An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Sub-Skills in EFL Textbooks

Authors

  • Yihun Birhanu Aynalem Department of English language, Science and Technology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia
  • Alamirew Gebremariam Tesmand Department of English language, Science and Technology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8695

Keywords:

Comprehension sub-skills, High School EFL textbooks, Reading exercises, Sociocultural theory,

Abstract

The aim of this research was to investigate the reading comprehension sub-skills Ethiopian EFL textbooks teach in high schools. A descriptive case study was the design of the study, for it acknowledges the sociocultural viewpoint of reading instruction which is characterized by the roles culturally produced mediating artifacts (textbooks) have on students learning opportunities. To this end, reading comprehension questions were the data collected from grade eleven and grade twelve EFL textbooks which were selected drawing on the purposeful sampling technique. A checklist of comprehension sub-skills modified from Barrett’s reading comprehension taxonomy was the data collection instrument. The data collected were analyzed using the descriptive content analysis method. Along with the two researchers, the study involved an inter-rater in order to augment the reliability of the results. He was selected among the English staff based on a random sampling technique. The findings of the research indicated that the comprehension questions of the instructional materials are characterized by the initiations of a preponderance of text-based comprehension sub-skills in general and recognition of comparison and details sub-skills in particular. Additionally, the textbooks do not ask all sub-skills of the comprehension levels except those residing in the literal comprehension. The study also found out that the questions do not teach the comprehension levels in line with their difficulty sequence. Based on the findings, it is stipulated that material designers of grades eleven and twelve EFL textbooks should keep the order of reading comprehension categories and balance the distribution of sub-skills within the comprehension levels while preparing comprehension questions for grades eleven and twelve EFL textbooks.

Author Biographies

Yihun Birhanu Aynalem, Department of English language, Science and Technology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Department of English language, Science and Technology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Alamirew Gebremariam Tesmand, Department of English language, Science and Technology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Department of English language, Science and Technology, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

References

Abebe, D. (2012). Teaching reading skills in English as a foreign language through interactive classroom teaching versus plasma teaching with reference to grade ten students in Addis Ababa. Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Abiy, Y. (2005). Effects of Teacher Mediation on Students' Conceptions and Approaches to Reading. Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Abu, H. (2012). An Evaluative Analysis of Comprehension Questions’ Level of Difficulty: A Case of 12th Grade Palestinian English Student’s Textbook. An-Najah Univ. J. Res, Humanities, 26, 767-788.

Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development, The Modern Language Journal pp. 78465-483.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P.R., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, abridged ed., White Plains, Longman, Barrett. The Barrett Taxonomy of Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Reading Comprehension. Retrieved from http://joebyrne.net/Curriculum/barrett.pdf (accessed on 17 October 2022).

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, & D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain, Longmans, New York, NY.

Brown, J. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Boston: Heinleand Heinle Publishers.

Chanyalew, E. & Abiy, Y. (2015). Teacher’s Current Practices of Teaching Reading and Grade Four Students’ Reading Achievement in Dona Berber Primary School, Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4, 265-272.

Day R. & Park, J. S. (2005). Developing Reading Comprehension Questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 60-73.

Fitria, E. & Syarif, H. (2014). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in Textbooks English Texts in Use and Look ahead for Senior High School Grade X. English Language Teaching, 2.

Freahat, N. & Smadi, O. (2014). Lower-Order and Higher-Order Reading Questions in Secondary and University Level EFL Textbooks in Jordanâ€, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4.

Freeman, D. (2014). Reading Comprehension Questions: The Distribution of Different Types in Global EFL Textbooks. In English Language Teaching Textbooks: Palgrave Macmillan, London, 72-110.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Courses: A Guide for Teachers. Boston, MA, Heinle and Heinle.

Heigham, J. & Crocker, R. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Igbaria, A. K. (2013). A Content Analysis of the Wh-Questions in the EFL Textbook of Horizons. International Education Studies, 6, 200-224.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Klanawong, S. (2017). A Study of Reading Questions in High School English Textbooks and National Tests. The New English Teacher, Bangkok, 11(1), 44-68.

Koo, T. & Mae, L. (2015). A Guideline for Selecting and Reporting Intra-class Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research, Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 1-9.

Korkut, P. & ErtaÅŸ, A. (2016). The Interactional Features of English Classroom Discourse in the MuÄŸla Context. The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 40.

Marzano, R. (2000). Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand Oaks; Corwin Press.

Marzano, R., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C.S., Jones, B.F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S.C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum andInstruction, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Ministry of Education (2009). Finalized Course Catalog for Language Cluster Diploma Program. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa.

Nystrand, M. & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement, Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290. Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Trans.

Coltman D. Orion. Rezat, S. (2016). A Model of Textbook Use. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 409-416.

Riazi, M. & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of Learning Objectives in Iranian High-School and Pre-University English Textbooks Using Bloom's Taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 13, 1-16.

Richards, J. (2022.). Difference between Task, Exercise, Activity Retrieved from ttps://www.professorjackrichards.com/difference-task-exercise-activity (accessed on 24 November, 2022).

Sidek, H. M. (2010) An Analysis of the EFL Secondary Reading Curriculum in Malaysia: Approaches to Reading and Preparation for Higher Education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Simachew, G. & Dawit, D. (2019). The Practice of Teaching Reading Comprehension In Secondary Schools: A Case of Debre Markos Administrative Town, Journal of Education and Practice, 10, 23-40.

Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2002). Should I stay or should I go? Investigating Cambodian women's participation and investment in adult ESL programs, Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 9-26.

Smith, N.B. (1969). The Many Faces of Reading Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 1–20.

Sunggingwati, D. (2003). Reading Questions of Junior High School English Textbooks. Bahasa Dan Seni,

Surtantini, R. (2019). Reading Comprehension Question Levels in Grade X English Students’ Book in Light of the Issues of Curriculum Policy in Indonesia. Journal of Linguistics and Education, 9, 44-52.

Turner, T. (1988). Comprehension: Reading for Meaning. Higher Level of Comprehension: Inference, Critical, and Creative Reading. Questioning Techniques: Probing for Greater Meaning. In J.E, Alexander, Teaching Reading, 3rd ed. Boston, Scott, Foresman, and Company, 159-238.

Wallen, C. (1972). Comprehension Skills. Competency in Teaching Reading. Chicago: Science Research Associates, Inc.

Wertsch, J. (1991).Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-16

How to Cite

Aynalem, Y. B., & Tesmand, A. G. (2023). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Sub-Skills in EFL Textbooks. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(4), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8695

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.