PISA Assessment on Reading Literacy Competency : Evidence from Students in Urban, Mountainous and Island Areas

Authors

  • Johar Amir Indonesian Language Education Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ambo Dalle Indonesian Language Education Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sulastriningsih Dj Indonesian Language Education Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Irmawati Irmawati English Language Studies, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.7103

Keywords:

Reading Literacy, Competency, PISA Assessment.

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the reading literacy competence of students in class VIII junior high school in Pangkajene and Islands Regency to find, understand, and evaluate information from reading texts. The research used the descriptive quantitative method. The population in this study were all class VIII students spread throughout Pangkajene and Islands Regency were divided into urban, mountainous and island areas totaling 114 schools where the sample selection used purposive sampling and cluster sampling techniques. The technique for collecting data is the test technique. The research instrument was PISA’s questions in 2021. The test PISA’s results showed that 26.7- 60% of students in Class VIII from the three schools in Pangkajene and Islands Regencies had very low competence in finding information, with a score of <54. Then in understanding the reading text, they could only obtain an average score of 33.03. As for the ability to evaluate text, 96.6% of students were in the low category, and only 3.4% were in the high category. This research indicated that students at the junior high school level needed the PISA assessment system to improve the quality of educational competence in Indonesia towards international education standards in the 21st century, especially in reading literacy. The PISA assessment focuses on improving the quality of teaching by teachers and learning in individual students. So that regular PISA assessments can help all students to achieve high competence if the government, school principals and teachers work together to implement and evaluate the PISA assessment on the reading literacy method.

Author Biographies

Johar Amir, Indonesian Language Education Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Lecturer in English Literature

Ambo Dalle, Indonesian Language Education Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Lecture in Indonesian Literature and Education

Sulastriningsih Dj, Indonesian Language Education Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Indonesiaon and Germany Literature and Education

References

Cosgrove, J., & Cartwright, F. (2014). Changes in achievement on PISA: the case of Ireland and implications for international assessment practice. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0739-2-2

Emilia, E., Sujatna, E. T. S., & Kurniasih, N. (2022). Training teachers to teach PISA-like reading: A case in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46534

Harju-Luukkainen, H., Vettenranta, J., Ouakrim-Soivio, N., & Bernelius, V. (2016). Differences between students’ PISA reading literacy scores and grading for mother tongue and literature at school: A geostatistical analysis of the Finnish PISA 2009 data. Education Inquiry, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29413

Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726

Kemdikbud, (2022). https://dapo.kemdikbud.go.id/sp/2/190200

Ibrahim, I., & Muslimah, M. (2021). Tekhnik Pemeriksaan Jawaban, Pemberian Skor, Konversi Nilai dan Standar Penilaian. Jurnal Al-Qiyam, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33648/alqiyam.v2i1.114

Koyuncu, İ., & Fırat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189

Markus, S. (2019). The Programme for International Student.

Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA Result and Impact on The Reading Learning Program in Indonesia. 297(Icille 2018), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Vol. 1 excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematics and Financial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks. Pisa 2018, May 2016, 1–170. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/PISA-2018-draft-frameworks.pdf

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Organization for Economic Co-operation; Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754- en

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-enParrila, R. K., dan H. Stack Cutler.(2011). Literacy and Reading Behavior. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 1: 203–11.

OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 results: Vol. 2 where all students can succeed. c. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en.

Oktavia, R., & Hardinata, A. (2020). Tingkat Literasi Digital Siswa Ditinjau dari Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi sebagai Mobile Learning dalam Pembelajaran Biologi pada Siswa Mengengah Atas (SMA) Kecamatan Kuala Nagan Raya. Bionatural, VII(2), 26–34.

Pearson. (2016). AZELLA Technical Report 2016.

Penilaian Pendidikan Badan Penelitian, P., Pendidikan, D., Pendidikan, K., & Kebudayaan, D. (n.d.). PENDIDIKAN DI INDONESIA.

Pratama, M. A., Supahar, Lestari, D. P., Sari, W. K., Putri, T. S. Y., & Adiatmah, V. A. K. (2020). Data literacy assessment instrument for preparing 21 Cs literacy: Preliminary study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012085

Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2021). 21st-Century Readers. In Oecd. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/21st-century-readers_a83d84cb-en

Puteh, M., Zin, Z. M., & Ismail, I. (2016). Reading performance of Malaysian students across gender in PISA 2012. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2016-2202-08

Putera, P. B., Ningrum, S., Widianingsih, I., Rianto, Y., & Suryanto, S. (2022). The Bookkeeping System Policy and Literacy Movement in Indonesia. Bappenas Working Papers, 5(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v5i3.182

Rachmatullah, A., Diana, S., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2016). Profile of middle school students on scientific literacy achievements by using scientific literacy assessments (SLA). AIP Conference Proceedings, 1708(February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941194

Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setianingsih, W., & Setyawarno, D. (2020). Developing Assessment Instruments of PISA Model to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving Skills and Scientific Literacy in Junior High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 8(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v8i2.17468

Sahyar, Bunawan, W., Rangkuti, M. A., & Yanti, J. (2020). High-Level Comprehension Skill by using Competencies PISA in Indonesia’s Education System. 384(Aisteel), 737–741. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.169

She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and Mathematics Literacy: PISA for Better School Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1

Tavdgiridze, L. (2016). Literacy Competence Formation of the Modern School. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 107–110. http://proxy.libraries.smu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1115864&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Tiarina, Y., Wahyuni, S., Fitri, D., Sakinah, N., & Afif, A. F. (2022). PISA reading literacy: encountering female and male’ reading literacy ability. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(2), 593. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i2.6263

Vázquez-Cano, E., Gómez-Galán, J., Infante-Moro, A., & López-Meneses, E. (2020). Incidence of a non-sustainability use of technology on students’ reading performance in Pisa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020749

Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a

Downloads

Published

2023-03-16

How to Cite

Amir, J., Dalle, A., Dj, S., & Irmawati, I. (2023). PISA Assessment on Reading Literacy Competency : Evidence from Students in Urban, Mountainous and Island Areas. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.7103

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): March

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.