Breadth and Depth-Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in an English First Additional Language Context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4827

Keywords:

Vocabulary Breadth, Vocabulary Depth, Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Knowledge, English First Additional Language

Abstract

Most research has been concerned predominantly with vocabulary breadth in comparison with vocabulary depth. This study aims to bridge this gap by answering the following question: How do scores on vocabulary size, depth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension correlate with each other? This study used quantitative method research on grade 11 English First Additional Language (EFAL) learners. Only 30 participants took part in the study. The independent variables used are the Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) and Word Associate Test (WAT). Then, the dependent variable Reading comprehension is the dependent variable. The results indicated that 81% of the variance in the breadth of vocabulary scores which was measured through the VLT was shared with reading comprehension scores obtained in a reading comprehension test out of 30. On the other side, 90% of the variance in depth of vocabulary knowledge scores measured through a WAT was shared with reading comprehension scores. However, the depth of vocabulary scores could improve the prediction of the reading comprehension scores over and above the estimation accomplished by the vocabulary breadth scores. The results demonstrated the need for teachers to know their learners’ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension abilities. 

References

Alfaki, M.I. (2015). Vocabulary input in language teaching: assessing the vocabulary load in spine five. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 3(1), 1-14.

Baki, R.B. (2013). The impact of vocabulary knowledge level on EFL Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 29(1), 85-89.

Choi, Hye-Yeon. (2013). Effects of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge On English Reading Comprehension Among Korean High School Students. Language Research, 49(2), 419-452.

Daller, H,J., Milton., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). In H. Daller, Davoudi M and Chavosh M 2016. The effect of explicit teaching of lexical inferencing strategies on the vocabulary learning among Iranian Field-dependent and independent EFL learners. Studies in Literature and Language, 12(4), 44-53.

Henriksen, B. (1999). Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-317.

Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kang Y,H.S., Kang., &Park. J. (2012). Is it vocabulary breadth or depth that better predict Korean EFL learner´s reading comprehension? English Teaching, 67(4), 149-171.

Laufer, B. (2010). Lexical Threshold Revisited: Lexical Text coverage Learners’ Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15-30.

Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G.C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15-30.

Malvern, D,B., Richards, P., &Milton. (2008). Introduction: special issue on knowledge and use of the lexicon in French as a second language. French Language Studies, 18, 269-276

Matsuoka, W., & Hirsh, D. (2010). Vocabulary learning through reading: Does an ELT course book provide good opportunities? Reading in a foreign language, 22(1), 56-70.

McNamara, D.S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1-30.

Meara, P. (1995). Single-subject studies of lexical acquisition. Second Language Research, 11,1- 3.

Meara, P. (2005). Designing vocabulary tests for English, Spanish, and other languages. In C. Butler, M.A. Gomez Gonzalez & S. Doval Suarez (Eds.), The dynamics of language use: Functional and contrastive perspectives (pp. 271285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge. Multilingual Matters.

Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills James Milton Swansea University. Eurosla Monographs Series 2. L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge, and use, 57-78

Nation I.S.P. (2006). How a large vocabulary size is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.

Nation, P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: CUP.

Pasquarella, A., Gottardo, A., & Grant, A. (2012). Comparing factors related to reading comprehension in adolescents who speak English as a first (L1)or second (L2) language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 1-29.

Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook. (pp.227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.

Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, (18):1-28.

Qian, D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282-308.

Qian, D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, (52), 513-536.

Qin, C. (2015). Didactic considerations of vocabulary breadth and depth in EFL/ESL contexts - a literature review.

Rashidi, N., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108.

Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355-371.

Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In Bogaards, P & B Laufer (Eds), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 209-227.

Schellings, G., Aarnnoutse, C., &Leewe, J.V. (2006). Third-grader's think-aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 549-568.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329-363.

Schmitt, N.D., Schmitt, C., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88.

Gyllstad, H. (2011). Looking at L2 vocabulary knowledge dimensions from an assessment perspective- challenges and potential solutions. Eurosla Monographs Series, (2):11-28.

Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407-423.

Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics 22, 217-234.

www.testpreppractice.net/TOEFL/Cambridge- toefl.html

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-22

How to Cite

Zano, K. (2022). Breadth and Depth-Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension in an English First Additional Language Context. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4827

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.