Development of Critical Thinking Ability Test using the Rasch Model on Substance Pressure Materials

Authors

  • Eliza Eliza Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Tomo Djudin Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Erwina Oktavianty Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i4.5987

Keywords:

Test development, Critical Thinking, Rasch Model

Abstract

This study aims to produce an instrument to measure students' critical thinking skills on pressure equipment in class VIII SMP. The type of research used is Research and Development (R&D). The type of research used is research and development (R&D). The test instrument developed was in the form of multiple choice based on eight development steps, namely potential and problems, information gathering, product design, product validation, product revision, product testing, product revision, and final product. Validation of the instrument was developed by 3 validators, namely 2 lecturers of Physics Education at FKIP Tanjungpura University and 1 science teacher at the school. The validation given to the validator is in the form of a material validation questionnaire and question validation. The results of material expert validation data obtained 84.72%, validation obtained from content validation with an Aiken index of 0.78, included in the high category and suitable for use. The results of the data analysis of teacher and student response questionnaires obtained 92.60% and 86.26% categorized as very feasible. The results of construct validity using the Rasch model with the application of Winstep 3.73 obtained result 3, which was declared inappropriate because it did not meet the MNSQ, ZSTD, and Pt Measure Corr criteria. The reliability of the Cronbach alpha test value obtained a value of 0.73 with a fairly high category. Regarding the level of difficulty of the item, 4 question items must be discarded because they are included in the very easy and very easy categories. The overall discriminatory power is in the good category with a discriminatory index of 0.40 DP < 70. The results of the study show that out of 30 things, 23 things are appropriate to be used to measure students' critical thinking skills with good-quality items.

Author Biographies

Eliza Eliza, Universitas Tanjungpura

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika

Tomo Djudin, Universitas Tanjungpura

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika

Erwina Oktavianty, Universitas Tanjungpura

Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika

References

Abdul Aziz, A., Jusoh, M. S., Amlus, M. H., Omar, A. R., & Awang Salleh, T. S. (2014). Construct Validity: A Rasch Measurement Model Approaches. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 9(12), 7–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266676182

Ardiyanti, D. (2016). Aplikasi Model Rasch pada Pengembangan Skala Efikasi Diri dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.17801

Arifin, Z. (2017). Mengembangkan Instrumen Pengukur Critical Thinking Skills Siswa pada Pembelajaran Matematika Abad 21. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 1(2), 92–100.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 2. Bumi Aksara.

Azis, A. (2016). Analisis Tes Buatan Guru Bidang Studi Matematika Kelas V SD 1 Katobengke. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v6i01.2998

Azwar. (2015). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Baghaei, P. (2014). The Rasch Model as a Construct Validation. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 22(1).

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model : Fundamental Measurement in the HumBond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model : Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences Second Edition University of Toledo.an Sciences Second Edition University of Toledo.

Daniati, N., Handayani, D., Yogica, R., & Alberida, H. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Padang tentang Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 1(2), 1–10.

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Tes Klasik Dan Model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19.

Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. In Insight assessment (Issue ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.). https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF

Facione, P. a. (2013). Criticatal Thinking: What It Is and why It Counts. The California Academic Press.

Facione, P. a. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. The California Academic Press.

Febriano, R., Tandililing, E., & Enawaty, E. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Model Rasch Pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 10(9), 1–12. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/viewFile/49587/75676590680

Hanifah, N. (2017). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Butir Soal dan Reliabilitas Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Biasa dan Pilihan Ganda Asosiasi Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. Sosio E-KONS, 6(1).

Hartanto. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Assesmen Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V SeKolah Dasar Pada Pelajaran Tematik. Akrab Juara, 5(1), 43–54.

Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI FISIKA (PysTHOTS) PESERTA DIDIK SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120

Jamaluddin, J., Jufri, A. W., Muhlis, M., & Bachtiar, I. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran IPA di SMP. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v15i1.1296

Karim, K., & Normaya, N. (2015). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Jucama di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i1.634

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Marfhadella, P. (2021). Pengembangan Assesment Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Materi Interaksi Makhluk Hidup Dengan Lingkungan Di SMP Se-Kota Bengkulu. Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bengkulu.

Napitupulu, D. (2017). Rasch Model Analysis on Acceptance Instrument of Optical Marker for Safe Vehicle Marking. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 19, 37–48.

Novinda, M. R. R., Silitonga, H. T. M., & Hamdani. (2019). Pengembangan tes pilihan ganda menggunakan model Rasch materi gerak lurus kelas X Pontianak. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 8(6), 1–11. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/33452

Othman, N., Salleh, S. M., Hussin, H., & Wahid, H. A. (2014). Assessing Construct Validity and Reliability of Competitiveness Scale Using Rasch Model Approach. The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, 113–120.

Rahaju, E. B., Fardah, D. K., Wijayanti, P., & Ismail. (2020). Kemampuan Guru-guru Matematika SMP Kabupaten Ponorogo dalam mengembangkan soal Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 05(01), 75–81.

Ramadhan, M.A., & Iriani, T. (2013). Pembelajaran Berbasis Softkills, Sudahkah Dilakukan Guru? Paper Presented at Prosiding Semnas Politik Pendidikan Nasional: Program Pascasarjana UNY.

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama Publishing.

S Wahyuni, K. M. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Peserta didik dengan Model Rasch. In Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan.

Sabekti, A. W., & Khoirunnisa, F. (2018). Penggunaan Rasch Model Untuk Mengembangkan Instrumen Pengukuran Kemampuan Berikir Kritis Siswa Pada Topik Ikatan Kimia. Jurnal Zarah, 6(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.31629/zarah.v6i2.724

Satria Mukti, T., & Istiyono, E. (2018). Instrument for Assessing the Critical Thinking Ability of X Grade High School Students on Biology Learning. BIOEDUKASI: Jurrnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11, 105–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v11i2.21624

Solichin, M. (2017). Analisis Daya Beda Soal, Taraf Kesukaran, Validitas Butir Tes, Interpretasi Hasil Tes Dan Validitas Ramalan Dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 192–213. www.depdiknas.go.id/evaluasi-proses-

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumintono, B, & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch Pada Assesment Pendidikan. Tim Komunikata Publishing House.

Sumintono, B, & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Tim Komunikata Publishing House.

Tadeko, N., & S. (2013). Analisis Pemahaman Soal Grafik Mahasiswa Pendidikan MIPA Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1).

Widana, I. W., Adi, S., Herdiyanto, H., Abdi, J,. Marsito, M., & Istiqomah, I. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Matematika. Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.

Yani, A., Asri, A. F., & Burhan, A. (2014). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Dan Fungsi Distraktor Soal Ujian Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Produktif Di Smk Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Mesin, 1(2), 98–115.

Yulian, V. N. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Metode Inkuiri Berbantuan Software Algebrator. Jppm, 9(1), 20–24.

Zhou, Q., Huang, Q., & Tian, H. (2013). Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills by Task-Based Learning in Chemistry Experiment Teaching. Creative Education, 04(12), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412a1006.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Eliza, E., Djudin, T., & Oktavianty, E. (2022). Development of Critical Thinking Ability Test using the Rasch Model on Substance Pressure Materials. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(4), 842–855. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i4.5987

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 4: October 2022

Section

Research Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.