An Instrument Development to Measure the Creative Habits of Mind for Prospective Elementary School Teachers

Authors

  • Neni Maulidah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-3418
  • Sapriya Sapriya Elementary Education, Graduate School, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Nana Supriatna Elementary Education, Graduate School, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8389

Keywords:

Measurement Instruments, Creative Habits of Mind, Prospective Elementary School Teachers.

Abstract

This study aims to produce an instrument for measuring the creative habits of mind for prospective elementary school teachers in relation to developing creative teaching and learning ideas. This study is development research using the ADDIE model, which consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The study was conducted by involving one expert validator and one practitioner validator. At the implementation stage, trials were carried out on a number of 15 prospective elementary school teacher students. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative data analysis.  The results of the instrument validations for measuring creative habits of mind show that creativity development and creative pedagogy development experts consider the instrument to be well qualified and suitable for measuring the creative habits of mind for prospective elementary school teacher students. The average test results in small groups of both lecturers and students show that the resulting instruments are in good qualifications. The end result of this development research is an instrument for measuring the creative habits of mind for prospective elementary school students who are  well-qualified, appropriate, and ready to use.

References

Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: What do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured? Roeper Review, 39(1), 9–23.

Agaoglu, O., & DemIr, M. (2020). The integration of 21st century skills into education: an evaluation based on an activity example. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 7(3), 105–114.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.

Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: review and synthesis. The Journal of Creative Behavior.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer.

Care, E., Griffin, P., & McGaw, B. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer.

Cigerci, F. M. (2020). Primary School Teacher Candidates and 21st Century Skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 157–174.

Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.

Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, 1–15.

Guilford, Joan P. (1973). Characteristics of Creativity.

Guilford, Joy P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110.

Guilford, Joy P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14.

Guilford, Joy Paul. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444.

Guilford, Joy Paul. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. Edits Pub.

Guilford, Joy Peter. (2017). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59). Routledge.

Haefele, J. W. (1962). Creativity and innovation. (No Title).

Howells, K. (2018). The future of education and skills: education 2030: the future we want.

Kautz, T., Heckman, J. J., Diris, R., Ter Weel, B., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success.

Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: Unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 37–48.

Lin, Y. S. (2011). Fostering creativity through education--a conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2(03), 149.

Lucas, B. (2016). A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 278–290.

Lucas, B. (2019). Teaching and assessing creativity in schools in England. Impact Journal, 7(1), 5–8.

Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments.

Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. ERIC.

Maulidah, N., & Amelia, D. (2022). Kebiasaan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau dari Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia.

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Terapan. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta.

O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (2006). Using the creative product semantic scale as a metric for results-oriented business. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 34–44.

P21. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. https://doi.org/ERIC Number ED519462

P21. (2019). Framework For 21st Century Learning Definitions. http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_DefinitionsBFK.pdf

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

Robinson, K. (2006). Do schools kill creativity.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: Revolutionizing education from the ground up. Penguin UK.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2016). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Penguin books.

Saxena, S. (2015). How do you teach the 4Cs to students (Part-1): Creativity and innovation. Nioda Dehli NCR: Amity University.

Supriatna, N., & Maulidah, N. (2020). Pedagogi kreatif: menumbuhkan kreativitas dalam pembelajaran sejarah dan ips. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking: What It Means in School. Educational Research and Innovation. ERIC.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-16

How to Cite

Maulidah, N., Sapriya, S., & Supriatna, N. (2023). An Instrument Development to Measure the Creative Habits of Mind for Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 846–857. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8389

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): September

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.