Accuracy of Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment in Learning : A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i2.9417

Keywords:

Accuracy, Self-Assessment, Peer Assessment, Learning.

Abstract

This study aims to explore the influence of self-assessment and peer assessment in learning, the factors affecting the accuracy of self-assessment and peer assessment, and efforts to enhance the accuracy of self-assessment and peer assessment. This research was a qualitative approach with a systematic literature review method. The data collected are from national and international scholarly journals related to self-assessment and peer assessment in learning, which were then analyzed using content analysis. According to the study's findings, using peer and self-evaluation to evaluate students' learning had a very beneficial effect. Thus, it should be put into practice. Additionally, a number of factors, such as self-confidence, emotional intelligence, self-perception of abilities, prior experience, feedback quality, assessment instrument clarity, assessor agreement, and trust in peer assessment, affect how accurately learners assess themselves and each other. Clear assessment criteria and procedures, which provide students direction for both their own and their peers' evaluations, can increase the accuracy of peer and self assessments. Good feedback is essential to improving both assessment techniques' accuracy. In addition, sufficient instruction for pupils is required to guarantee that evaluations are more precise, impartial, and beneficial.

Author Biography

Yohana Dwi Kristiani Sinaga, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

My name is Yohana Dwi Kristiani Sianga. I was born in Medan on January 4, 1998. I earned a bachelor's degree in mathematics education at Tanjungpura University, Pontianak in 2019. Currently. I am pursuing a masters's degree in mathematics education at Yogyakarta State University.

References

Alfallay, I. (2004). The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self- and peer-assessment. Elsevier, 32, 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.006

Aminu, N., Hamdan, M., & Russell, C. (2021). Accuracy of self-evaluation in a peer-learning environment: an analysis of a group learning model. SN Social Sciences, 1(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00152-3

Berg, I. Van Den, Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2007). Peer assessment in university teaching : evaluating seven course designs Peer assessment in university teaching : Assessment & Evaluation in Higher, 31(November 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262346

Blatchford, P. (2006). Students ’ Self Assessment of Academic Attainment : accuracy and stability from 7 to 16 years and influence of domain and social comparison group. Educational Psychology : An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, November 2014, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170308

Chatterji, S., & Mukerjee, M. (1983). Accuracy of self assessment and its relation with some psychological and biographical factors. In New Zealand Journal of Psychology (Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 28–35). http://prx.library.gatech.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1984-08159-001&site=ehost-live

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self- , Peer and Co-assessmentm Higher Education : a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(July 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935

Eva, K. W., Cunnington, J. P. W., Reiter, H. I., David, R., & Norman, G. R. (2004). How Can I Know What I Don ’ t Know ? Poor Self Assessment in a Well-Defined Domain. Advances in Health Science Education, 9, 211–224.

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059004395

Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287

Fitzgerald, J. T., White, C. B., & Gruppen, L. D. (2003). A longitudinal study of self-assessment accuracy. 645–649.

González-Betancor, S. M., Bolívar-Cruz, A., & Verano-Tacoronte, D. (2019). Self-assessment accuracy in higher education: The influence of gender and performance of university students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735604

Gordon, M. J. (1991). A Review of the Validity and Accuracy of Self-Assessment in Health Professions Traning. Academic Medicine, 66(12).

Grez, L. De, Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self-and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessment? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412441284

Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment : The students ’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(January 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776

Hoffman, L. A., Shew, R. L., Vu, T. R., Brokaw, J. J., & Frankel, R. M. (2017). The Association Between Peer and and Professionalism Lapses Among Medical Students. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 40(2), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278717702191

Jones, I., & Alcock, L. (2014). Peer assessment without assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 39(April 2015), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.821974

Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108

Jundyah, S. R. N. (2019). The Effectiveness Of Self Assessment For Classroom Learning Motivation In Children With Conduct Disorder. Jurnal Widia Ortodidaktika, 8(9), 947–958.

Lew, M. D. N., Alwis, W. A. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). Accuracy of students’ self-assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802687737

Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208097337

Miller, P. J. (2010). The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-assessment The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(October 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000066218

Nurhardini, R. (2017). Pengaruh Self dan Peer Assessment pada Materi Ekosistem Terhadap Berpikir Aplikatif dan Kritis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 5(1), 69–76.

Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2010). The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(December 2014), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000001337

Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment , peer feedback , peer review , peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186

Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teachers ’ reasons for using peer assessment : positive experience predicts use. Eur J Psychol Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5

Papinczak, T., Young, L., Groves, M., & Haynes, M. (2007). An analysis of peer , self , and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials. Medical Teacher, 29, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701294323

Ross, J. A. (2006). The Reliability , Validity , and Utility of Self-Assessment. Pratical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 11.

Soleimani, H., & Rahmanian, M. (2014). Self-, Peer-, and Teacher-Assessments in Writing Improvement : A Study of Complexity , Accuracy , and Fluency. RALs, 5(2), 128–148.

Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, Self and Tutor Assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69–75.

Suñol, J. J., Arbat, G., Pujol, J., Feliu, L., Fraguell, R. M., & Planas-lladó, A. (2015). Peer and self-assessment applied to oral presentations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, June, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1037720

Thovawira, F. A., Safitri, I., Supartik, S., Sitompul, N. N. S., & Anggriyani, I. (2021). Systematic Literature Review: Implementasi Pendekatan Stem (Manfaat Dan Tantangan) Di Indonesia. HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v4i2.682

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning : the crucial factors of design , teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2938, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698

Ward, M., Gruppen, L., & Regehr, G. (2002). Measuring Self-assessment: Current State of the Art. Advances in Health Science Education, 7, 63–80.

Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429–443.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-22

How to Cite

Sinaga, Y. D. K., Arliani, E., Ngala, J. C., & Agustina, N. L. I. T. (2024). Accuracy of Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment in Learning : A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Paedagogy, 11(2), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i2.9417

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): April

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Â