Academic Hardiness Scale of College Students : Validity and Reliability Analysis Using Rasch Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i2.14846Keywords:
Academic Hardiness, Intsrument, Rasch Model, Validity, Reliability.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of the academic hardiness scale that has been developed in the context of Indonesian culture. This research method used a survey with a quantitative approach to 50 students at the University of West Sulawesi. The data analysis technique was carried out using the Rasch Model. The results of the study showed that this academic hardiness scale was quite good at describing the profile of students' academic hardiness with a raw variance explained value of 38.8%. This scale was also reliable, with a person reliability value of 0.94 and an item reliability of 0.95, which reflects the consistency of the measurement. These findings have significant implications for further research in developing a guidance and counseling service program model that is more responsive to the needs of students in higher education, which is based on empirical evidence. This can be achieved by producing a consistent measurement scale to provide accurate information regarding the profile of students' academic hardiness in higher education.
References
Amalia, B. (2022). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Adiksi Media Sosial Pada remaja. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (4th ed.). Jakarta: Rineka Cita.
Arsyad, M. (2021). Teori Belajar dan Peran Guru pada Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri
0. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Benishek, L.A., & Lopez, F.G. (2001). Development And Initial Validation of A Measure Of Academic Hardiness. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 333-352.
Benishek, L.A., Feldman, J.M., Shipon, R.W., Mecham, S.D., & Lopez, F.G. (2005). Development and evaluation of revised academic hardiness scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 59-76.
Benishek, L.A., Lopez, F.G. (2001). Development and initial validation of a measure of academic hardiness. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 333-352.
Boone, et.al. (2014). RASCH Analysis in the Human Sciences. London: Springer.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4 Edition). California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Fajrianthi, F., Hendriani, W., & Septarini, B. G. (2016). Pengembangan Tes Berpikir Kritis Dengan Pendekatan Item Response Theory. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 45–55.
Heiberger, R. M., & Holland, B. (2015). Statistical Analysis and Data Display: An Intermediate Course with Examples in R. Springer New York, NY.
Ilfiandra, I., Nadhirah, N. A., Suryana, D., & binti Ahmad, A. (2022). Development and Validation Peaceful Classroom Scale: Rasch Model Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 497–514.
Kobasa. S. C, Maddi, S., & Puccetti. M. C. (1982). Personality And Exercise As Buffers In The Stress Illness Relationship. Journal Of Behavioral Medicine, 5(4), 391 - 404.
Kumaraswamy, N. (2013). Academic Stress, Anxiety and Depression among College Student- A Brief Review. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5 (1), 135- 143.
Linacre, J. M. (2006). A User’s guide to WINSTEPS Ministeps; Rasch-model Computer Program.
Maddi, S. R. (2013). Hardiness: Turning Stressful Circumstances into Resilient Growth. New York: Springer.
Maidiana, M. (2021). Penelitian Survey. ALACRITY: Journal of Education, 1(2), 20–29.
Muhajirin, M., & Panoraman, M. (2017). Pendekatan Praktis Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Idea Press Yogyakarta.
Nayyeri, M., & Aubi, S. (2011). Prediction Well-Being on Basic Components of Hardiness.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1571- 1575.
Nurlatifah, S., Supriatna, M., Yudha, E. S., & J Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer.
Nurlatifah, S., Supriatna, M., Yudha, E. S., & Julius, A. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Kecakapan Kerja Mahasiswa (Rasch Model Analisis). GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 13(4), 792.
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104 (1), 1–15.
Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological Weil-Being in Adult life. 4, 99–104.
Siregar, S. (2017). Statistika Parametrik untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bumi Aksara Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan RASCH pada Asesmen
Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.
Wardani, Ria. (2020). Academic hardiness, skills, and psychological well-being on new student. Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 19(2), 188-200
Wibisono, S. (2016). Aplikasi Model RASCH Untuk Validasi Instrumen Pengukuran Fundamentalisme Agama Bagi Responden Muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, III (3), 729–748.
Yendi, F. M., Tririzky, R., Antoni, F., Ifdil, I., & Sukmawati, I. (2021). EMDR: An Alternative Effective Tool for Reduction of Academic Stress? Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 4133–4139.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
