Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Based on Bloom Taxonomy in Comprehensive Examination Questions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i4.5885

Keywords:

HOTS, Bloom Taxonomy, Comprehensive Examination.

Abstract

The study aims to examine the distribution of questions in the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) category on the comprehensive examination of the Biblical Major at the IAKN Manado Theology Study Program, with the indicator for the Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) questions based on the revised Bloom's Taxonomy. A descriptive method with a qualitative approach was applied. Data which was sourced from the comprehensive examination of Biblical Major at Theology Study Program of IAKN Manado, then analyzed using an interactive analysis model by Miles and Huberman, including data condensation, data display, verification, and conclusion. Analysis of questions was according to the revised Bloom's Taxonomy by Anderson & Krathwohl (2001). The results indicated that the comprehensive examination questions of Biblical majors at the Theology Study Program were taken from 15 courses with a total of 100 questions. Of the 100 questions, it was found that 9 courses contained HOTS questions and 6 courses contained questions classified in the MOTS and LOTS categories. Specifically, the percentages in each cognitive level were as follows, C6 at 1%, C5 at 16%, C4 at 23%, C3 at 38%, C2 at 8% and C1 at 14%. Thus, the HOTs level achieved 40%, the MOTS level reached 38%, while the LOTS level got 22%. It was concluded that the comprehensive examination questions of the Biblical Major at the Theology Study Program of IAKN Manado were dominated by the HOTS questions, although they were not evenly distributed in all questions of the subjects tested. The results of this study can be used as a reference in the preparation of exam questions for all subjects, so that the test administrator team or educators can determine the quality of each question made. Furthermore, the test administrators will also be able to map the categories of questions based on HOTS, MOTS, and LOTS, therefore the exam questions quality can be improved which affects the increase of students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS).

References

Afifuddin, & Beni Ahmad Saebani. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (3rd ed.). Pustaka Setia.

Ahmad, I. F., & Sukiman, S. (2019). Analisis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Soal Ujian Akhir Siswa Kelas 6 KMI dalam Kelompok Mata Pelajaran Dirosah Islamiyah di Pondok Modern Tazakka Batang. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 16(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2019.162-02

Basuki, I., & Hariyanto. (2014). Asesmen Pembelajaran. Rosdakarya.

Damis, R. (2018). Efektivitas Ujian Komprehensif dalam Meningkatkan Kompotensi Mahasiswa Prodi Ilmu Aqidah. Jurnal Aqidah-Ta, IV(1), 57–72.

Fanani, Moh. Z. (2018). Strategi Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) dalam Kurikulum 2013. Edudeena, II(1), 57–76.

H. Daryanto. (2012). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Rineke Cipta.

Hariyatmi, & Annisa Rahma Luthfia. (2020). Profil Soal Ulangan Biologi SMA di Kecamatan Kartasura dari Perspektif HOTS.

Huda, M., Purnomo, E., Anggraini, D., & Prameswari, D. H. (2021). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) dalam Materi dan Soal pada Buku Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMA Terbitan Kemendikbud RI. PRASI, 16(02), 128. https://doi.org/10.23887/prasi.v16i02.40671

Huriyah, L., Fahmi, M., Baru, R., & Ilaihi, W. (2020). Quo Vadis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Soal UM-PTKIN Materi Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education Studies), 8(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.15642/jpai.2020.8.2.133-152

Iffa, U., Fakhruddin, & Yennita. (n.d.). Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Student in Problem Solving of Physics Science National Examination.

Kristanto, P. D., & Setiawan, P. G. F. (2020). Pengembangan Soal HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Terkait dengan Konteks Pedesaan.PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika2. PRISMA, 3, 370–376. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Majid, A. (2013). Perencanaan Pembelajaran (Mukhlis, Ed.; 10th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mawardi, A. V., Yanti, A. W., & Arrifadah, Y. (2020). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2020.5.1.40-52

Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. (2020). Permendikbud No. 3 Tahun 2020. www.peraturan.go.id

Menteri Riset, T. dan P. T. (2015). Permenristekdikti Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 Tentang SNPT (Salinan).

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edition). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Palar, Y. N. (2020). Peningkatan HOTS Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning) di IAKN Manado. The Way: Jurnal Teologi Dan Kependidikan, 6(1), 1–17.

Pramono, S. (2014). Panduan Evaluasi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. Diva Press.

Presiden RI. (2003). Undang-Undang RI No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Presiden RI. (2012). Undang-Undang RI No. 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.

Purbosari, D., Dewi, E. R. S., & Sulianto, J. (2021). Analisis Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) Tema 6 ditinjau dari High Order Thingking Skills(HOTS) Pada Kelas VI SD Negeri 1 Klewor Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. DIKDAS MATAPPA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar, 4(3), 376–384.

Sabir, A., Usman, D., Daeng, J., Raya, T., & Selatan, S. (2021). Analisis Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Berdasarkan Dimensi Kognitif. Indonesia: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/indonesia

Sriyanti, A., Samdewi, A. R., Mania, S., & Yuliany, N. (2022). Analisis Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) pada Buku Ajar Matematika SMK Kelas XI. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(2), 2385–2394. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2400

Sudjana, N. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar (T. Surjaman, Ed.; Vol. 18). Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabet.

Sujarwanta, A. (2021, August 20). Perspektif MBKM dalam Pendidikan Tinggi. HUMAS UM METRO.

Suryapuspitarini, B. K., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Analisis Soal-Soal Matematika Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) pada Kurikulum 2013 untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Siswa. Prisma, 876–884. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Susilo, W. (2018). Strategi menegakkan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi Berbasis KKNI. ANDI.

Suwarna, I. P., & Ilmi, D. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Ujian Komprehensif Mahasiswa melalui Computer Based Test pada Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika.

Suyati, Y. L. A., Martono, & Priyadi, A. T. (n.d.). Analisis Soal Tipe HOTS dalam Soal Ujian Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SMP Kabupaten Sanggau.

Wartoni, & Issak Benyamin, P. (n.d.). Strategi Pengembangan Tes Objektif (Pilihan Ganda).

Widana, W. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Soal HOTS. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-02

How to Cite

Tuela, A. I., & Palar, Y. N. (2022). Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Based on Bloom Taxonomy in Comprehensive Examination Questions. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 8(4), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i4.5885

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2022): December

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.