Language Preference of Bilingual Preschool Children in Articulating Word-Object Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v7i1.1333Keywords:
bilingual, acquisition, language preferenceAbstract
This study attempts to focus on one factor of bilingual acquisition and language differentiation by exploring bilingual preschoolers’ language preference in articulating word-object relationships using concentrated descriptive and associative questions. Ten bilingual preschool children from the middle class families participated in the study. Pre-testing phase was conducted before the actual testing phase and the preschool teachers were consulted to confirm the data collection. These observations on general language bias as well as preferences developed by the males and females participants may have significant implications for language teaching that teachers shall carefully deliberate the kind of classroom culture they would like their learners to experience because strong language bias could possibly develop in language prejudice that may obstruct healthy bilingual development.
References
Baldwin, D.A. & Markman, E.M. (Apr., 1989). Establishing word-object relations: A first step. Child Development, 60 (2), 381-398.
Capone, N.C. & McGregor, K.K. (Dec., 2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers’ word retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48 (6), 1468-1480.
Clark, E.V. (2009). First language acquisition (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Genesee, F. (2006). Bilingual first language acquisition in perspective. In L. Wei (Series Ed.) & P. McCardle and E. Hoff (Vol. Eds.), Child language and child development, Vol. 7. Childhood bilingualism: Research on infancy through school age, 45 – 67. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Gleason, J, B. (1993). The development of language (3rd ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Hall, D.G. & Graham, S. A. (1999). Lexical Form Class Information Guides Word-to-Object Mapping in Preschoolers: Child development, 70 (1), 78-91.
Hoff, E. (2009). Language development (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1997). Language development. California:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Koschmann, T. (2005). Word and thought: Interpretative procedures, cultural learning, and semantic analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14 (2), 281-294.
Landau, B., Smith, L.B. & Jones, S.S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
Markman, E. M. & Hutchinson, A. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word leanings: Taxonomic vs. thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27.
McLaughlin, B. (1984). Second-Language acquisition in childhood vol 2: School-Age children. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
McMurray, B., Horst, J. S., Toscano, J., & Samuelson, L. K. (2009). Connectionist learning and dynamic processing: Symbiotic developmental mechanisms. In J. P. Spencer, M.S. Thomas & J.L. McClelland (Eds.), Towards a new grand theory of development? Connectionism and dynamic systems theory reconsidered 8 (2) 218-249.
Merriman, W. E., & Bowman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children’s word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54(3–4),
Rosenblum, T. & Pinker, S.A. (Jun., 1983). Word magic revisited: Monolingual and bilingual children's understanding of the word-object relationship. Child Development, 54, (3), 773-780.
Sabbagh, M.A., & Baldwin, D.A. (Jul.-Aug., 2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers' theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72 (4), 1054-1070.
Wilkinson, K.M. & Mazzitelli, K. (2003). The effect of ‘missing’ information on children’s retention of fast-mapped labels. Journal of Child Language, 30, 47-63.
Woodward, A.L. & Hoyne, K.L. (Jan.-Feb., 1999). Infants' learning about words and sounds in relation to objects. Child Development, 70 (1), 65-77.
Yule, G. (2006). The study of language (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.