Effect Size of Blended Learning Model in Improving Students' Science Competence

Authors

  • Mega Elvianasti Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. Hamka, Indonesia
  • Festiyed Festiyed Science Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Asrizal Asrizal Science Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Desnita Desnita Science Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Rosi Feirina Ritonga Biology Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i1.4449

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Effect Size, Science Competence.

Abstract

This study aims to measure the effect size of experimental research that focuses on the application of the blended learning model in science learning and measures students' scientific competence. The method in this study used a meta-analysis technique with a quantitative approach. We found 11 articles that matched the criteria with a range of 2015-2021 publication years from SINTA accredited national journals and reputable international journals. The data tabulation sheet was used as a research instrument containing criteria in the form of experimental and control groups by containing information on the number of samples, average, standard deviation, education level, country, type of control, and students' science skills. The data were analyzed using the openMEE application and it obtained a summary effect size of 0.861 so that it can be interpreted as being in the high category and it is assumed that blended learning is effective in improving students' science skills in the form of conceptual understanding, science process skills, critical thinking, and others. Blended learning can be recommended as learning that has the potential to be implemented in the current digital era and can be a reference for further researchers to develop blended learning models in science learning.

References

Akgündüz, D., & Akinoglu, O. (2017). The impact of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the academic success and motivation of the students in science education. Egitim ve Bilim, 42(191), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6444

Akhmalia, N. L., Suana, W., & Maharta, N. (2018). Efektivitas Blended Learning Berbasis LMS dengan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Fluida Statis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v2i2.299

Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424

Barhoumi, C. (2016). Studying the impact of blended learning that uses the online PBwiki guided by activity theory on LIS students’ knowledge management. Reference Services Review, 44(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2015-0040

Clayton, S. H., & B, H. M. (2012). Classifying K – 12 Blended Learning. INNOSIGHT Institute, May, 1–22. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf

Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies. Review of Educational Research, 51(3), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051003281

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Geçer, A. (2012). A Blended Learning Experience. 12(1), 438–442.

Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The effect of blended learning on student’s learning achievement and science process skills in plant tissue culture course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12134a

Harris, L. (2017). Blended Learning Benefits Academic Growth. 1.

Hoic-Bozic, N., Holenko Dlab, M., & Mornar, V. (2016). Recommender System and Web 2.0 Tools to Enhance a Blended Learning Model. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2015.2427116

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Hubackova, S., & Semradova, I. (2016). Evaluation of Blended Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.044

Hwang, R. H., Lin, H. T., Sun, J. C. Y., & Wu, J. J. (2019). Improving learning achievement in science education for elementary school students via blended learning. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(2), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019040104

Kelly, T. P. M. F. (2020). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.

Lin, K. Y. (2020). Application of a Blended Assessment Strategy to Enhance Student Interest and Effectiveness in Learning: Case Study with Information Security Literacy. CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing, 38(10), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000665

Mikolajewicz, N., & Komarova, S. V. (2019). Meta-analytic methodology for basic research: A practical guide. Frontiers in Physiology, 10(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00203

Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Internet and Higher Education Blended learning : A dangerous idea ? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001

Peddibhotla, N. (2016). Toward an understanding of development of learning to solve Ill-defined problems in an online context: A multi-year qualitative exploratory study. Online Learning Journal, 20(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.634

Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153

Prafitasari, F. (2021). Integration of Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning Using Blended Learning System. 5(3), 434–445.

Prihadi, Murtono, & Setiadi, G. (2021). Effectiveness of Blended Learning to Improve Critical Thinking Skills and Student Science Learning Outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012095

Seage, S. J., & Türegün, M. (2020). The effects of blended learning on STEM achievement of elementary school students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.728

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (n.d.). Essentials for Blended.

Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended Learning Improves Science Education. Cell, 162(5), 933–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.009

Sulisworo, D., Ummah, R., Nursolikh, M., & Rahardjo, W. (2020). The analysis of the critical thinking skills between blended learning implementation: Google Classroom and Schoology. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3 B), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081504

Sultoni, A., Priyatni, E. P., Nasih, A. M., Zahro, A., Juharyanto, & Ibrohim. (2021). Problems of online learning in a borderland of Indonesia in the COVID-19 pandemic. Community Empowerment through Research, Innovation and Open Access, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003189206-14

Szadziewska, A., & Kujawski, J. (2017). ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE BLENDED-LEARNING METHOD USED IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS AT THE FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK , IN THE OPINION OF UNDERGRAD .... ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE BLENDED- LEARNING METHOD USED IN TH. March 2018. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.1051

Tshabalala, M., Ndeya-ndereya, C., & Merwe, T. Van Der. (2014). Implementing Blended Learning at a Developing University : Obstacles in the way. 12(1), 101–110.

Zawawi, W. A. I. W. M., Radzali, U. S., Jumari, N. F., Yusof, K. M., Daud, M. F., & Mustaffa, A. A. (2017). Impact of blended learning open source science or math studies interactive video in the learning of first law of thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56, 985–990. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1756165

Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Advantages of certainty and uncertainty. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 455–472). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-22

How to Cite

Elvianasti, M., Festiyed, F., Asrizal, A., Desnita, D., & Ritonga, R. F. (2022). Effect Size of Blended Learning Model in Improving Students’ Science Competence. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i1.4449

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): March

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.