Pedagogical Practices in Teaching SiSwati as a First Language in Diverse Linguistic Settings

Authors

  • Tholakele Constance Mngometulu Department of Languages, Ngwane Teachers College, Eswatini, South Africa
  • Connie Makgabo Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6567

Keywords:

First language, pedagogical practices, socio-cultural theory, social practice,

Abstract

This article reports on pedagogical practices in teaching SiSwati as a first language (SL1) in diverse linguistic settings of Eswatini. In response to educational research indicating the vital role played by a learner’s first language in learning, the Eswatini government embarked on an exercise of decolonising the curriculum in 2011 by using SiSwati as the medium of instruction and learning in the foundation and middle phases and a core subject throughout primary and senior secondary school. However, arguably, research on African language pedagogy is scanty, let alone teaching of SiSwati, as the little available research has been on issues of policy, thus leaving a knowledge gap on the pedagogy in SiSwati first language (SL1). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore pedagogical practices that are used in the SL1 class in compliance with the policy, which provides for SiSwati to be a compulsory subject and a vehicle for teaching and learning in early primary schools.. This qualitative case study involved eight teachers who taught SL1 in the foundation and middle phases. Data were generated through interviews. The findings indicated that teachers’ practices were anchored in the understanding that teaching SL1 meant equipping learners with functional language skills, such as productive and receptive skills, essential for studying across subject curricula. However,  a lack of pedagogical knowledge thwarted teachers’ practices to teach language in general, let alone to multilingual learners as expository pedagogy dominated SL1 classrooms, as opposed to curriculum requirements that learner-centred pedagogies anchored in social practice be used. Besides, these findings advocate for culturally responsive pedagogies appropriate to teach SL1 to learners from diverse linguistic backgrounds.

Author Biographies

Tholakele Constance Mngometulu, Department of Languages, Ngwane Teachers College, Eswatini

SiSwati lecturer, Department of Languages,Ngwane Teachers College, Eswatini

Connie Makgabo, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

References

Amaechi, A. (2017). Indigenous language implementation and nation building: The Nigerian Experience. UJAH: Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities, 18(1), 168-199.

Bailey, E.G. & Marsden, E. (2017). Teachers’ views on recognising and using home languages in predominantly monolingual primary schools, Language and Education, 31(4):283-306, DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2017.1295981.

Bamgbose, A. (2011). African Language Today: The Challenge of and Prospects for Empowerment under Globalization. Selected Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed.

Barone, D.M. & Mallette, M.H. (2013). Best Practices in Early literacy instruction. London: The Guilford Press.

Baser, D., Kopcha, T.J. & Ozden, M.Y. (2015). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for pre-service teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4):749-764. Doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456.

Boulton, A. & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A metaâ€analysis. Language Learning, 67(2):348-393. doi:10.1111/lang.12224.

Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning And Teaching. New York: Longman.

Chambers, A. (2019). Towards the corpus revolution? Bridging the research–practice gap. Language Teaching, 52(4):460-475. DOI:10.1017/S0261444819000089.

Cheng, W.W. (2015). A case study of action research on communicative language teaching. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 18(6):705-717, DOI: 10.1080/09720502.2015.1108075.

Cummins, J. (2005). A Proposal for Action: Strategies for Recognising Heritage Language Competence as a Learning Resource within the Mainstream Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4):585-591.

De Vos, M.K., Van der Merwe. & Van der Mescht, C. (2014). A linguistic research programme for reading in African languages to underpin CAPS. Journal for Language Teaching, 48, 143-177.

Dewey, J. (2018). Democracy and Education by John Dewey: With a Critical Introduction by Patricia H. Hinchey, Myers Education Press, Bloomfield. Available from: ProQuest Ebook Central. [Accessed: 2022 July 12].

Dooly, M. & Vallejo, C. (2020). Bringing plurilingualism into teaching practice: a quixotic quest? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(1):81-97, DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2019.1598933.

EMoET. (2018). Eswatini National Curriculum Framework for General Education. Mbabane: Government of Eswatini.

EMoET. (2011). The Swaziland Education and Training Sector Policy. Mbabane: Swaziland. Mbabane: Eswatini.

EMoET. (2017). Selected Circulars, Academic year 2017. Government of Eswatini: Mbabane.

Hannaway, D.M. & Steyn, M.G. (2017). Teachers’ experiences of technology-based teaching and learning in the Foundation Phase. Early Child Development and Care, 187(11):1745-1759.

Hedge, H. & Cullen, J. (2012). Participatory learning theories: a framework for early childhood pedagogy, Early Child Development and Care, 182(7):921-940, DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2011.597504.

Ikome, L.B. (2019). Using Afaan Oromoo as primary language of learning and teaching in selected schools in Addis Ababa: Policy, problems and strategies. Doctoral thesis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

Joubert, I. (2015). Literacy in the Foundation Phase (2nd Ed.) Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Kalina, C. & Powell, K.C. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2):241-250.

Lantolf, J.P., Thorne, S.L. & Poehner, M.E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B, Van Petten & J, Williams Ed, J Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, (pp.207-226). New York: Routledge.

Leach, J. & Moon, B. (2008). The Power of Pedagogy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Li, W. (2018). “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.†Applied Linguistics 39 (1): 9–30.

Khanahmadi, F. & Sarkhosh, M. (2018). Teacher-vs. Peer-mediated Learning of Grammar through Dynamic Assessment: A Sociocultural Perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4):207-222.

Ma, Q., Tang, J. & Lin, S. (2021). The development of corpus-based language pedagogy for TESOL teachers: a two-step training approach facilitated by online collaboration. Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1895225

Macdonald, C.A. (2002). Are children still swimming up the waterfall? A look at literacy development in the new curriculum. Language Matters, 33, 111-141.

Mati, X. (2004). Using code switching as a strategy for bilingual education in the classroom. Paper delivered at the 21st annual AEAA Conference, 25-28 August 2004. Retrieved from Google scholar. [Accessed: 29/09/2021].

Mbele, S.A. (2019). Educators’ knowledge of teaching isiZulu within Ugu cluster. Master’s Dissertation. KwaZulu Natal: University of KwaZulu Natal.

Milner, H.R.IV. (2017). Race, Talk, Opportunity Gaps, and Curriculum Shifts in (Teacher) Education. Literacy Research. Theory, Method, and Practice, 66, 73-94 sage. DOI: 10.1177/2381336917718804.

Milner, H.R.I.V. (2012). Beyond a Test Score: Explaining Opportunity Gaps in Educational Practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6):693-718. Sage Publications, Inc. Accessed: 22-03-2020.

Mkhwanazi, H.N. (2014). Teachers’ use of formative assessment in the teaching of reading Comprehension in Grade 3. Doctoral thesis. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.

Mokibelo, E. (2016). Transition from Setswana to English: A Policy Dilemma. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 665-674, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.05.

Nkosi, Z.P. (2011). An exploration into the pedagogy of teaching reading in selected foundation phase isiZulu home language classes in Umlazi schools. PhD dissertation: University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Pachler, N., Evans, M. & Lawes, S. (2007). Modern Foreign Languages: Teaching School subjects. Oxford: Routledge.

Ramdan, S. (2015). Exploring literacy practices: A case study of a peri-urban primary school in the Pinetown district; Kwa-Zulu Natal. Doctoral Thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.

Richards, H.V., Brown, A.F. & Forde, T.B. (2007). Addressing Diversity in Schools: Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(3):64–68. doi: 10.1177/004005990703900310. Available at: -ebscohost- (Accessed: 13 July 2022).

Schaffler, D., Nel, M. & Booysen, R. (2021). Exploring South African Foundation Phase teachers’ understanding, skills and training needs in the teaching of phonological awareness. The Language Learning Journal, 49(5):554-567, DOI:10.1080/09571736.2019.1655585.

Schaffler, D. (2015). A support programme for foundation phase English second language educators to improve the teaching of phonological awareness. Unpublished doctoral thesis, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark.

Shangguan, C., Gong, S., Guo, Y., Wang, X. & Lu, J. (2020). The effects of emotional design on middle school students’ multimedia learning: the role of learners’ prior knowledge, Educational Psychology, 40(9):1076-1093, DOI:10.1080/01443410.2020.1714548.

Sheets, R.H. (2009). What is Diversity Pedagogy? Multicultural Education, 16(3), 11-17. Available, Ebscohost.

Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1):1-22.

Stauffer, B. (2020). What are 21st Century skills? Applied Educational Systems. [Accessed 2020 April 20].

UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

UNESCO. (2010). Why and how Africa should invest in African languages and multilingual education: An evidence and practice-based policy advocacy brief. Germany: Institute for Lifelong Learning.

Van Viegen, S., & Zappa-Hollman, S. (2019). Plurilingual pedagogies at the post-secondary level: possibilities for intentional engagement with students’ diverse linguistic repertoires, Language, Culture and Curriculum, Taylor & Francis group, Routledge, 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2019.1686512.

Vygotsky, LS. (1986). Thought and language. In A. Kozulin (Ed.), Vygotsky in context (pp. 11–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher: psychological processes. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Waring, M. & Evans, C. (2014). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.uplib.idm.oclc.org.

Whong, M. (2013). A linguistic perspective on communicative language teaching. The Language Learning Journal, 41(1), 115-128, doi: 10.1080/09571736.2011.625097.

Zano, K. (2022). A Multilingual Turn: Translanguaging by Design Activity in an EFL Context, JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), pp. 199-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v%vi%i.4826.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-01-20

How to Cite

Mngometulu, T. C., & Makgabo, C. (2023). Pedagogical Practices in Teaching SiSwati as a First Language in Diverse Linguistic Settings. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6567

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.