Enhancing English Grammar Mastery through Gamification: The Impact of Scrambled Games on Secondary School Students' Writing Skills

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i2.14440

Keywords:

Gamification, Grammar mastery, Scrambled Games, Secondary school, Writing skills

Abstract

Grammar mastery is a fundamental component of language proficiency, yet many EFL students struggle with learning grammar through conventional methods, which are often perceived as monotonous and ineffective. Gamification has emerged as a promising instructional strategy to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. This study investigates the effectiveness of Scrambled Games in improving grammar mastery among 11th-grade students at SMAN 1 Depok, particularly in hortatory exposition writing. A Classroom Action Research (CAR) design was employed, as it allows for iterative implementation and direct observation of students’ progress in a real classroom setting. The study involved 33 students, with data collected through pre-tests, post-tests, and classroom observations. Statistical analysis using paired sample t-tests revealed a significant improvement in student performance, with the mean pre-test score increasing from 61.49 to 73.15 post-intervention (p < 0.05). Monitoring protocol results indicated moderate to high engagement levels, with notable gains in problem-solving, active participation, and grammatical accuracy. The findings suggest that Scrambled Games can serve as an effective alternative to traditional grammar instruction, fostering active learning and student motivation. However, implementation challenges, such as varying proficiency levels and time constraints, highlight the need for differentiated instruction and supplementary digital resources. These results underscore the potential of game-based learning in enhancing EFL instruction, providing educators with a dynamic approach to teaching grammar. Future research should explore long-term effects, digital adaptations, and variations in game design to optimize its impact on language learning.

Author Biographies

Safhira Fauzia Ramadhanti, Yogyakarta State University

English Language Education, Faculty of Language, Arts, and Culture, Yogyakarta State University, DIY Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Dwiyani Pratiwi, Yogyakarta State University

English Language Education, Faculty of Language, Arts, and Culture, Yogyakarta State University, DIY Yogyakarta, Indonesia

References

Abdukarimova, N. A., & Zubaydova, N. N. (2021). Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Teaching Grammar. Proceedings of International Scientific-Practical Conference on “Cognitive Research in Education,†372–376.

Al-Khresheh, M. H., & Orak, S. D. (2021). The Place of Grammar Instruction in the 21st Century: Exploring Global Perspectives of English Teachers towards the Role of Teaching Grammar in EFL/ESL Classrooms. World Journal of English Language, 11(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V11N1P9

Anand, M. S., Subramanian, M., & Selvam, J. (2019). Strategies in Teaching English Grammar. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 10(4), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.10.4.2019.028

Asifayanti, Weda, S., & Abduh, A. (2021). Exploring Teachers’ Perception on Gamification in Online Grammar Teaching. Journal of Art, Humanity & Social Studies, 1(4), 1–11.

Dewi, V. S., Herawati, A., & Vonti, L. H. (2022). The Use of Scrambled Word Game on Students’ Vocabulary. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics Studies (JET Li), 4(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.55215/jetli.v4i1.5149

Dita, A., & Zaki, L. B. (2022). The Effects of Scramble Game in Improving Students Vocabulary at Secondary Students of Muhammadiyah Plus Batam. International Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v2i1.156

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2011). An Introduction to Language. In Wadsworth Cengage Learning (Ninth). https://doi.org/10.3406/rfea.1996.1625

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (Tenth). Pearson.

Góral, A., Jałocha, B., Mazurkiewicz, G., & Zawadzki, M. (2021). Action Research: A Handbook for Students (E. Bogacz-Wojtanowska & W. Karna (eds.)). Instytut Spraw Publicznych.

Handayani, N. D., & Johan, M. (2018). Correlation Between Problem Faced in Grammar and Writing Ability of EFL University Students. Journal of English Education, 4(2), 108–120.

Hashim, H., Rafiqah M. Rafiq, K., & Md. Yunus, M. (2019). Improving ESL Learners’ Grammar with Gamified-Learning. Arab World English Journal, 5, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.4

Helmiati, M., Sudarsono, & Susilawati, E. (2019). The correlation of grammar mastery with writing ability. 1–8.

Hewings, A., & Hewings, M. (2005). Grammar and Context: An Advanced Resource Book. In Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv1bxgwts.31

Jamhuri, J., & Said, M. (2021). The Effects of Vocabulary and Grammar Mastery on Students’ Writing Skill in Recount Text. INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.30998/inference.v4i2.6098

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. In Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.

Khairunnisah. (2018). Improving Students’ Tenses Mastery through Tenses Symbol Technique (TST) in Class X4 at SMA Negeri 1 Pekanbaru. Journal of English for Academic, 5, 33–48.

Kholili, A. (2023). Investigating Factors Underlying Boredom in Learning English: The Case of Secondary School. Al-Lisan: Jurnal Bahasa (Online), 8(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v8i1.3185

Krisbiantoro, B. (2020). The effectiveness of gamification to enhance students’ mastery on tenses viewed from students’ creativity. Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.30659/jamr.1.2.73-97

Le, N. T. T. (2020). Learning Grammar in the Context of Writing: A Case Study on Students’ Beliefs. Viettesol International Convention 2020: Innovation and Globalization, 47–62.

Liamkina, O., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01333_1.x

Mansur, M., & Fadhilawati, D. (2021). Enhancing the Students’ Grammar Achievements of Conditional Sentences by Using Quizizz Platform in Senior High School. JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences), 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35457/jares.v6i2.1633

Mihran. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Team Games Tournament (TGT) terhadap Peningkatan Keterampilan Belajar Permainan Bola Voli pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP 02 Kota Bima. In Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Keohlaragaan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Mirzayeva, Z. A. qizi, & Kobiljanovna, S. M. (2021). The Significance of Teaching Independent Learning and Its Benefits for Students. NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS: JournalNX- A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(3), 354–358.

Muhsin, M. A. (2015). The Correlation Between Students’ Grammar Knowledge and Writing Ability. 1–15.

Mukhoiyaroh, Isnainiyah, L., Budiarti, S., Pratiwi, E., & Fahriani, I. (2020a). The Use of Scramble Word Game to Develop Students Competence in Pronoun at MTsN 3 Sidoarjo. International Conference on English Language Teaching, 434(ICONELT 2019), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200427.038

Mukhoiyaroh, Isnainiyah, L., Budiarti, S., Pratiwi, E., & Fahriani, I. (2020b). The Use of Scramble Word Game to Develop Students Competence in Pronoun at MTsN 3 Sidoarjo. International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT), 434(ICONELT 2019), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200427.038

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. In Language (Vol. 57, Issue 3). The McGraw-Hill Companies.

O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Grammarly: Help or hindrance? Academic Learning Advisors’ perceptions of an online grammar checker. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 13(1), A88–A107. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/591

Oranga, J., & Gisore, B. (2023). Action Research in Education. Open Access Library Journal, 10(07), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110306

Putra, I. N. J. A., Dharmayanti, P. A. P., & Sawitri, N. L. P. D. (2022). The Correlation Between Grammar Mastery and Writing Skill of the Tenth Grade Student of SMK Ratna Wartha Ubud in Academic Year 2021/2022. Academic Journal on English Studies, 2(2), 101–106.

Rizoqulovna, N. D. (2023). Learning English as a Second Language: Challenges and Strategies. International Scientific Journal, 2(9), 165–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8356219

Sadhasivam, S., Michael, M. V. P., Mohamad, M., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). The Importance of Innovative Teaching and Learning Approaches in the Implementation of CEFR: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(2), 1817–1828. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/16842

Sakdiyah, I. H., Maolida, E. H., & Nurviyani, V. (2024). Utilizing Game-Based Learning Baamboozle in Developing Students’ English Grammar Mastery. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 8(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v8i1.12755

Saragih, C. S., Tampubolon, S., & Silitonga, H. (2023). The Effect of Scramble Game by Using Quiziz Application on Students Vocabulary Mastery at SMP Gajah Mada Medan. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 6925–6929.

Sepúlveda, S. I. D. (2017). Discourse Analysis in Small Doses: Meaningful Activities in the ELT Classroom. MEXTESOL Journal, 41(2), 1–7.

Shirav, A., & Nagai, E. (2022). The Effects of Deductive and Inductive Grammar Instructions in Communicative Teaching. English Language Teaching, 15(6), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n6p102

Sorohiti, M., & Aini, E. N. (2021). Grammar Teaching Materials: What Makes Them Interesting? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020-Social, Humanity, and Education, 518(ICoSIHESS 2020), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.135

Tang, M. M., & Nurkidam, A. (2021). The Use of Scramble Game in Improving Students’ Grammar Achievement. Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching Studies (LETS), 73–80.

Yawijaya, R. A., Jamil, S., & Fauziah, R. (2023). The Effect of Scramble Game in Learning English Vocabulary at MAN 1 Aceh Tenggara Academic Year 2021-2022. Tuwah Pande: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.55606/tuwahpande.v2i1.209

Yudha, H. T., & Mandasari, B. (2021). The Analysis of Game Usage for Senior High School Students to Improve Their Vocabulary Mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JELTL), 2(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v2i2.1329

Yusob, K. F. (2018). Challenges of Teaching Grammar at Tertiary Level: Learning from English Lecturers’ Insights. E-Academia Journal, 7(1), 149–158.

Zahraa, S. A., Putra, H. D., Elfa, F., & Satria, A. (2023). Improving Students’ Grammar Mastery of Noun Clauses by Using Teacher’s Correction Technique. ELT-Lectura: Studies and Perspectives in English Language Teaching, 10(2), 115–122. http://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/ELT-Lectura/article/view/13565/5345

Downloads

Published

2025-04-19

How to Cite

Ramadhanti, S. F., & Pratiwi, D. (2025). Enhancing English Grammar Mastery through Gamification: The Impact of Scrambled Games on Secondary School Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(2), 900–911. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i2.14440

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.