Mapping of Disability Management Publications Using Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

  • Budi Agung Prasetya Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Billy Tunas Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Widya Parimita Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Adi Setiawan Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.6668

Keywords:

Disability Management, Bibliometric, Disabilities.

Abstract

This research aims to identify scientific mapping and research developments related to Disability Management. Research related to disability management is needed to guide the implementation of disability management. The research method used a qualitative method using a historical approach. The research data were articles published by reputable journal publishers that use the Publish or Perish (PoP) application. Data analysis used bibliometric analysis assisted by VOSviewer. The bibliometric output visualized the keyword network and maps obtained from the titles and abstracts contained in the collected articles. The study results showed that the mapping and development of studies related to stability management are as follows: First, the publication trend of articles related to disability management which began in 1987, experienced fluctuating conditions. The data showed that research related to disability management was starting to receive attention from academics. Second, the results of the co-authorship analysis showed that there were 149 collaborating on research. Eleven authors carried out the most significant collaborations. The most articles produced by the author are seven articles. This condition showed the authors' high commitment to continue developing knowledge related to disability management. Third, a Network Visualization analysis with VOSviewer software produced 133 keywords related to stability management. These keywords were divided into 11 clusters. Keywords that were often researched were related to "intellectual disability", "perspective", "equity", "organization", "fairness", "risk, individual", "competence", "management disability practice" and "disability prevention".

Author Biography

Budi Agung Prasetya, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon

Doctoral Program In Management Science, Postgraduate

References

Allan, J. (2010). The sociology of disability and the struggle for inclusive education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2010.500093

Almond, S., & Healey, A. (2003). Mental health and absence from work: New evidence from the uk quarterly labour force survey. Work, Employment and Society, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017003174007

Bailey, J. W. (1991). Evaluation of a task partner who does or does not have a physical disability: Response amplification or sympathy effect? Rehabilitation Psychology, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079075

Bell, B. S., & Klein, K. J. (2001). Effects of disability, gender, and job level on ratings of job applicants. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.46.3.229

Berthoud, R. (2008). Disability employment penalties in Britain. Work, Employment and Society, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017007087420

Bjorvatn, K., & Tungodden, B. (2015). Disabled by stereotype? Experimental evidence from Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.027

Blease, C., Carel, H., & Geraghty, K. (2017). Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: Evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(8). https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103691

Colella, A. (1994). Organizational socialization of employees with disabilities: Critical issues and implications for workplace interventions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110048

Colella, A., & Stone, D. L. (2004). Workplace discrimination toward persons with disabilities: A call for some new research directions. In Discrimination at Work: The Psychological and Organizational Bases. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611567

Desombre, C., Anegmar, S., & Delelis, G. (2018). Stereotype threat among students with disabilities: the importance of the evaluative context on their cognitive performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0327-4

di Vaio, A., Syriopoulos, T., Alvino, F., & Palladino, R. (2020). “Integrated thinking and reporting†towards sustainable business models: a concise bibliometric analysis. In Meditari Accountancy Research (Vol. 29, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0641

Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038636

Foster, D. (2018). The Health and Well-Being at Work Agenda: Good News for (Disabled) Workers or Just a Capital Idea? Work, Employment and Society, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016682458

Franche, R. L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., Frank, J., Cole, D., Dacombe, J., Guzman, J., Hogg-Johnson, S., MacEachen, E., Pennick, V., Raj, A., Reardon, R., & van Eerd, D. (2005). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8038-8

Goldberg, S. G., Killeen, M. B., & O’Day, B. (2005). The disclosure conundrum: How people with psychiatric disabilities navigate employment. In Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (Vol. 11, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.463

Grover, C., & Piggott, L. (2010). From incapacity benefit to employment and support allowance: Social sorting, sickness and impairment, and social security. Policy Studies, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870903429678

Habeck, R., & Hunt, A. (1999). Disability management perspectives: Developing accommodating work environments through disability management. American Rehabilitation, 25(Spring-Summer).

Harzing, A. W. K., & van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00076

Jenaro, C., Flores, N., & López-Lucas, J. (2018). Using the Semantic Differential technique to assess stereotypes toward individuals with disabilities: The relevance of warmth and competence. Universitas Psychologica, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy17-4.usdt

Jones, M. K. (2006). Is there employment discrimination against the disabled? Economics Letters, 92(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.01.008

Jones, M. K. (2016). Disability and Perceptions of Work and Management. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12043

Jones, M. K., & Latreille, P. L. (2010). Disability and earnings: Are employer characteristics important? Economics Letters, 106(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.11.017

José de Oliveira, O., Francisco da Silva, F., Juliani, F., César Ferreira Motta Barbosa, L., & Vieira Nunhes, T. (2019). Bibliometric Method for Mapping the State-of-the-Art and Identifying Research Gaps and Trends in Literature: An Essential Instrument to Support the Development of Scientific Projects. In Scientometrics Recent Advances. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85856

Kementrian PPN/ Bappenas. (2021). Kajian Distabilitas. Tinjauan Peningkatan Akses dan Taraf Hidup. Penyandang Distabilitas Indonesia: Aspek Sosio Ekonomi dan Yuridis.

Labriola, M. (2008). Conceptual framework of sickness absence and return to work, focusing on both the individual and the contextual level. In Work (Vol. 30, Issue 4).

Lafont, J., Ruiz, F., Gil-Gómez, H., & Oltra-Badenes, R. (2020). Value creation in listed companies: A bibliometric approach. Journal of Business Research, 115, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2020.01.012

Li, X., Wu, P., Shen, G. Q., Wang, X., & Teng, Y. (2017). Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): A bibliometric approach. In Automation in Construction (Vol. 84). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.011

Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., Scheel, I., van Tulder, M., & Webster, B. (2005). Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2

Longhi, S., Nicoletti, C., & Platt, L. (2012). Interpreting Wage Gaps of Disabled Men: The Roles of Productivity and of Discrimination. Southern Economic Journal, 78(3). https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.3.931

Prashar, A., & Sunder M, V. (2020). A bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118665. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.118665

Ren, L. R., Paetzold, R. L., & Colella, A. (2008a). A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.001

Ren, L. R., Paetzold, R. L., & Colella, A. (2008b). A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.001

RV, H., & HA, H. (1999). Disability management perspectives: developing accommodating work environments through disability management. American Rehabilitation, 25(1/2).

Sang, K., Calvard, T., & Remnant, J. (2022). Disability and Academic Careers: Using the Social Relational Model to Reveal the Role of Human Resource Management Practices in Creating Disability. Work, Employment and Society, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017021993737

Schultz, I. Z., Stowell, A. W., Feuerstein, M., & Gatchel, R. J. (2007). Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9071-6

Shi, Y., & Li, X. (2019). A bibliometric study on intelligent techniques of bankruptcy prediction for corporate firms. Heliyon, 5(12), e02997. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2019.E02997

Thomas, C. (2004). Rescuing a social relational understanding of disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410409512637

Trani, J. F., Ballard, E., & Peña, J. B. (2016). Stigma of persons with disabilities in Afghanistan: Examining the pathways from stereotyping to mental distress. Social Science and Medicine, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.024

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual - version 1.6.8. Univeristeit Leiden, April.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-16

How to Cite

Prasetya, B. A., Tunas, B., Parimita, W., & Setiawan, A. (2023). Mapping of Disability Management Publications Using Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.6668

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): March

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.