Construction of Teaching Materials To Facilitate 21st Century Learning on Critical and Creative Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.9442Keywords:
Teaching Material, Creative Thinking, Critical Thinking, 21st Skill.Abstract
This research aims to produce teaching materials based on 21st century learning for prospective teacher students that are valid and effective. The method of this research was research and development (R&D) using the Thiagarajan 4D model. This model consists of several stages, namely definition, design, development, and dissemination. The test subjects of this research were 27 third-semester mathematics education students at the University of Mataram. Data was collected using a validation questionnaire for teaching materials for material experts, media, practitioners and lecturer and student response questionnaires. Meanwhile, effectiveness data was obtained from student scores on ability tests at the end of using teaching materials. The data was analyzed descriptively to categorize the classical completeness from the scores. The results of the research showed that the teaching materials for teaching critical and creative thinking skills met the criteria valid according to the assessment of material experts, media experts, practitioner experts, lecturers, and students, and their effectiveness has been tested so that it can be concluded that this module meets the requirements for use in learning to build creative thinking and critical thinking skills. These teaching materials can be references for teachers to study how to stimulate student’s critical and creative thinking.Â
References
Cahyaningsih, U., & Nahdi, D. S. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Sd Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education Yang Berorientasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 6(2), 598–604.
Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627
Edgar, D. R., & Baylon, M. (2014). Effects of Classroom Assessment on the Critical Thinking and Academic Performance of Students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1).
Ekantini, A., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). The Development of Science Student Worksheet Based on Education for Environmental Sustainable Development to Enhance Scientific Literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060625
English, L. D., & Kirshner, D. (2015). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Routledge.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Permission to Reprint for Non-Commercial Uses Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Peter A. Facione, Measured Reasons LLC.
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1(1), 1–29.
Firdaus, F., Kailani, I., Bakar, M. N. B., & Bakry, B. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills of students in mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 226–236.
Kampylis, P., & Berki, E. (2014). Nurturing creative thinking. Unesco.
Kosasih, E. (2021). Pengembangan bahan ajar. Bumi Aksara.
Magdalena, I., Sundari, T., Nurkamilah, S., Nasrullah, N., & Amalia, D. A. (2020). Analisis bahan ajar. Nusantara, 2(2), 311–326.
Manalo, E., & Sheppard, C. (2016). How might language affect critical thinking performance? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.005
Maryamah, I., Anriani, N., & Fathurrohman, M. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Materi Pythagoras yang Berorientasi padaKompetensi Abad 21 untuk Guru SMP. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(1), 67–77.
Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Rineka Cipta.
National Education Association. (2012). Preparing 21st Century Students for a Global Society: An educator’s Guide to the “Four Cs.†National Education Association.
Octaviyani, I., Kusumah, Y. S., & Hasanah, A. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Project-Based Learning Dengan Pendekatan Stem. Journal on Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 10–14.
Park, J. H., Niu, W., Cheng, L., & Allen, H. (2021). Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking in College: A Cross-Cultural Investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5041.
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2016). Analisis Penguasaan Objek Matematika (Kajian pada Lulusan SMA). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 1(2), 146–154.
Rizki, S., & Linuhung, N. (2016). Design Research and Development 4D Model for Developing Mathematics Teaching Materials. The First International Conference on Education ICONLEE, 288–291. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352834773
Sadjati, I. M. (2012). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar: Hakikat Bahan Ajar. Universitas Terbuka.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Talebinejad, M. R., & Matou, Z. (2012). Teacher-student interaction in EFL reading comprehension contexts at university level: A critical thinking perspective. SAGE Open, 2(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012459335
Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, & And Others. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook.
Utami, D. A., Irianto, S., & Muryaningsih, S. (2020). Pengembangan Handout Kurikulum 2013 Berbasis Kompetensi Peserta Didik Abad 21 Kelas IV Di SD Negeri Kembaran. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 4(2), 151–162.
Vong, S. A., & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002
Widoyoko, E. P. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing AgreementIn submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.