Analyzing Implicatures in Taliwang Dialect

Authors

  • Ismiati Ismiati Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Cordova University, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4215

Keywords:

Implicature, Taliwang Dialect

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the types of implicature and flouting maxims and the reasons for doing the flouting in Taliwang Dialect. It applied the descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Data was collected by recording natural conversations among the natives of Taliwang Dialect. It was found two types of implicature, namely, Generalized Conversational Implicature (GCI) and Particularized Conversational Implicatures (PCI). In GCI, the speaker and interlocutor could easily understand the conveyed utterances because they mostly used general statements which are commonly spoken in the Taliwang dialect. In PCI, both speaker and the interlocutor needed a particular knowledge to understand each other because of the flouting maxim. Some speakers or hearers in PCI often break the maxim in a conversation due to some reasons such as accepting untrue or lie information, receiving more information than the needed information, getting irrelevant information and having unclear or ambiguous information.

Author Biography

Ismiati Ismiati, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Cordova University, Indonesia

English Lecturer, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education,Cordova University, Indonesia

References

Alhasibunur, A. (2018). The Analysis of Morphological Process of Students' English Utterances. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 4(2), 47-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v4i2.316

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur PenelitianSuatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2009). Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1989). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Chan, J. Y. H. (2019). The choice of English pronunciation goals: different views, experiences and concerns of students, teachers and professionals. Asian Englishes, 21(3), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1482436

Fahmi, R. (2018). An Analysis of Grice’s Maxims Violation in Daily Conversation. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 4(2), 91-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v4i2.325

Gargesh, R., & Sharma, A. (2019). Indian English in political discussions. World Englishes, 38(1–2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12394

Grice. H. P. (1967). William James Lecture Series. Boston: Harvard University

Press.

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Grundy, P. (2000). Doing Pragmatics. London: Hodder Arnold Publication.

Hadiyanto, T., & Makinuddin. (2006). Analisis Sosial. Bandung: Yayasan Akatiga.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, J. S. (2020). Digital communication, social media, and Englishes. World Englishes, 39(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12447

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Mahsun. (1994). Penelitian Dialek Geografi Bahasa Sumbawa Yogyakarta: Tesis S3 Universitas Gadjah Mada.

McConachy, T., & Hata, K. (2013). Addressing textbook representations of pragmatics and culture. ELT Journal, 67(3), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct017

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publishers.

Paltridge, B. (2000). Making Sense Of Discourse Analysis. Queensland: Gerd Stabler.

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse Analysis.: An Introduction. London & New York: Continuum.

Saragi, Y.M. (2011). Flouting Maxims in Conversational Implicature in the Ellen Degenerates Talk Show. Surabaya: State University of Surabaya.

Searle, R. J. (1975). Speech Acts and Recent Linguictics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational Style: Analysisn Talk Among Friends. New Jersey: Alex Publishing Corporation Norwood.

Yule, G. (2006). The Study of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-25

How to Cite

Ismiati, I. (2021). Analyzing Implicatures in Taliwang Dialect. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4215

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.