Analysis of Police Investigation Interviews in Defamation Cases: A Forensic Linguistics Perspective

Authors

  • Endang Sholihatin Indonesian Linguistics Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Sukirmiyadi Sukirmiyadi Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nanang Haryono Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Airlangga University, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.12064

Keywords:

Police interview, Forensic interview, Forensic linguistics, Defamation,

Abstract

Police interviews with suspects often face criticism due to distortions in the preparation of examination reports. These distortions arise from a lack of understanding of the basic linguistic principles governing oral discourse production and the differences between spoken and written language. This study addresses the following research questions: (a) What is the structure of interrogative sentences?; (b) What strategies are employed in the formulation of interrogative sentences?; (c) How are investigative interview questions classified? The objectives of this study are to elucidate: (a) the structure of interrogative sentences; (b) strategies for formulating interrogative sentences; (c) the classification of investigative interview questions. This qualitative study utilizes a case study approach. Primary data sources include interviews with five police investigators from the East Java Regional Police and secondary data from ten examination reports in defamation cases from local police departments in East Java, Indonesia. Primary data were collected using semi-structured interview techniques. The study employs an interactive model of qualitative data analysis. This research reveals: (a) clear, precise, logical, and unambiguous sentence structures that enable suspects to provide complete and structured information; (b) current strategies used by investigators in information elicitation, utilizing the SI-A-DI DE-MEN BA-BI model; (c) the classification of police investigative interview questions into broad open-ended questions and narrow open-ended questions. The application of forensic linguistics techniques in police investigative interviews contributes new insights by developing adaptive and contextual interview methods. These methods effectively and accurately elicit information related to defamation cases, promoting justice in legal processes.

Author Biographies

Endang Sholihatin, Indonesian Linguistics Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Indonesian Linguistics Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran†Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Sukirmiyadi Sukirmiyadi, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran†Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Nanang Haryono, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Airlangga University, Indonesia

References

Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). A state of high anxiety: How unsupportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 963–974.

Alsalamah, A. and Callinan, C. (2021). The kirkpatrick model for training evaluation: bibliometric analysis after 60 years (1959–2020). Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(1), 36-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-12-2020-0115

Amelia, F., Firdaus, A. Y., & Lailiyah, S. (2018). A study on the use of speech acts and the levels of trustworthiness in investigative interviews. PIONEER: Journal of Language and Literature, 10(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v10i2.248

Bachari, A. D. (2022). The elicit function of speech acts in questioning on investigative interviews in criminal inspection of dump truck theft cases at Cirebon city police station. Jomantara: Indonesian Journal of Art and Culture, Vol. 2 No. 2 July 2022. https://doi.org/10.23969/jijac.v2i2.5691

Bettens, T., Cleary, H. M. D., & Bull, R. (2024). Humane interrogation strategies are associated with confessions, cooperation, and disclosure: Evidence from a field study of incarcerated individuals in the United States. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(6), 949-969. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241232068

Benziane, I. and Zemouri, M. (2014). Knowledge management and higher education = le management de la connaissance et l’enseignement supérieur. Algerian Review of Economic Development, (1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.12816/0020023

Bergmann, A., Hall, K.C. dan Ross, S.M. (2009). Language Files: Materials for an Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Linguistic Society of America. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40492878

Bull, R. (2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 5–23.

Cheng, L., Cheng, W., & Li, J. (2016). Defamation case law in Hong Kong: A corpus-based study. Semiotica, 2016(208), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0114

Cleary, H. M. D., & Warner, T. C. (2016). Police training in interviewing and interrogation methods: A comparison of techniques used with adult and juvenile suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000175

Collins, R. E. (2013). The construction of race and crime in Canadian print media: A 30-year analysis. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813476874

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. Abingdon: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

DeClue, G. (2010). Three things that should be used to guide investigative interviews by military and intelligence agencies. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38(1-2), 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531003800111

Denzin, K. N., & Lincoln, S. Y. (2005). Qualitative research (3rd ed., Vol. 3). California: Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Dirgantara, G. (2019, Aug 7). Witness in drug case withdraws statement in BAP. Retrieved Aug 17, 2021, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/999050/saksi-kas-narkoba-cabut-kerahan-di-bap

Diepeveen, A., Svennevig, J., & Urbanik, P. (2022). Suspects’ opportunities to claim their legal rights in police investigative interviews. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.20349

Dixon, D. (2010). Questioning suspects: A comparative perspective. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(4), 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986210377107

Feldmeyer, B., Harris, C. T., & Lai, D. W. L. (2016). Language use and violence: Assessing the relationship between linguistic context and macrolevel violence. Sociological Forum, 31(2), 267-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12246

Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.

Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2006). Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In: Williamson T (ed) Investigative interviewing. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 167–189.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences.

Glesson, A. (2001). Information-seeking behavior of Scientists and their adaptation to electronic journals. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. North Carolina. https://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/2672.pdf

Halliday, M. A. K. (1995). Systemic theory. In: Concise history of the language sciences. Oxford: Pergamon, 272–276.

Haworth, K. (2015). The discursive construction of evidence in police interviews: Case study of a rape suspect. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 194-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv009

Heydon, G. (2012). Helping the police with their enquiries: Enhancing the investigative interview with linguistic research. The Police Journal, 85(2), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2012.85.2.581

Indonesia. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), LN No. 76 Tahun 1981, TLN No. 3209.

Jia, C. and Yu, Y. (2013). Using the 5w+1h model in reporting systematic literature review: a case study on software testing for cloud computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/qsic.2013.13

Jia, C., Cai, Y., Yu, Y., & Tse, T. (2016). 5w+1h pattern: a perspective of systematic mapping studies and a case study on cloud software testing. Journal of Systems and Software, 116, 206-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.058

Kassin, S. M. (2014). False confessions. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548678

Keputusan Jaksa Agung RI Nomor: KEPJA-518/A/JA/11/2001 tanggal 1 November 2001 tentang Perubahan KEPJA Nomor: 132/A/JA/11/1994 tanggal 07 November 1994 tentang Administrasi Perkara Tindak Pidana.

Kassin, S. M. (2014). False confessions. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548678

Kelly, C. E., Russano, M. B., Miller, J. C., & Redlich, A. D. (2019). On the road (to admission): Engaging suspects with minimization. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 25(3), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000199

Kelly, C. E., & Valencia, E. (2020). You ask and do not receive, because you ask wrongly. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 23(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355720955077

Komter, M. L. (2006). From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(3), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2

Liao, M. Z. (2004). Linguistic techniques in court discourse. Beijing: Legal Press.

Lidén, M., Gräns, M., & Juslin, P. (2018). The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques. Law and Human Behavior, 42(4), 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000287

Leo, J., & Liu, B. A. B. (2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1997). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Macquarie University, Australia, Working Paper. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christian_Matthiessen/publication.pdf (accessed 29 July 2020).

Manser, M. H. (1995). Oxford Learners‟s Pocket Dictionary, 2nd ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study (Vol. 2, pp. 214-253). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods.

McGurk, B. J., Carr, M. J., & McGurk, D. (1993). Investigative interviewing courses for police officers: An evaluation. Home Office Police Research Group. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi1â„410.1.1.603.4361& rep1â„4rep1&type1â„4pdf

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis, a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2006). Interviewing victims of crime, including children and people with intellectual disabilities. In: Kebell M. R. & Davies G. M. (Eds.), Practical psychology for forensic investigations and prosecutions (pp. 7–24). Chichester: Wiley.

Neuman, W. L., & Robson, K. (2014). Basics of social research. Pearson Canada, Toronto.

Newlin, C., Steele, L. C., Chamberlin, A., Anderson, J., Kenniston, J., Russell, A., Stewart, H., & Vaughan-Eden, V. (2015). Child forensic interviewing: Best practices. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, 1–20. Available at: https://www.nationalcac.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Child-Forensic-Interviewing-Best-Practices.pdf

Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language, crime and the law. London: Continuum.

Oxburgh, G. E., Myklebust, T., & Grant, T. (2010). The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(1), 46-66. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45

Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. SAGE Research Methods Foundations.

Pearse, J., & Gudjónsson, G. H. (1999). Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: A factor analytic approach. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(2), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532599167860

Pearson, M. (2017). Teaching media law in a post-truth context: Strategies for enhancing learning about the legal risks of fake news and alternative facts. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 27(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365x17704289

Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 8 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerapan Prinsip dan Standar Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20(4), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01498980

Post, R. C. (1986). The social foundations of defamation law: Reputation and the constitution. California Law Review, 74(3), 691. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480391

Regulation of the Chief of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2009 concerning the Implementation of Human Rights Principles and Standards in Carrying out the Duties of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia.

Richards, Y., McClish, M., & Keatley, D. (2023). Finding the missing: Using statement analysis to assist in missing persons cases. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 13(4), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-02-2023-0008

Shuy, R. W. (2010). The language of defamation cases. Oxford University Press

Sholihatin, E. (2019). Linguistik forensik dan kejahatan berbahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sinjaya, A., Sudarsono, S., Nurjaya, I. N., & Adi, K. (2014). The police investigator's authority to issue provision letter of investigation cancellation: Its urgency in the perspective of the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure. US-China Law Review, 11, 336–345.

Sivasubramaniam, D., & Heuer, L. (2012). Procedural justice evaluations in interrogations. In Conviction of the Innocent: Lessons From Psychological Research (pp. 79-102). https://doi.org/10.1037/13085-004

Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(6), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802201827

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work.

Sugiharto, J. (2020, 5 Juni). Kasus bom ikan, 8 saksi mencabut berkas penyidikan di pengadilan. Tempo. https://metro.tempo.co/read/1349869/kas-bom-ikan-8-saksi-cabut-bap-menyidikan-di-pengadilan

Sumampouw, N. E. J., Otgaar, H., Rooy, D. L. V., & Ruiter, C. d. (2019). The quality of forensic child interviewing in child sexual abuse cases in Indonesia. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35(2), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09342-5

Sukumar, D., Hodgson, J., & Wade, K. A. (2016). How the timing of police evidence disclosure impacts custodial legal advice. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 20(3), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712716643548

Tan, K. H., Abdollahi-Guilani, M., & Chen, C. (2017). Linguistic deception of Chinese cyber fraudsters. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(3), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2017-2303-08

Teoh, Y. S., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Interviewer demeanor in forensic interviews of children. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(2), 145–159.

Van Charldorp, T. C. (2011). The coordination of talk and typing in police interrogations. CLIC, 8(1), 61–92. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2h1110cs

Van Charldorp, T. C. (2014). “What happened?†From talk to text in police interrogations. Language & Communication, 36, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.01.002

Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3

Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2014). Eliciting information and detecting lies in intelligence interviewing: An overview of recent research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 936–944.

Walsh, D., & Oxburgh, G. E. (2008). Investigative interviewing of suspects: Historical and contemporary developments in research. Forensic Update, 92, Winter 2007/8 (Feb 08), 41–45.

Yang, Y., Moody, S. A., Cabell, J. J., & Madon, S. (2019). Why suspects confess: The power of outcome certainty. Law and Human Behavior, 43(5), 468-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000350

Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41-47.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Zeng, F., Huang, C. Y., & Bull, R. (2021). Police interviews of suspects in China: Developments and analyses. Sage - Crime and Justice

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-07-19

How to Cite

Sholihatin, E., Sukirmiyadi, S., & Haryono, N. (2024). Analysis of Police Investigation Interviews in Defamation Cases: A Forensic Linguistics Perspective. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1137–1154. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.12064

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.