. Implementasi Brain-Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis serta Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan UNSIKA. Volume 2 Nomor 1, November. ISSN 2338-2996.

Melmer, R., Burmaster, E., & James, T. K. 2008. Attributes of Effective Formative Assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Moya, A. 2008. Elementos Para La Construcción de unModelo de Evaluación en Matemática Para el nivel de Educación Superior. Tesis

Muh. Fitrah, Mengidentifikasi Faktor Penghambat Guru Matematika

Doctoral No Publicada. UPEL. Instituto Pedagógico de Caracas, Caracas.

Niss, M. 1993. Investigations Into Assessment in Mathematics Education. An ICMI Study.

Odili , G.A. 2009. Redesigning Practice Teaching for a True Teaching Profession in Contemporary Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary Research. 6(1) 56-65.

Parker, J & Heywood, D. 2000. Exploring the Relationship Between Subject Knowledge and Pedagogic Content Knowledge in Primary Teachers’ Learning about Forces. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (1), pp. 89-111.

Purwoto. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Mengajar. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. 2000. Teachers, Schools and Academic Achievement. http://www.utdallas.edu/research/greenctr/papers

Rahman A., Scaife. F, Yahya.A.N & Jalil. A.B. 2010. Knowlege of Diverse Learnes: Implication for the Practice of Teaching. International Journal of Instruction Vol.3, No.2 e-ISSN: 1308-1470 p-ISSN: 1694-609X.

Riyanto, Yatim. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Surabaya: SIC

Romberg, T. 1995. Reform in School Mathematics and Authentic Assessment. Nueva York: Suny Press.

Sanjaya, W. 2009. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana

Setiawan. 2012. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC). Tesis SPS UPI: Tidak diterbitkan.

Suherman, Erman. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: UPI.

Surya Edy. 2011. Analisis Pemetaan dan Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika SMA di Kabupaten Tapteng dan Kota Sibolga Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika PARADIKMA, Vol 6 Nomor 1, hal 75-88.

Tim. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Waren, E. 2001. Algebraic Understanding: The Importance of Learning in the Yarly Years. In H. Chick (Eds), The Future of The Teaching and Learning of Algebra (Proceeding 12thof the ICMI Study Conference, pp. 663- 640), Melbourne, Australia: University Melbourne.

Webb, N. 1992. Assessment of Students Knowledge of Mathematics: Steps Toward a Theory. In Grouws, D. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: Macmillan.

Wiliam, A, & Cooper, T. J. 2001. Moving from Arithmetic to Algebra Under the Time Pressures of Real Classrooms. In H. Chick (Eds), The Future of The Teaching and Learning of Algebra (Proceeding 12thof the ICMI Study Conference, pp. 663-640), Melbourne, Australia: University Melbourne.

Jurnal Kependidikan 15 (1): 73-88

Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. 1997. Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implication for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57-67.

Valentino. E. & Sari.M. Y. 2015. Analisis Kesalahan dan Rekomendasi Perbaikan Buku Siswa Matematika Kelas VII SMP Semester I Kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika ISBN No. 978-979-028-728-0. Universitas Negeri Surabaya 25 April.

Zainal Arifin. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Al fabet.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-26

How to Cite

Fitrah, M. (2015). Mengidentifikasi Faktor Penghambat Guru Matematika Kecamatan Dompu NTB Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran pada Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v1i1.401

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1: Maret 2015

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.