Integrity of Discourse in the Radar Sulawesi Barat Daily Newspaper : The Use of Cohesion and Coherence in Learning Indonesian to Improve Students' Literacy and Knowledge Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i1.7128Keywords:
Discourse, Cohesion, Coherence, Newspaper, Learning Strategies, Learning Indonesian.Abstract
This study aims to analyze cohesion and coherence in forming the wholeness of the discourse contained in the Radar Sulawesi Barat daily. This research was qualitative. The data was collected using listening and note-taking techniques with several stages: reading, marking, and classifying. The data obtained in this study were written as elements that made up the wholeness of the discourse. The method and technique of data analysis used was the intralingual equivalent method with the comparison technique of equating the main points. Based on the study's results, cohesion and coherence shape the wholeness of discourse in the Radar Sulawesi Barat daily. Discourse cohesion found in this study was a marker of grammatical and lexical cohesion. Grammatical cohesion markers include (1) references, (2) substitutions, and (3) conjunctions. Lexical cohesion markers are repetition; the repetition obtained consists of (1) complete repetition, (2) repetition with changes in form, (3) repetition with changes, (4) repetition with synonym changes, and (5) repetition with hyponyms. In addition to repetition, a marker of lexical cohesion was also found, namely collocation. Furthermore, the element that forms the wholeness of discourse was coherence. This study had a meaning or semantic relationship between elements or sentences in the discourse, which can be used as a strategy for learning Indonesian.
References
Asih, K. M. (2020). Kohesi dan koherensi dalam wacana surat kabar Jawa Pos Rubrik Zetizen. BAPALA, 7(1), 1–6.
Bonvillain, N. (2020). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages (N. Roberts & M. Manzano, Eds.; 8th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media. Review of Communication, 18(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881
Breeze, R. (2022). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 21(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre
Coulthard, M. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis (C. N. Condlin, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835884
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Hanafiah, W. (2014). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi pada wacana Buletin Jumat. Epigram, 11(2), 135–152.
Hapsari, W. S. P., & Setiawan, T. (2019). An analysis of word meaning in persuasive discourse on Merry Riana’s quotes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Language, Literature and Education (ICILLE 2018), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.94
Hasnah, Darwis, M., & Asriani. (2018). Pewujudan kohesi dan koherensi pada jurnal refleksi guru bahasa Indonesia SMP di Kabupaten Maros. 221 | JURNAL ILMU BUDAYA, 6(2), 1–9.
Humaira, H. W. (2018). Analisis wacana kritis (AWK) model Teun A. Van Dijk Pada pemberitaan surat kabar Republika. Jurnal Literasi, 2(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v2i1.951
Kemendikbud Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37, Tahun 2018, tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and culture. AILA Review, 27, 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.27.02kra
Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (2017). Morphology and lexical semantics. In The Handbook of Morphology (pp. 248–271). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166348.ch12
Malterud, K. (2012). Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40(8), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812465030
Martin, J. R. (2015). Cohesion and Texture. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 61–81). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch3
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (H. Salmon, K. Perry, K. Koscielak, & L. Barrett, Eds.; 3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z., & Sheese, R. (2012). Cognitive development: Neo-piagetian perspectives. Taylor & Francis Group.
Mukhlis, M., al Masjid, A., Widyanimgrum, H. K., Komariah, K., & Sumarlam. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis model Teun A. van Dijk pada surat kabar online dengan tajuk kilas balik pembelajaran jarak jauh akibat pandemi Covid-19. GERAM (Gerakan Aktif Menulis), 8(2), 73–85.
Nisa, K. (2019). Hubungan penguasaan piranti kohesi dan koherensi dengan keterampilan menulis eksposisi. Jurnal Dialog, 8(2), 917–926.
Pitoyo, A. (2021). Ragam kohesi leksikal pada rubrik pembaca menulis koran Jawa Pos. Efektor, 8(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.29407/e.v8i1.15868
Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “Testing and assessment†research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Ramadlan, M. F. S., & Afala, L. O. M. (2022). Politik media, media politik: Pers, rezim, dan kemunduran demokrasi. UB Press.
Sari, P. A., Ermanto, E., & Agustina, A. (2018). Lexical cohesion grammatical markers in scientific papers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2018), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclle-18.2018.60
Setiawati, E., & Rusmawati, R. (2019). Analisis wacana: Konsep, teori, dan aplikasi. UB Press.
Setiawati, S., & Pratiwi, H. A. (2015). Aspek kohesi konjungsi dalam wacana opini pada majalah Tempo dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Gramatika, 1(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2015.v1i1.1162
Sitoro, F. L., Prabawa, A. H., Nasucha, Y., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2020). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi wacana berita rubrik nasional pada majalah online Tempo. Diglosia: Jurnal Pendidikan, Kebahasaan, Dan Kesusastraan Indonesia, 4(2), 362–370.
Steensen, S. (2011). Online journalism and the promises of new technology. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.501151
Tardan, P. P., Erwin, A., Eng, K. I., & Muliady, W. (2013). Automatic text summarization based on semantic analysis approach for documents in Indonesian language. 2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2013.6676209
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466–485). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
Vieira, R. M., & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. (2016). Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9605-2
Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465
Widiatmoko, W. (2015). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi wacana berita rubrik nasional di majalah online Detik. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 1–12. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jsi
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.