Student Engagement Online Pada Masa Pembelajaran Daring : Analisis Dimensi dan Faktor Demografi

Authors

  • Afriliani Dwi Hartati Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
  • Megawati Batubara Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-7839

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v10i1.6523

Keywords:

Student Engagement, Online Learning, Demographics.

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the dimensions of online student engagement for students of the Faculty of Psychology, Padjadjaran University, during the online learning period and the demographic factors that influence it. The method used in this research was non-experimental with a quantitative approach. The research subjects were students of level one to level four of the Bachelor of Psychology Program at Padjadjaran University, totaling 94 people (level one = 26.6%, level two = 20.2%, level three = 25.5%, and level four = 27.7%), which was obtained using the method stratified random sampling. The instrument used was the Online Student Engagement Questionnaire (SEQ), totaling thirty-one items. The analysis technique used was descriptive analysis and t-test. The results of this study indicated that Psychology Undergraduate Program students had different levels of involvement in each online SEQ dimension. Students in this study showed high involvement in online engagement, active online learning, online teaching, online social interaction, online collaboration, and online contact with staff. However, they did not show involvement in the online academic relevance dimension. Moreover, the demographic factors affected student involvement in each online SEQ dimension in online learning, including class, gender, regional origin, learning facilities, study groups, and socioeconomic status.

References

Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the Covid-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51.

Allen, I.E. and Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010. Sloan Consortium, Chicago, IL.

Andrade, M. S. (2007). Learning communities: Examining positive outcomes. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 9(1), 1-20.

Aslanian, C. B., & Clinefelter, D. L. (2012). Online college students 2012: comprehensive data on demands and preferences. The Learning House.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.

Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, 361, 379.

Burgess, O. (2015). Cyborg teaching: The transferable benefits of teaching online for the face-to-face classroom. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 112-121

Chakraborty, M., & Nafukho, F. M. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: what do students want in online courses?. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782-802.

Christensen, L. B. (2007). Experimental methodology (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Coates, H. B. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education. New York: Routledge.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452-465.

Gavala, J. R. & Flett, R. (2005). Influential Factors Moderating Academic Enjoyment/Motivation and Psychological Well-being for Maori University Students at Massey University. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(3), 52-57.

Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320-341.

Kaplan, R. M. & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2009). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues 7th ed. USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., Kuh, G. D., Umbach, P., Blaich, C., & Korkmaz, A. (2007, November). The relationship between gender and student engagement in college. Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Conference.

Lee, J. S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330-340.

Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 847-872.

Pollack, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2002). Evaluating the impact of internet teaching: Preliminary evidence from American national government classes. PS. Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 561–566.

Reschly, A. L., Pohl, A. J., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2020). Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school. New York: Springer.

Restauri, S. L., King, F. L., & Nelson, J. G. (2001). Assessment of students’ ratings for two methodologies of teaching via distance learning: An evaluative approach based on accreditation. ERIC document 460-148, reports-research (143).

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28(1), 12-23.

Wang, M.T., & Peck, S.C. (2013). Adolescent educational success and mental health vary across school engagement profiles. Developmental Psychology, 7(49) : 1266 – 1276.

Xerri, M. J., Radford, K., & Shacklock, K. (2018). Student engagement in academic activities: A social support perspective. Higher Education, 75(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0162-9.

Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in higher education, 45(2), 115-138.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-17

How to Cite

Hartati, A. D., & Batubara, M. (2023). Student Engagement Online Pada Masa Pembelajaran Daring : Analisis Dimensi dan Faktor Demografi. Jurnal Paedagogy, 10(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v10i1.6523

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1: Jurnal Paedagogy (January 2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Â