PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR ANTARA GAYA BERPIKIR DIVERGEN DAN KONVERGEN MATA KULIAH GELOMBANG MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN FISIKA

Authors

  • Sukainil Ahzan Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA IKIP Mataram, Indonesia
  • Syifa’ul Gummah Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FPMIPA IKIP Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v2i1.294

Keywords:

Thinking style, cognitive learning outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to determine differences in student learning outcomes between divergent and convergent thinking styles. The sample of research is the fourth semester students in the Department of Physics Education IKIP Mataram. The experimental design uses a pre-test-post-test one-group design. The data analyzed is the result of cognitive learning and questionnaire of students' thinking character. The research hypothesis was tested by using t test statistic. The result of data analysis can be concluded that there is no difference between learning achievement with convergent and divergent thinking style.

References

Alamolhodaei, Hassan. 2001. Convergent/Divergent Cognitive Styles and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia, Vol. XXIV, No. 2, p.102-117,(Online), http://www.recsam.edu.my/R&D_Journals/YEAR2001/2001Vol24No2/102-117.pdf, diakses tanggal 10 juni 2011)

Arikunto, S. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. 2010. Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Child D. and Smithers A., (1973), An attempted validation of the Joyce-Hudson scale of convergence and divergence, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, pp. 57-61.

Danili, E., & Reid, N. 2006. Cognitive factors that can potentially affect pupils’ test performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2006, 7 (2), 64-83. The Royal Society of Chemistry

De Bono, E. 1970. BerpikirLateral. Terjemahan oleh Sutoyo. 1991. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga

Guilford, J.P. 1959. Personality. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc.

Sons.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2009. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Hyerle, D., & Williams, K. 10 Juni 2011. Bifocal Assessment in the Cognitive Age: Thinking Maps for Assessing Content Learning and Cognitive Processes. The New Hampshire Journalof Education, (Online),

http://www.thinkingfoundation.org/david/books/TMapsAssessJournal.pdf, diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2011)

Kharkhurin, A.V. 2009. The Role of Billingualism in Creative Performance on Divergent Thinking and Invented Alien Creatures Tests. Journal of Creative Behavior, Volume 43 Number 1 First Quarter 2009, P. 59-71

Khery, Y. 2012. Pengaruh Strategi Problem Based Learning pada Pembelajaran Kimia Bahan Alam Terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif, Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Divergen dan Konvergen. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Negeri Malang.

Kozhevnikov, M. 2007. Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward an Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin , Vol. 133, No. 3, p. 464–481. The American Psychological Association

Messick S., (1993), The matter of style: manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching, Princeton, NJ, Educational Testing Service.

Mölle, M., Marshall, L., Wolf, B., Fehm, H.L. & Born, J. 1999. EEG Complexity And Performance Measures Of Creative Thinking. Psychophysiology, 36(1999), p. 95–104

Stanley, C. 1995. Differences in Divergent Thinking as a Function of Handedness and Sex. The American Journal of Psychology. Urbana: Fall 1995. Vol. 108, Iss. 3, p. 311

Subali, B. 2009. Pengembangan Tes Pengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen Mata Pelajaran BiologiSMA. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Biologi, Lingkungan dan Pembelajarannya, Jurdik Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 4 Juli. Hal. 581-593

Downloads

Published

2014-06-24

How to Cite

Ahzan, S., & Gummah, S. (2014). PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR ANTARA GAYA BERPIKIR DIVERGEN DAN KONVERGEN MATA KULIAH GELOMBANG MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN FISIKA. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 2(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v2i1.294

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1: June 2014

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the publishing right to the publisher.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.