Click It: The Effect of Integrating Socrative and KWL on Students’ Academic Reading Comprehension

Authors

  • Dewi Nur Suci Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia
  • Merliyani Putri Anggraini School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Thailand, Thailand
  • Ary Ningrum IAIN Kediri, Indonesia
  • Inas Nadifah English Teacher, Faculty of Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Qoidatul Marhumah IAIN Kediri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8910

Keywords:

academic text, KWL, Moodle, Socrative, reading comprehension

Abstract

Socrative as one of educational technologies provides the students an ease to learn language through reading activities. They can practice reading on screen as the students in global era have commonly familiarized with. However, the teacher can apply certain reading strategies for students’ understandings on materials when trying to integrate technology for reading. Thus, this research proposes to investigate the effectiveness of Socrative and Moodle in reading classrooms that employ Kow-Want to Know-Learned (KWL) strategy. By using causal comparative study, seventy students of English Department at one of Islamic state universities in East Java Indonesia who are in the third semester are divided into intervention and control groups. The previous group is directed to read by using Moodle and do quiz with Socrative, while the latter read and do the quiz in Moodle. Here, KWL strategy is integrated with both technologies. The results of study exemplify that there is no significance difference between the students in the intervention and the control group. However, the mean scores of posttest on the intervention group increased better than the control group.

Author Biographies

Dewi Nur Suci, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri

English Teacher, Faculty of Education,Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia

Merliyani Putri Anggraini, School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Thailand

School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Thailand

Ary Ningrum, IAIN Kediri

English Teacher, Faculty of Education,Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia

Inas Nadifah, English Teacher, Faculty of Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia

English Teacher, Faculty of Education,Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia

Qoidatul Marhumah, IAIN Kediri

English Teacher, Faculty of Education,Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri, Indonesia

References

Abdulla, M. H. (2018). The use of an online student response system to support learning of Physiology during lectures to medical students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2931–2946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9752-0

Archila, P. A., Anne, J. M., & Mejía, M. T. de. (2018). Using bilingual written argumentation to promote undergraduates’ bilingual scientific literacy: Socrative® as an immersive participation tool. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 40(13), 1–24.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education. Belmont: Thompson Wadsworth.

Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2014). Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 3(4), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2014.3402

Balta, N., Perera-Rodríguez, V.-H., &Hervás-Gómez, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9638-6

Balta, N., & Tzafilkou, K. (2019). Using Socrative software for instant formative feedback in physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9773-8

Chou, M. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.42

Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Eductaional research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Persey Education.

Cross, T., & Palese, K. (2015). Increasing learning: Classroom assessment techniques in the online classroom. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.1023594

Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S., & Mijatovic, I. (2015). Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of Moodle: Students’ perception. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.789062

Dieu, T. T. T. (2015). Trying K-W-L strategy on teaching reading comprehension to passive students in Vietnam. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3(6), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20150306.33

Fengjuan, Z. (2010). The integration of the Know-Want-Learn (KWL) strategy into English language teaching for non-English majors. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 77–86.

Govender, D. W. (2010). Attitudes of students towards the use of a Learning Management System (LMS) in a face-to-face learning mode of instruction. Africa Education Review, 7(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2010.515394

Greenwood, R. (2019). Pupil involvement in planning topics using KWL grids: Opinions of teachers, student teachers and pupils. Educational Studies, 45(4), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509773

Hamdan, M. H. (2014). KWL-plus effectiveness on improving reading comprehension of tenth graders of Jordanian male students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2278–2288.

Hamid, S. M., Rahman, Q., & Atmowardoyo, H. (2016). The use of Prezi with Know, Want, and Learn (KWL) strategy to enhance students reading comprehension. ELT Worldwide, 3(1), 16–31.

Ingalls, V. (2018). Students vote: A comparative study of student perceptions of three popular web-based student response systems. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9365-0

Jimenez-Silva, M., & Luevanos, R. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogy in action: Views from inside a secondary social studies teacher’s classroom. In C. Coulter & M. Jimenez-Silva (Eds.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 29, pp. 81–105). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720150000029008

Joseph, L. M., Alber-Morgan, S., Cullen, J., & Rouse, C. (2016). The effects of self-questioning on reading comprehension: A literature review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.891449

Lange, A. A. (2019). Technology, instructional methods, and the systemic messiness of innovation: Improving reading fluency for low socio-economic elementary school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1333–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09675-2

Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.668576

Ndlovu, M. C., & Mostert, I. (2018). Teacher perceptions of Moodle and throughput in a blended learning programme for in-service secondary school mathematics teachers. Africa Education Review, 15(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1241667

Ogle, D. M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.

Oliver, R., & Vanderford, S. (2012). Evidence of English language proï¬ciency and academic achievement of non-English-speaking background students.pdf. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 541–555.

O’Sullivan, B. (2018). IELTS (International English Language Testing System). In J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0359

Sampson, M. B., Linek, W. M., Raine, I. L., & Szabo, S. (2013). The influence of prior knowledge, university coursework, and field experience on primary preservice teachers’ use of reading comprehension strategies in a year-long, field-based teacher education program. Literacy Research and Instruction, 52(4), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2013.808296

Shaban, A. E. (2017). The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms: Towards active learning. Teaching English with Technology, 17(4), 64–77.

Sinambela, E., Manik, S., & Pangaribuan, R. E. (2015). Improving students’ reading comprehension achievement by using k-w-l strategy. English Linguistics Research, 4(3), 14–29.

St Clair-Thompson, H., Graham, A., & Marsham, S. (2018). Exploring the reading practices of undergraduate students. Education Inquiry, 9(3), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2017.1380487

Steele, J., & Dyer, T. (2014). Use of KWLS in the online classroom as it correlates to increased participation. Journal of Instructional Research, 3(1), 8–14.

Stoffelsma, L., & Spooren, W. (2017). Improving the academic reading proficiency of university students in Ghana: An educational design research approach. Language Matters, 48(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2017.1296017

Szabo, S. (2006). KWHHL: A student-driven evolution of the KWL. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 57–67.

Tsai, Y.-R., & Talley, P. C. (2014). The effect of a course management system (CMS)-supported strategy instruction on EFL reading comprehension and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.757754

Usman, B., Fata, I. A., & Pratiwi, R. (2018). Teaching reading through Know-Want-Learned (KWL) strategy: The effects and benefits. Englisia Journal, 6(1), 35–42.

Xu, S. (2012). Strategies for differentiated instruction for English learners. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek (Eds.), Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 349–378). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-0458(2012)0000001015

Yang, Y., & Badger, R. (2015). How IELTS preparation courses support students: IELTS and academic socialisation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(4), 438–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.953463

Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Zou, Q., & Huang, S. (2018). What learning analytics tells us: Group behavior analysis and individual learning diagnosis based on long-term and large-scale data.Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 245-258. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26388404

Downloads

Published

2023-10-16

How to Cite

Suci, D. N., Anggraini, M. P., Ningrum, A., Nadifah, I., & Marhumah, Q. (2023). Click It: The Effect of Integrating Socrative and KWL on Students’ Academic Reading Comprehension. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(4), 846–856. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8910

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.