Task-Supported EFL Instruction: Integrating Students, Teacher, and Textbook Roles in a Japanese Mainstream High School Class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i2.7019Keywords:
Classroom-based research, Mixed methods study, Sociocultural approach, High school EFL, JapanAbstract
Today in Japan, the impetus to effect positive change on students’ use of English as a communication tool is reflected in the thrust of the Ministry of Education to promote meaningful in-class practice as highlighted in the revised high school foreign language curriculum. However, teachers face a dilemma of implementing meaningful classroom practice of English entirely without any focus on grammar or form. Fortunately, an approach which may offer a balanced opportunity to create meaningful practice while highlighting the target expression in use is Task-supported language teaching (TSLT). To better understand TSLT’s usefulness in an EFL setting, this classroom-based research explores the potential roles that students, the teacher, and the textbook play in a sociocultural approach-oriented EFL class employing TLST and how it complements a Japanese mainstream high school class. Utilizing mixed methods of sociocultural discourse analysis and self-reporting of Grade 11 (n=117) mainstream EFL learners, results indicate that: the students, talking in pairs using their L1, (1) understood difficult vocabulary, (2) managed assigned tasks, and (3) engaged in off-task dialogue; the teacher performed the roles of (1) classroom manager, (2) communicator of content, and (3) assessor and provider of feedback; and the textbook played (1) informative, (2) instructional, and (3) experiential roles in the classroom. It was also found that TLST complements a Japanese high school mainstream EFL class by (1) optimizing the limited time offered in class for students to tackle the TL; (2) aiding students in their standardized institutional exams; and (3) appealing to Japanese cultural sensibilities.
References
Aoyama, R. (2020). Exploring Japanese high school students’ L1 use in translanguaging in the communicative EFL classroom. TESL-EJ, 23(4), 1—18. https://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume23/ej92/ej92a12/
Aoyama, R. & Denton, L. (2020). Language choice of Japanese high school students in intra-national communication: Critical reflection on language use and users in Japan. KATE Journal, 34, 73—85. https://doi.org/10.20806/katejournal.34.0_73
Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595—608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.003
Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33, 209—224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006
Ellis, R. (2018). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 1—22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765315
Freeman, D., Katz, A., Gomez, P. G., & Burns, A. (2015). English-for-Teaching: Rethinking teacher proficiency in the classroom. ELT Journal, 69(2), 129—139. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu074
Garcia Mayo, M. & Hidalgo, M. (2017). L1 use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System, 1—14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.05.004
Glasgow, G. P. & Paller, D. L. (2014). MEXT-approved EFL textbooks and the new Course of Study. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings (113—121). JALT. https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/jalt2013_012.pdf
Greer, D. (2000). “The eyes of hitoâ€: A Japanese cultural monitor of behavior in the communicative language classroom. JALT Journal, 22(1), 183—195. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ22.1-9
Hung, N. V. (2012). Mother tongue use in task-based language teaching model. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 23—30. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n8p23
Ito, H. (writer) (2009). New one world: Expressions II. (Revised ed.) Teacher’s Book. Kyoiku Shuppan.
Kellem, H. (2009). Principles for developing oral fluency in the classroom. The Language Teacher, 33(1), 9—11. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/33.1_art2.pdf
Kotaka, M. (2013). Task-based language teaching (TBLT) and the Japanese English Classroom. Tsuru University Graduate School Bulletin, 17, 47—70. http://trail.tsuru.ac.jp/dspace/handle/trair/629
Krashen, S. (2009). The comprehension hypothesis extended. In T. Piske and M. Young-Scholten (eds.). Input Matters in SLA, 81—94. Multilingual Matters. http://sdkrashen.com/content/articles/comprehension_hypothesis_extended.pdf
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243—249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004363
Marcos Miguel, N. (2015). Textbook consumption in the classroom: Analyzing a classroom Corpus. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 309—319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.449
Marsden, E. & Hawkes, R. (2023). Situating practice in a limited-exposure, foreign languages school curriculum. In Y. Suzuki, & T. Nakata (Eds.). Practice and Automatization in Second Language Research: Theory, Methods, and Pedagogical Implications (Chapter 4).
Mathieu, C., Marcos Miguel, N., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Introduction: Classroom discourse at the intersection of language education and materiality. Classroom Discourse, 12(1-2), 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1870151
Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137—168. https://thinkingtogether.educ.cam.ac.uk/publications/journals/Mercer_JCL2005.pdf
Mercer, N. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1—14.
MEXT (2018, March 17). Improvement of Academic Abilities (Revised Courses of Study). https://www.mext.go.jp/component/english/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2018/03/17/1303755_013.pdf
Michaud, G. & Ammar, A. (2022). Explicit instruction within a task: Before, during, or after? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, First View, 1—19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000316
Reinders, H. & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of enhanced input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, H.
Reinders, R. Erlam, & J. Philp. Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing, and Teaching (281—298). Multilingual Matters. http://dx.doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-014
Revesz, A. (2021). Methodological approaches to investigating task-based language teaching. In Ahmadian, M. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Task-based Language Teaching (605—627). Cambridge University Press. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10146052/
Sato, M. & Storck, N. (2022). Context matters: Learner beliefs and interactional behaviors in an EFL vs. ESL context. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 919—942. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820923582
Sato, R. (2010). Reconsidering the effectiveness and suitability of PPP and TBLT in the Japanese EFL classroom. JALT Journal, 32(2), 189—200. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ32.2-4
Spada, N. (2014). Instructed second language acquisition research and its relevance for L2 teacher education. Education Matters, 2(1), 41—53. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/em/article/view/62912
Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Is there a role for the use of L1 in an L2 setting? TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 760—770.
Swain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (97—114). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first Language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251—274.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45, 143—179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
Tonkyn, A. (1996). Preparing for real-world tasks in the classroom. The Language Teacher, 20(9). https://jalt-publications.org/old_tlt/files/96/sept/task.html
Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
