Efek Strategi Konflik Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran berbasis Model Inkuiri terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v0i0.1442Keywords:
Strategi konflik kognitif, Model inkuiri, Kemampuan Berpikir KritisAbstract
The Effects of Conflict Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry-Based Learning Model on Students' Critical Thinking Ability. Critical thinking has become a very important part of learning at all levels of education, and learning based on inquiry activities is recommended as a teaching foundation for practicing critical thinking. Generating learners' prior knowledge in inquiry activities is needed with cognitive conflict strategies, and theoretical studies show that cognitive conflict strategies can improve learners to think critically. This study aims to determine the effect of cognitive conflict strategies in scientific inquiry learning on improving the critical thinking ability of physics prospective-teacher. This research is an experimental research (weak experimental research) with the design of "one group pretest-posttest design" with a sample of 21 physics prospective-teachers at IKIP Mataram. Critical thinking ability were measured using a critical thinking ability test instrument. Data on critical thinking ability were analyzed descriptively and statistically, where homogeneity, normality, and t-test were used. The results showed that the implementation of cognitive conflict strategies in inquiry learning models had an impact on critical thinking ability of physics prospective-teacher. Descriptions of the results of further research are described in this article.References
Ambrose, S., & Lovett, M. (2014). Prior knowledge is more than content: skills and beliefs also impact learning. Applying Science of Learning in Education, 1(2), 7-19.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science and Education, 11(4), 361-375.
Bower, N. (2006). Instructional support for the teaching of critical thinking: Looking beyond the red brick walls. Journal of Scholarly Teaching-Critical Thinking, 1(1), 10-25.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children’s responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 327-343.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical text of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654.
Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5-24.
Fine, M., & Desmond, L. (2015). Inquiry-based learning: Preparing young learners for the demands of the 21st century. Educator’s Voice, VIII, 2-11.
Foster, C. (2011). A slippery slope: Resolving cognitive conflict in mechanics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 30, 216-221.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gronlund (1982). Constructing achievement test (3rd Ed). London: Prentice-Hall.
Hamlin, M., & Wisneski, D. (2012). Supporting the scientific thinking and inquiry of toddlers and preschoolers through play. Young Children, 67(3), 82-88.
Hake, R, R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision Measurement and Reasearch Methodology
Kwaku, A. G., Barker, R., Berry, C., & Brown, C. (2014). Instructional strategy lessons for educator secondary education (ISLES-S). East Carolina University.
Lee, G., Jaesool, K., Sang, P., Jung K., Hyeok, K., & Hac, P., (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603.
Lee, G., & Kwon, J. (2001). What do you know about students’ cognitive conflict in science Education: A theoretical model of cognitive process. In Proceedings of 2001 AETS Annual meeting (pp. 309-325). Costa Mesa, CA: Retrieved from http://www.rhodes.aegean.gr/ptde
Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380.
Limon, M., & Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual change and anomalous data: A case study in the domain of natural sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 213-230.
Mayer, R. (2003). Learning and instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-200.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational Beliefs as Resources for and Constraints on Conceptual Change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, dan M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33-50). Amsterdam: Pergamon
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L. & Wasis. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43-56
Prayogi S, Yuanita L & Wasis. (2017). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: Model of learning to promote critical thinking ability of pre-service teachers. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 947: 1-6
Prayogi, S. & Asy’ari, M. (2013). Implementasi model PBL (Problem Based Learning) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Prisma Sains, 1(1), 79-87.
Rodger, W. B., Joseph, A. T., April, G., Pamela, V. S., Janet, C. P., Anne, W., & Nancy L. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Report by Science Education National Institutes of Health.
Safdar, M., Shah, I., Rifat, Q., Afzal, T., Iqbal, A., Malik, R. H., & Wing, C. (2014). Pre-labs as advance organizers to facilitate meaningful learning in the physical science laboratory. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 7, 30-43.
Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868-908.
Shah, I. (2004). Making university laboratory work in chemistry more effective. Doctoral Dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University, Scotland.
Thompson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1-7.
Wasis. (2016, Maret). Higher order thinking skills (HOTS): Konsep dan implementasinya. Seminar Nasional PKPSM IKIP Mataram, Mataram
Zaman. (1996). The use of an information processing model to design and evaluate a physics undergraduate laboratory. Doctoral Dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
