Social Actor Representation in Joe Biden’s Speech about the End of Afghan War (A Critical Discourse Analysis)

Authors

  • Astri Dwi Floranti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Wawan Gunawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Yasir Mubarok Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.11013

Keywords:

Representation, War on Terror, Ideology, Multilateralism

Abstract

On August 31, 2021, Joe Biden announced officially the drawdown of the United States military forces from Afghanistan war indicating the end of the longest war in American history for 20 years. This study posits that Biden's speech serves as a means of political engagement not only as the announcement of a decision but also as the cultivation of a shared perspective and consciousness on the role and position of the United States and its allies in the Afghanistan war. This study aims at examining the representation of social actors in his speech using van Leeuwen's approach of critical discourse analysis (van Leeuwen, 2008). This study investigates the ways how the social actors are depicted in the speech and uncovers the underlying ideology behind their portrayal. According to the result, the dominance of inclusion strategies (84.1%) indicates various ways of portrayal the social actors either. The recontextualization of the Afghanistan war in the speech is constructed significantly by beliefs and attitudes of social actors within US sides. The speech expresses the role of the current president, US forces and government aiming at the shape of public opinion positively for the future of Americans and the latest national interest of United States Furthermore, this speech emphasizes the American foreign policy during Biden's administration about the multilateralism. Its implementation is proposing the diplomacy, specifically using non-military means to protect the human rights and build strong international collaboration. Biden's decision to end the Afghan war is a deliberate attempt to promote peace and stability in the United States by focusing on its future rather than dwelling on the past.

Author Biographies

Astri Dwi Floranti, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Linguistik

Wawan Gunawan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Linguistik

Yasir Mubarok, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Linguistik

References

Adjei, A. A., Ewusi-Mensah, L., & Okoh, H. (2015). Transitivity in political discourse–A study of the major process types in the 2009 state-of-the-nation address in Ghana. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 16, 23–32.

Agbo, I. I., Ngwoke, F. U., & Ijem, B. U. (2019). Transitivity Processes in President Buhari’s’ My Covenant with Nigerians’. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 7–14.

Agung, D. (2019). Perbandingan Politik Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat terhadap ISIS pada Era Pemerintahan Barack Obama dan Donald Trump (2009 - 2019). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

Ayalew Nigatu, B., & Tadesse Admassu, M. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of the second inaugural speech of Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2172805

Balog, P. S. (2019). Transitivity analysis of selected privilege speeches of Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) Volume. https://doi.org/10.59960/7.a3

Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. London.

Chossudovsky, M. (2005). America’s “War on Terrorism†(2 ed.). Global Research.

Chu, R.-X., & Huang, C.-T. (2021). The day after the apology: A critical discourse analysis of President Tsai’s national apology to Taiwan’s indigenous peoples. Discourse Studies, 23(1), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620942875

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 2, hlm. 258–284). Sage.

Featherstone, M., Holohan, S., & Poole, E. (2010). Discourses of the War on Terror: Constructions of the Islamic Other after 7/7. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 6(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1386/mcp.6.2.169_1

Guswita, K. A., & Suhardi, S. (2020). Transitivity analysis of Jokowi and Prabowo campaign speech in Indonesian presidential election. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i1.234

Hatem, M. F. (2003). Discourses on the" War on Terrorism" in the US and its Views of the Arab, Muslim, and Gendered" Other". The Arab Studies Journal, 11(2/1), 77–97.

Hendarto, Y. M. (2020, Oktober 10). Ideologi Partai di Balik Dua Kutub Pilpres AS. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/riset/2020/10/10/ideologi-partai-di-balik-dua-kutub-pilpres-as

Hodges, A., & Nilep, C. (2007). Introduction: Discourse, war and terrorism. In A. Hodges & C. Nilep (Ed.), Discourse, War and Terrorism. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hussein, I. (2016). Critical discourse analysis of the political speech of the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, at the New Suez Canal inauguration ceremony. International Journal of Language and Literature, 4(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v4n1a10

Jamil, D. U. (2014). Reading power: Muslims in the war on terror discourse. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 2(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.13169/islastudj.2.2.0029

Kedang, A. Y. (2017). Internasionalisasi dan Internalisasi Wacana War on Terror. Sospol: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 3(2), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v3i2.4883

Khan, M. H., Adnan, H. M., Kaur, S., Qazalbash, F., & Ismail, I. N. (2020). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Anti-Muslim Rhetoric in Donald Trump’s Historic 2016 AIPAC Policy Speech. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1828507

Krisnawati, E. (2021, September 10). Sejarah Peristiwa 9/11 WTC: Kronologi Serangan Teroris 11 September. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/sejarah-peristiwa-9-11-wtc-kronologi-serangan-teroris-11-september-gjjX

Liao, G., & Han, G. (2019). Ideological differences between America and China from perspectives of transitivity system—Illustrated by Trump’s and Xi Jinping’s presidential inaugural addresses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 800–806. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.16

Lisbet. (2021). Arah Kebijakan Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat di Bawah Presiden Joe Biden. Info Singkat: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual dan Strategis, 13(3), 7–12.

Matu, P. M. (2008). Transitivity as a tool for ideological analysis. Development Strategies: Struggles for Peace, Justice and Democracy, 25(1), 199–211.

Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 313–346.

Pramadya, T. P., & Rahmanhadi, A. D. (2021). A day of history and hope: A critical discourse analysis of Joe Biden’s Inauguration speech. Rainbow: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies, 10(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v10i2.45383

Renaldo, Z. A. (2021). Presupposition And Ideology: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Joe Biden’s Inaugural Speech. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(3), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p497-503

Schaffner, C. (1996). Editorial: Political Speeches and Discourse Analysis. Current Issues In Language and Society, 3(3), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529609615471

Sengul, K. (2019). Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: a case study of right-wing populist discourse in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082

Tincheva, N. (2013). Political Speeches, Text Structure, Manipulation. Journal of Education, Psychology and Social.

van Dijk, T. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Ed.), Political Linguistics (hlm. 11–52). Benjamins.

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.

van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. Dalam R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Ed.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2 ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Yulianingsih, T. (2021, September 11). 20 Tahun Tragedi WTC 11 September, Al-Qaeda Berpotensi Bangkit? Liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/global/read/4654680/headline-20-tahun-tragedi-wtc-11-september-al-qaeda-berpotensi-bangkit

Downloads

Published

2024-07-19

How to Cite

Floranti, A. D., Gunawan, W., & Mubarok, Y. (2024). Social Actor Representation in Joe Biden’s Speech about the End of Afghan War (A Critical Discourse Analysis). Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1526–1537. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.11013

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.